User talk:Chris Zentours

Hi, Chris ...

Someone deleted your post on the Schizoid PD page with an obscure synopsis that it was "in the wrong forum". I suspect he meant that the post was more typical for a discussion/support forum... but in the interest in making you feel welcomed, not rejected, I am going to paste what you said here.... It is incredibly demoralizing to find your deepest expressions of self wiped out without kind or understandable explanation. Perhaps you may wish to use it on your own editor page (the other differently colored tab above), which some editors use as a way to introduce and express themselves. Welcome and hope you find your stay worth your while... Spotted Owl (talk) 18:04, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

The Bigger Picture

 * I am a new comer to this wikipedia gig and i have just posted a change to the "schizoid personality disorder" page. The mentioned is generic although it also covers myself as an INTJ on the myers-briggs scale.  Sure, i am "schizoid" pretty much as described in the loner sense, although i did not yet read all the rest.  But i am normal in that any of us can only be what our genetic design allows us the latitude to be.  I cite millions of years of evolution-nature or god as my higher authorities here.  In regard to the isolated loner that is my "affiction" i say the following  --- i am a holistic thinking information strategist with aptitudes in psychology, sociology, anthropology, who delves in great depth into the 3 branches of metaphysics that together are philosophy.

My specialty is ontology, the science of being, which in the east is called zen. I am uneducated except by massive information consumption and processing over my 55 years. Sure i am a loner; i am a philosopher !!!!. "Abnormal" !!!!. Captain Cook, Sir Edmond Hillery, Hannibal, Galilaeo, you name them, they were all "social weirdos" from the point of view of those who assume socialising to be racially normal. Have you ever checked out the intellects, aspirations, hopes, dreams, accomplishments of those who are the most socially acceptable ?. Hail the Schizoids of life, for we are normal and the rest of them are those that have the problems !!!!

The word "apple", spoken, is a sound. The word "apple", written, is lines on paper. The apple itself, seperate from the written and spoken word "apple", is a reality that can only be experienced by the apple experiencing itself. Words can not and do not describe reality. To understand "apple" you first have to experience the subjectivity of BEING the apple. You then have to UN-BECOME the apple and objectively study the information with your subjective ungodlike human brain/conscious/mind. Words can not and never will describe reality and all definitions via words are in effect the thoughts and beliefs of fools....

Whether i am an intj from childhood trauma, "forced introspection", or whether it be from genetic composition from my parents genetics combining into me, is irrelevant. I am one of "the options" in life, that in human variety gives us all the types to have the complexity as a group mind species to have civilization rather than be living in the trees. We are as a species genetically designed to function as a "group mind", ie, as a "Tribe"/"Community" and it is our variety as individuals that allows and causes that group mind brain storming, which thus causes civilization. The problem is not our human individuality. The problem is the perception limitations of those who are catagorising us.... as posted by Chris