User talk:ChrisPsi

File source problem with File:EdisonSlip1903backside.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:EdisonSlip1903backside.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:45, 31 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:45, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pecker Dunne with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:15, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I was just trying to revert to a non vandalized version of the text. Obviously someone else reverted it before me, and I made that undone. No malice intended. ChrisPsi (talk) 18:20, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I thought that might be it. Things got a little hairy there for a few minutes. Thanks for trying to help :) A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:26, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

User talk:93.56.243.230
Hi, obviously I don't know the circumstances of your comment on User talk:93.56.243.230, however I thought I would bring this up, I apologise if I've misread the situation. It concerns your comment: "not acceptable to erase text from ANY talk page without strong reasons." WP:TPO states "Simply deleting others' comments on your talk page is permitted, but most editors prefer archiving." As this is the opposite to what you wrote on the talk page, and I am correct about circumstances, I think it would be best for you to let the IP user know, and withdraw your comment. Callanecc (talk) 20:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC) This also means that when you were undoing 93.56.243.230's removals, you were acting in contravention of WP:TPG. So I very much encourage you to leave a message for 93.56.243.230 and apologise for your actions. Particularly since 93.56.243.230's removal occurred a month before you went back to the page and undid the removal even though the user hadn't edited in that time. Callanecc (talk) 20:34, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Not a day without that you learn something new! I just assumed that the rules for talk pages were global, and commented as I would have, had it been a Swedish language talk page (as I am a Swedish user). And on those, it is not acceptable to erase comments, own or others. (See and autotranslate http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Diskussionssidor#Radera_inte if you wish). But obviuously I will comply with the different rules here. I will apologise to the user, and restore my editing. Regards, ChrisPsi (talk) 20:40, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for apologising, and I've added a welcome to the page. Yeah I've noticed with a few people that the English Wikipedia's rules are quite different to the other projects. The other thing I wanted to bring up (and since you were acting to what you thought was a policy breach, it's not as bad), but going back in a month after the incident (especially since the user hadn't made any edits in that month) could be construed as punitive or vindictive (to use the harsh words); so make sure you're careful with that (even if it was in contravention of policy it's better just to leave it). Callanecc (talk) 23:07, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Die Fledermaus discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hungarian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Now corrected. Thanks for the input, bot! :-) ChrisPsi (talk) 10:09, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Battle of Orford Ness (1704)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Battle of Orford Ness (1704), ChrisPsi!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please add sources."

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:35, 21 July 2017 (UTC)