User talk:Chris ipop

September 2020
Hello Chris ipop. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to JT Group Limited, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Chris ipop. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

I am not doing this for financial gain. Thanks.

November 2020
As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to JT Group Limited, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Chris ipop, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:23, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I am not doing this for financial gain. Thanks.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to JT Group Limited, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I am new to this and not sure why you keep reverting my edits... I am doing this as a favor to a Jersey Business who is not able to make these edits and not being compensated. I had previously posted above to confirm the above. :Please advise
 * Hi Chris. If you are doing a favour to someone you know who works for the business then Wikipedia considers this a 'conflict of interest'. I will provide information about what this means and how it impacts your editing below. Adding neutral statements about the company and giving a reliable, independent source is one thing, but you should not remove factual information already in the article without a valid reason.
 * Hi Chris. If you are doing a favour to someone you know who works for the business then Wikipedia considers this a 'conflict of interest'. I will provide information about what this means and how it impacts your editing below. Adding neutral statements about the company and giving a reliable, independent source is one thing, but you should not remove factual information already in the article without a valid reason.

Hello, Chris ipop. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page JT Group Limited, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:21, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

 Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, as you did at JT Group Limited. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. For that request to be considered, you must: David Gerard (talk) 21:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
 * State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
 * Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.