User talk:Chris Longley

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Copyright
Hi Chris. My main contributions to the copyright article itself tend to be limited to reverting vandalism, though I have written other copyright-related articles. Your point in re copyright as a verb is well-taken.  I can only intelligently speak as to copyright in the U.S., unfortunately.  Here, copyright protection does attach upon creation of an original work of authorship, regardless of any actions taken to copyright (verb) the work.  One can, however, register a copyright in the U.S., which doesn't grant any additional protection per se, but allows one certain remedies at trial, can help prove one's claim in a "first in time" dispute, etc.  I believe the same or similar regimes exist in all countries that are signatories to the Berne Convention.

Nonetheless, "copyright" as a verb still has a place, I believe. For example, before the U.S. 1976 copyright act, the copyright regime here required that notice of a claim of copyright be affixed to an original work. Thus, there was a process by which an author would "copyright" his or her work. All works in the U.S. created before 1978 (when the '76 Act went into effect) are still governed by the old notice regime.

If there are particular points in the copyright article that you believe are using the verb improperly, please feel free to edit them out, bearing in mind the above qualifications. I haven't read through the article in quite some time, so I have no doubt that it needs some work in this regard. Cheers. · j e r s y k o talk · 14:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. Different users use different methods, and there is no established etiquette on the matter as far as I know. Don't hesitate to ask if you have any other questions, copyright-related or not. · j e r s y k o talk · 19:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ephotozine


A tag has been placed on Ephotozine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 00:30, 23 September 2011 (UTC)