User talk:Chris fardon

1982 Commonwealth Games medal winners
Hi. Thank you for adding the information about medals by events for the 1982 Commonwealth Games. Your work is very much appreciated.

However, could you please create new pages for each of the events, as I have done for the Athletics medals (with the information you supplied about the Athletics events). Thanks.

The reason for this request is because the page will become extremely long if all the events are added to the main article page for the Games. Therefore, the creation of new pages for each of the events is essential to avoid this happening.

I will create a new page for the Archery medals for the 1982 Commonwealth Games. Figaro 14:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

categories
Hi Chris, If an article is in category "Museums in York" it doesn't need "Museums in Yorkshire" too, as the former is a subcategory of the latter. I've removed a few you've added. PamD (talk) 14:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page The 3 Worlds of Gulliver (film) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Techman224 Talk  15:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Arlene Dahl
Why did you change Dahl's year of birth? She was born in 1925 per the 1930 United States Census (Hennepin County, Minnesota). Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 20:52, 22 October 2009 (UTC) Sorry, my mistake - it wasn't you. My bad!! Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 21:05, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Chris fardon! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:27, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Bev Kinch -
 * 2) John Mayock -
 * 3) Kirsty Wade -
 * 4) Julian Goater -
 * 5) Cameron Sharp -
 * 6) Christina Cahill -
 * 7) Tony Allcock -
 * 8) Judy Grinham -

Intruder in the Dust
Hi, The plot summary you created is verbatim from the IMDb of course.

Is that legit?

Because that text is by frankfob2@yahoo.com whoever he may be.

Varlaam (talk) 00:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Intruder in the Dust (1949 film)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Intruder in the Dust (1949 film), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Intruder in the Dust (1949 film) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Intruder in the Dust (1949 film), in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Intruder in the Dust (1949 film) with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Intruder in the Dust (1949 film). See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Intruder in the Dust (1949 film) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Varlaam (talk) 22:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Your addition to Intruder in the Dust (1949 film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:26, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. When you recently edited Little, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Andrew Little and Anna Little (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nefertiti, Queen of the Nile


The article Nefertiti, Queen of the Nile has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Appears to fail WP:NFILM, tagged for notability earlier in October 2022"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  20:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)