User talk:ChrisVividkiwi

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 16:01, 19 June 2018 (UTC)


 * If you don't represent the Student Union, you might as well, as your draft reads as if someone from the Union wrote it. Are you a member of the Union, even if you aren't here as its representative?  Things like "Mission" and "Vision" are wholly unencyclopedic as they are impossible to independently verify.  Wikipedia is only interested in what independent reliable sources state about an organization, indicating how it meets WP:ORG, the notability guidelines for organizations. 331dot (talk) 10:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

rename and unblock discussion
Sorry, too similar to existing username. Please try again placing a new choice in the spot for the desired new name.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 10:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

I am not the member of the Union, however, I used to be a student of the University graduated in 2015. All the information used is gathered through the oficial websites of the Students' Union and University. Could you please let me know exactly which parts are not appropriate for the wikipedia, so I can change them. I would take off the Startegic Framework section. The Vision statement is taken from the official documents of the Union, which is mainly like a motto of the organisation, not the promotional slogan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Union.socialmedia (talk • contribs)
 * I've fixed your unblock request to reflect your new choice of username, subsequent comments may be made without unblock request formatting, as only one request is needed.
 * Any article about this organization must have little if any reference at all to its own website or materials. As I stated, Wikipedia is only interested in what independent reliable sources state about an organization.  If none have written about it, then it will not be possible for there to be an article about it here at this time.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not merely a forum to disseminate information(as social media is).  Can you understand why someone might think you represent the Union, given that you chose "Union.socialmedia" as your username(which suggests you are the Union social media rep/coordinator)? 331dot (talk) 10:19, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes, sorry about this. It is my first experience of creating the wikipedia page and obviously, there is still a lot of things I should learn. I will try to rewrite it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Union.socialmedia (talk • contribs)
 * I'm going to leave this for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 10:25, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * comment Using the subject's "official" verbage is the best way to create promotionality. AS is mentioned above. Someone must have written a great deal about the subject in  an unbiased manner to meet notability requirements for an encyclopedia.  I would not unblock you myself if this is the only subject you wish to write about. In the words of, "My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start."  My first efforts at article creation were deleted too. I gained experience improving other articles and then created a few adequately sourced articles f my own.-- Dloh cier ekim   (talk) 10:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)


 * More information about avoiding promotional writing -- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 10:47, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

renamed Union.socialmedia to ChrisVividkiwi
renamed Union.socialmedia to ChrisVividkiwi -- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 10:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)