User talk:ChrisRuvolo/Archive/2011

NJ Legislative maps
Hey Chris, I see you're on a break, but I was wondering if you could do new maps for the NJ Legislative districts like the ones you did for 2001? The new maps from the state for numbering have been released here. I have no graphic talents, so if you can't I will look for someone else. Thanks.  Jim Miller  See me 16:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Hey Jim, I used the shape files here to generate the previous map.  There was no graphic talent involved. :)  If/when those files are updated, I can try to generate a new SVG.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 21:08, 5 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Looks like a map has already been made, see here: File:New Jersey Legislative Districts Map (2011).svg. No idea how accurate this is though.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 21:24, 5 April 2011 (UTC)


 * And apparently I don't know what year it is! Thanks for the cleanup.  Jim Miller  See me 22:07, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Wall Street has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for May 2011
Wall Street, a page you edited has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for May 2011. We encourage you to participate in improving this article. You can also vote for next months article of the Month here. --Kumioko (talk) 01:12, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

You're invited to the New York Wiknic!


This message is being sent to inform you of a Wikipedia picnic that is being held in your area next Saturday, June 25. From 1 to 8 PM or any time in between, join your fellow volunteers for a get together at Norman's Landscape ( directions ) in Manhattan's Central Park.

Take along your friends (newbies permitted), your family and other free culture enthusiasts! You may also want to pack a blanket, some water or perhaps even a frisbee.

If you can, share what you're bringing at the discussion page.

Also, please remember that this is the picnic that anyone can edit so bring enough food to share!

To subscribe to future events, follow the mailing list or add your username to the invitation list. BrownBot (talk) 19:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Coyne After War.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Coyne After War.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Bergen County
Don't know if you're aware that you've inserted a duplication of the State Parks subsection twice now. I'll take care of it (again). 96.242.217.91 (talk) 02:35, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks, my error. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 15:29, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


 * "State parks: replace image; flows better and is more illustrative" -- Seriously, bro? LOL!!! Why don't you just say that you like that picture better?

(Personally, I don't know why, it seems darker and gloomier than the other one, which actually shows more crisp detail, is brighter, and looking southward, hints at a silhouette of the Manhattan skyline - but to each his own, I guess.) 96.242.217.91 (talk) 00:23, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I find it more illustrative of the palisades itself, the item of discussion. It better displays the cliffs in thumbnail form, IMO.  Yes, this is opinion.  If there is a disagreement, we can talk to build consensus on the talk page.  As for flowing better, I was referring to the landscape aspect ratio and size of the image in relation to the other surrounding images.  Again, this is my opinion.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 17:01, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I'd also like to bring up another point - I notice that another editor had recently posted an image of Koreatown in Palisades Park, and you nixed it calling it an empty street. I had posted the same thing perhaps a year ago, and you did the same thing, stating the same reason. First of all, that is simply not true about being an empty street - click the picture just once, and you can immediately count about seven or eight Korean businesses. Second of all, the caption I believe was referenced. Third, it may not be as dense as the Manhattan Chinatown, or maybe the picture was taken at mid-morning beween rush hour and lunch hour on a weekday when fewer people are out, or maybe the picture was just captured at the unfortunate second when people and cars were out of view - but none of these things matter, nor do they belie the legitimacy of the Koreatown's existence. I also believe that the image should go up, and to be honest, I find your viewpoint offensive on this particular point.

96.242.217.91 (talk) 00:46, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The primary subject of the photo appears to be the street and sky. It is not for lack of cars that I object, it is the lack of the ability to tell that it is Korean businesses when in thumbnail form (even at 300 or 350px).  Even when looking at the image page, it is hard to tell since all of the signs are at oblique angles.  I would welcome a better image clearly showing that the signs are using hangul.  Compare for example File:Day124ckoreatown.JPG and File:Koreatown manhattan 2009.JPG.  Please assume good faith and do not ascribe objectionable reasons for the image's removal without talking to me first.  The removal of the image does not indicate that the existence of Koreatown is somehow illegitimate, merely that it is not illustrative.  As for the references, two of the three are in the article already.  If the "serious eats" reference is important, it should be added to the main text.  BTW, lets take this to the article talk page for any further discussion.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 17:01, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Agree the Koreatown image is valid and self-explanatory and belongs in the article.-173.220.112.82 (talk) 15:20, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I would like a Koreatown image in the article, but this one doesn't make the cut in my opinion. Lets take this to the article talk page for any further discussion.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 17:01, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


 * moved discussion to Talk:Bergen County, New Jersey -- please reply there. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 17:08, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

VTA Map
I noticed you did some modification to the map of the VTA light rail used in several articles. Are you able to edit the names on the map? the Snell and Cottle stations are labeled backwards to their relative positions. BT14 (talk) 00:18, 12 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, I swapped the two station labels on File:VTALightRail.svg and File:VTA-light-rail.svg. Does that look better?  Thanks.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 14:40, 16 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Much appreciated! :) BT14 (talk) 16:25, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:The Musical in NYC Oct 22
You are invited to Wikipedia:The Musical in NYC, an editathon, Wikipedia meet-up and lectures that will be held on Saturday, October 22, 2011, at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts (at Lincoln Center), as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events being held across the USA.

All are welcome, sign up on the wiki and here !--Pharos (talk) 04:02, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Gloucester County College - thanks! And one question...
Hi. Thanks for going over the Gloucester County College page and rating it. What sort of infobox is suitable (the WikiProjec New Jersey tag says one is needed), besides the college/university one that's already up there? Thanks again! Allens (talk) 17:01, 4 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Sure, happy to take a look. It is a good start, but some sections are entirely unreferenced. If references were added for each section, that would go a long way toward making it into C-class.  As for the infobox, I didn't pay attention to that tag.  Removed, as it obviously does have an infobox.  Cheers.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 17:22, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Princetons discussion
Just wanted to mention as a WPNJ participant, you might want to discuss the situation with the now-near confirmed Princeton merge. (Discussion is being held at Talk:Borough of Princeton, New Jersey at the WPNJ talk page). Mitch32(Never support those who think in the box) 03:13, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Ramapough Lenape Nation
hi Chris! Hope you are enjoying your hiatus. I would like to ask you a professional question. Can we chat off line? Thanks!

Ramapoughnative (talk) 02:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Steven, sure, how should I contact you offline? --ChrisRuvolo (t) 14:56, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Census 2010 template and test
Take a look at Template:USCensusDemographics and User:Alansohn/Absecon, New Jersey. There's some debugging stuff in there now to help me pick up the fields by number, but I think I'm pretty darn close. Check out the details against your spreadsheet to make sure that I'm substituting the right fields. Thanks again for making this happen! Alansohn (talk) 23:06, 14 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Looks good, nice work! I verified the fields used matched up with the spreadsheet.  I made one tweak in the units labeling for housing unit density.  The reference doesn't seem to be populated, how do you want to handle that?  I would think including the reference in the template would be easiest.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 03:30, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I will play with it. Check out Hasbrouck Heights, New Jersey and Haworth, New Jersey where the template has been used as is. The template can use refinement, but the fields seem to match up and are formatted correctly. Thanks for all of your work to get the data downloaded and formatted into a template. Alansohn (talk) 05:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Thanks for your work in building the template.  I was updating River Vale, and noticed that there was also the paragraph in the Geography section which is based on census data.  For River Vale, the area as published changed between 2000 and 2010.  Rather than manually create/update this as well, I created USCensusGeography, with the same parameters.  This may be overkill, but since we have the data, it was easy to do.  Do you think this is worthwhile? --ChrisRuvolo (t) 14:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Really nice update to WikiProject New Jersey/Census 2010/Demographics to make it easier to grab data. I messed up the geography template trying to insert a "subst:" parameter but it just drilled down to the details of the decimal template. I also have a separate link for CensusArea to the link at here with the details on area that aren't in the Census2010 links. I've used the templates at North Arlington, New Jersey and Margate City, New Jersey and so far they look great. Again, kudos on getting this done, and getting it done so quickly. Now if we could just populate all of New Jersey we would only have 49 states left to complete. Thanks again! Alansohn (talk) 20:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

One problem: I thought I could cheat by calculating number of families based on multiplying the percentage of families by the number of households. It's very close in most cases, but the larger the number the greater the discrepancy. I can't figure out why number of families is in the detailed table for each municipality but we can't find it in any of the state detail lists. For now, it's close but it needs to be added and corrected. Alansohn (talk) 21:03, 15 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I can't find that. Where is the detailed table?  For the CensusArea, feel free to update the geography template.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 19:09, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Take a look at the DP1 source table for Hasbrouck Heights, New Jersey. The census table has 3,186 families, while the template we've created calculates 3,187 families using the percentage of families as the basis. Thanks for all of your effort and thanks for posting the details on our beta test to WP:NJ. Alansohn (talk) 22:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Your reformatting of the 2010 Census location changes at WikiProject New Jersey/Census 2010 makes the data all the more readable and the new table answers maty of the mysteries raised in your original listing. I still am baffled as to the whole issue of how townships are handled, but we can finesse that for now. As for area, I pulled all the New Jersey places from this file, which has all 2010 places listed (with Townships, but without CDPs, again with no idea why) with revised location data and area for land and water down to the square meter and thousandths of a square mile (three decimal places). I built a spreadsheet that trims all the numbers to three decimal places with a column that I'm playing with to build the geography data. We still have some missing and inconsistent pieces, but most of the puzzle is forming. Thanks again for all of your help. Alansohn (talk) 19:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Hey Alan, thanks for the kind words and the barnstar. Much appreciated.  I hope you are enjoying the holidays.  Regarding townships in census data, I think due to many states calling unincorporated territory "townships", the census treats them different than populated places.  To somewhat rectify this, there were co-terminus CDPs for each NJ township in 2000, but they removed the CDPs in 2010.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 17:21, 28 December 2011 (UTC)