User talk:Chris Renet

Feedback on your article
Hello Chris Renet, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 05:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Intro sentence: good
 * Links: a good start, more will be needed
 * Headers: good
 * References: so far so good
 * Context/timeframe: good start, more is needed
 * How was the book received: missing
 * Hi Chris Renet,
 * Intro sentence: good
 * Links: okay
 * Headers: okay
 * References: In Wikipedia we would like to know where information comes from. The second paragraph (starting with In the essay) and the section under Contents also need references. For the rest I am happy that all other parts have references! :-)
 * Context/timeframe: In the Context section the first paragraph jumps into the second, and misses a bridge. For the rest I think it is a good start, I hope you can find more for this part of the article.
 * How was the book received: A question that comes to my mind with reading this part is if she was successful? Did she achieve the aim she had?
 * I am happy so far with your article! Greetings - Romaine (talk) 11:41, 10 August 2020 (UTC)