User talk:Chris Henniker

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --dcabrilo 18:06, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Edit summary
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing. Skinnyweed 14:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Nazi punk
Chris, please stop vandalizing the Nazi punk article. Most so-called Nazi punks believe in 'National Socialism' which is an anti-Capitalist/pro-State socialism ideology. If you don't understand the Socialist roots and practice of Nazism, I recommend reading the Road to Serfdom, particularly the chapter entitled "The Socialist Roots of Nazism." Liberal Fascism is another great read to see how Nazism and Fascism are essentially anti-Capitalist left-wing movements. Racism is also a form of collectivism, which in turn makes it more left-wing than right-wing (the right being characterized by individualism). They are a movement of the left and support left-liberal economic policies. Even on their own website www.NaziPunk.8k.com they list under their ideology they believe in non-Marxist Socialism, National Syndicalism and National Anarchism.

Conservative Punk conforms far better to what you're saying about Nazi punk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.103.110.185 (talk) 11:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Antiseen
This article is up for deletion. I thought maybe you could help provide more links to media coverage, tour info, etc.? PT ( s-s-s-s ) 21:04, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Streetpunk, not Street Punk
I noticed you added the category Street Punk to some band articles. The category should be called Streetpunk, since that's what the genre is called in the article, and that's the way most people write the name of the genre. I'm not sure how to change the name of the category though, so maybe you can help.Spylab 02:15, 15 September 2006 (UTC)Spylab

Pressure (band)
Hello. I decided to delete the article Pressure (band) because it failed WP:MUSIC. The JPS talk to me  17:33, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

The Schla La Las
Why do you say that this is important? I see your hangon template, but no response in 20 minutes as to why? —— Eagle (ask me for help) 16:09, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for telling me about the other unimportant band. Any good reason to put them on here? you can post to usenet if you want to preserve them for postarity. `—— Eagle (ask me for help) 17:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Hot Rod
I reverted your addition of a link to the above article. You may want to see WP:EL Cheers, JChap2007 21:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Hollaback Girl
Hi there, I wanted to let you know that I did a partial revert of your edits to the Hollaback Girl article. According to the current reference, it was a 1962 Chevy Impala and not a 1961. If you believe it indeed was a 1961 Impala, please be sure to provide a reliable source that shows that. —ShadowHalo 22:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing that out. I found what seems to be a more reliable source (IMCDb) which says it's a 1961 Chevy Impala.  In the future, it's helpful to provide a citation when you add/change information in an article.  If you have any more questions or comments, feel free to leave them at my talk page.  —ShadowHalo 00:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

The Psalters
A tag has been placed on The Psalters, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 03:14, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Electrogoth
An article that you have been involved in editing, Electrogoth, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Electrogoth. Thank you.TheDarknessVisible 19:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Goth subculture
Re this edit.. when you find yourself typing phrases like "Some critics see.." and "this could equally apply.." and "most goths argue..", that's a sure sign that you need to be providing a reliable source for exactly who says and argues these things. See Avoid weasel words. --Stormie 21:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Mallaria
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mallaria, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. B. Wolterding 10:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Anastrophe 15:42, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Hardline (subculture)
Another editor has added the  template to the article Hardline (subculture), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 02:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Hardline (subculture)
An editor has nominated Hardline (subculture), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Fog Band
A tag has been placed on The Fog Band requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ninety:one 21:20, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi, I declined the speedy deletion. I'd like to help you improve the article. Let's discuss it at Talk:The Fog Band.  Thanks, Darkspots (talk) 13:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Additions to hippie
You or someone using another account has made these additions to Hippie before. They were removed because the sources provided didn't support the claims. Please provide sources or they will be removed again. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 16:52, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

new paragraph in Rhythm and Blues
Hey, Chris, it would really be good if you came up with some "verifiable" material that could be checked quickly to substantiate what you've added. Who says all this stuff is r&b derivative? Please help me (and us) maintain the quality of this article. Steve Pastor (talk) 19:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Category:Pedophiles
You should be aware that all pedophilia-related articles are subject to special scrutiny here, for obvious reasons; therefore, it is paramount that adding individuals to this category requires particular care, in particular with respect to reliable sourcing and verifiability. Accordingly, policy applies, particularly with respect to people who can sue us. Although the tabloid media describe Gary Glitter as a pedophile, to be included in that category would require a better, almost clinical definition, and I invite you to examine DSM-IV-TR and cite such a diagnosis for Glitter. Failing that, the question is obviously raised as to the proper scope of that category, and if necessary, if it cannot be strictly defined (per WP:BLP and WP:V), it should be deleted as vague and subjective. Cheers. -- Rodhull andemu  00:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Lenerd (talk) 01:36, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Four-minute Warning
I have removed your surprising assertion that Jodrell Bank telescope was used for detecting incoming ballistic missiles. It seems very unlikely that a radio telescope could be used for this purpose (or even be capable of it) and I cannot find any reference on the web for this. If you can indicate a reliable source for the information, put it back in. Please indicate where you discovered this information. 21stCenturyGreenstuff (talk) 16:12, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Ridernyc (talk) 00:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Punk film
I have nominated punk film for renaming to punk films. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. DKqwerty (talk) 00:14, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Nja 247 14:58, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Final Warning
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia by vandalising (inserting false information into articles), you will be blocked from editing. Nja 247 15:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Peace and Passion &#9774; ''("I'm listening....") 05:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scum punk
A tag has been placed on Scum punk, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hoponpop69 (talk) 21:16, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Proto punk
Does the seemingly scatter gun approach, of applying proto-punk genres to disparate musicians, actually serve a positive purpose here ? Or is it, rather like your general editing history, merely trying to disrupt, annoy and confuse ? Try verifiability for further education.

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 02:00, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Soft rock, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ridernyc (talk) 21:18, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Sourcing
When it comes to likely to be contested information, remember to source the additions you make to the Serial killer article or any other Wikipedia article; read WP:Reliable sources and look at WP:Citing sources. If you do not source these additions, they will most likely be contested (such as placed with a citation-needed tag or removed). Flyer22 (talk) 14:58, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Radio Ivre and others
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Radio Ivre, Radio Dio. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Articles for deletion/Radio Ivre for Radio Ivre, Articles for deletion/Radio Dio for Radio Dio. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:21, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Q102 (Pirate Station)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Q102 (Pirate Station). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Q102 (Pirate Station). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

While Wikistalking...
There was a third Borrible book? Cor! AndroidCat (talk) 04:43, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Alan Vega birthdate
As you may know Alan Vega's birthdate is currently listed as 1948. There appears to conflicting evidence - the official book - versus the currently sourced Blast First Press Release. I'm trying to build consensus for a change. Please add comments on Talk :Alan Vega. Thanks. Wwwhatsup (talk) 06:38, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Serial killer article : Sourcing
Hello, Chris Henniker. We ask that you provide sources (WP:Reliable sources) for this edit, and any other edits you make similar to this. If not, the additions will be removed. Flyer22 (talk) 18:45, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for providing a source. Flyer22 (talk) 18:48, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I really appreciated reading the examples you added to this list in Serial killer, showing that there can be exceptions rule also.  Lova Falk     talk   07:43, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Operation Minstead
Please don't add legal advice to this page. The article is sourced from media articles so already public knowledge. People who shouldn't read it (such as jury members) will be warned not to by the judge as the would be warned not to read newspaper articles on the story. We don't see warns like this (directed at a handful of people) in newspaper articles so they are certainly not required in Wikipedia. - SimonLyall (talk) 00:53, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Serial killer
I reverted a change you made to Serial killer, stating "Unsourced" as the reason. I gave it a second thought and maybe the reason I gave should be clarified. What I meant was not a source for the facts themselves, although that is missing too. You wrote: "It could be argued that, in some sense, he was a parody of a mission-oriented serial killer", and this is what I was missing a source for. I am not aware of any reliable source arguing this, and unless one is given, this seems like OR. I hope this is clearer. --Muhandes (talk) 00:52, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Hipster (contemporary subculture), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive' 03:47, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hydrochloric acid. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 00:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Some things you should know by now

 * Always cite a source for any new information, using, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
 * "Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
 * We do not publish original thought. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:25, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
This is your last warning; the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Singapore Girl, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 10:39, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Singapore Girl. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 10:54, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Hi, Sorry to trouble you but would you be able to verify your addition to Singapore embassies attack plot please? Thanks &#0149;martyx&#0149; tk ct gy 13:13, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anna Reksik


The article Anna Reksik has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable fictional character so minor not even linked to from Viz (comic). No references in > 3 years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:47, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Music from Southend-on-Sea
Category:Music from Southend-on-Sea, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 22:12, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

MediaCorp TV12
Hi, Chris Henniker. I don't know if this article is on your watchlist, but I wanted you to know I've made some changes there. I've commented on the article talk page and am inviting those that have edited the article over the passed year to comment. Regards  Tide  rolls  14:08, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Category:University fire brigades
Category:University fire brigades, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 02:39, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Please, please, please don't forget to provide an edit summary. It costs us much more time than you save. Pretty please. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Sportspeople convicted of crimes
Category:Sportspeople convicted of crimes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 02:14, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Jason Lawrence, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cresix (talk) 02:35, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

ADDITIONAL NOTE
I just removed your unsourced BLP violation (Category:Sportspeople convicted of crimes) from Juan Garriga. It seems that you have added numerous such BLP violations to articles. Therefore, I now must INSIST that you go back through all of your edits and remove the category that is not clearly supported by a reliably sourced statement in the article. I can't believe I have to explain this to you, but being charged with a crime is NOT the same as being convicted of a crime. If you do not immediately make the corrections, my next step will be to remove the category from ALL articles, and then the category will be deleted. Cresix (talk) 03:08, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Secular temperance movement
Please see Talk:Christian_views_on_alcohol about your recent edits to that article. --Fl e x (talk/contribs) 19:25, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Talk:List_of_Viz_comic_strips
As the creator of some of these, you might wish to express an opinion. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reprezent, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dependency and Grime (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Noose (TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mike Neville and Andrew Gardner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Vauxhall Viscount
Here you stated that the Vauxhall Viscount received a Chrysler V8 in South Africa. Do you happen to have any source for this intriguing fact? Thanks,  Mr.choppers &#124;   ✎  14:59, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

See Also sections
Please do not attempt to smuggle unsourced material in as notes in the See Also sections of articles. Britmax (talk) 18:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Weapons-grade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nonce. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

'Drawknobs'?
It's a long time ago, nut this seems to be your edit: Is there any chance you could clarify what 'drawknobs' are in this context - I can't find anything via Google that seems to make sense. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:19, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Reprezent for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reprezent is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Reprezent until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Wartime Broadcasting Service
Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.civildefence.co.uk/attack-warning.php. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed and I paraphrased some. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:14, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hippie, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Loop and Ride ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Hippie check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Hippie?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Grey Baskerville has left the building
After surviving AfDs, Doug Thorley and Magoo are still up, but both could use better sourcing. I'm wondering if you've got back issues of Hot Rod, Car Craft, National Dragster, & the like that would help. Ditto on Jake, Showboat, The Mantaray, Ed Donovan, Donovan hemi, Silhouette, and a few others I've created lately. (Have a look at my userpage under the "Open Vanity" 3&4.) Any help you can be would be very much appreciated. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  06:21, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Stuart Maconie's Freak Zone moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Stuart Maconie's Freak Zone, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Stuart Maconie's Freak Zone concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stuart Maconie's Freak Zone, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Stuart Maconie's Freak Zone


Hello, Chris Henniker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stuart Maconie's Freak Zone".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj</b> (📧) 04:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rock Against Sexism


A tag has been placed on Rock Against Sexism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Hoponpop69 (talk) 02:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Rock Against Sexism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rock Against Sexism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rock Against Sexism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hoponpop69 (talk) 19:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rock Against Sexism


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Rock Against Sexism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aasim (talk) 20:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Raid (band)


The article Raid (band) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Other than the brief AllMusic biography, I cannot find any sources for this band."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SEX: Too Fast to Live Too Young to Die


The article SEX: Too Fast to Live Too Young to Die has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NALBUM"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  22:08, 27 November 2023 (UTC)