User talk:Chris j wood/2005

Archives

 * User talk:Chris_j_wood/2004

LUL boxes
No, I'm changing the system. If you look at what I've done to Liverpool Street that is how they should be, there's quite a lot to correct. ed g2s &bull;  talk  01:14, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Cunninghamia & taxoboxes
Hi Chris - a line space at the end of the taxobox is WP:TOL policy, you'll find it on virtually all of the species, genus, family, etc pages; it is done to make the taxobox a discrete unit on the edit page and so minimise the risk of editors editing in the wrong place by accident (e.g. adding a paragraph of text above the line) - MPF 11:43, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Toccoa, Georgia
Well, there is no single definition of stub that everyone accepts, but Find or fix a stub describes it thus: ''A stub is a very short article, generally of one paragraph or less. Most stubs fail to cover all but the most trivial subjects completely.'' I don't think the Rambot-generated city articles qualify as stubs. Yes, there is certainly much more that could be said about ALL of the 30,000 or so similar city articles--but marking them as stubs will simply clog the stub categories and make it more difficult to identify true stubs that barely even provide basic info. Unlike stubs that may have been created by an anon, may be uncategorized, may not even have any links to them, and may thus be difficult to locate again for anyone who might be able to improve them--the Rambot city articles are really not difficult to locate--some people complain that they are hard to avoid. Thus I don't really see any point to flagging Rambot-generated city article with the stub tag.

A stub tag is NOT the same as identifying a specific area for improvement within the article. There are Todo templates, which create lists of unfinished items on the talk page (and which to be honest I don't know how they work, but I'm sure if you ask around someone can point you in the right direction). Or if you are really keen on a particular subject like transportation, you can create a Wikiproject and identify some standard information that you want to include in a set of articles and identify the articles and maybe even recruit some assistance. As for your comment If we leave the article as it is after your change, I would expect a naive reader who doesn't know the area to assume Toccoa is inaccessible by road or air, for example -- that would have to be a very naive reader to make such an assumption. I don't think adding a generic stub tag would do much to help such a naive reader. I think there may even be some templates to mark specific sections as requiring further development. Such a note would be more useful that a generic stub tag.

You wrote: ''I also notice you reinstated the population figure which is duplicated from the demographics section to the lead para. I don't have a strong objection to duplicating info, but I wonder what is gained by this duplication.'' Because it's standard across most city articles to mention the population in the intro. Population is regarded by many as a very significant detail about places, so it should be highlighted in the intro and there is little harm in repeating it in the demographics section. Best. older &ne; wiser 19:53, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)

thanks for ...
... note on "Atlanta". I just voted "support" at the last minute for FAC, and then spent an hour making the changes (mostly deleting about 50 poor links) to justify my vote. Sfahey 04:33, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Template:Gbmapping
I have changed Template:Gbmapping so it looks like this. Please approve (or revert - as long as it gets discussed I shall be happy). -- RHaworth 18:11, 2005 Jan 29 (UTC)

fare zone x -> Zone x
Hi Chris. Good morning & hope you are well. I think I was trying to get an element of consistency. There are references to the zones on other tube pages and the text varies. I notice three of the zones have articles but they are inconsistently named: London Underground Zone 1, London Underground zone 2 and London Underground zone 6. There are also some redirects set up. Looking at at tube/rail map I see TfL use "Travelcard Zone" so I think changing to "Travelcard Zone x" for article names and all references to those articles would be the best thing all round. Mrsteviec 11:29, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Octopus card
Hi. I've moved Octopus card to WP:FAC. Can you take a look and see if you'd like to comment? Thanks. JuntungWu 06:49, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Current events
Hi hello, would you be interested to contribute to Current events in Hong Kong and Macao? You may also be interested to take a look at Wikipedia:HK wikipedians' notice board. best, &mdash; Instantnood 10:42, Feb 7 2005 (UTC)

1 E5 people
I created 1 E5 people a few days ago. The full set of "1 Ex people" articles sprang into existence very quickly but not a lot of pages are using them yet. -- RHaworth 18:11, 2005 Jan 29 (UTC)

No. It was not mistaken identity - I just failed to spell it out: I see that you have been editing geographic articles. When you are doing this you might care to take time to wrap appropriate order of magnitude links around any population figures you see. Just as I did down in Birmingham, Alabama.

But it's up to you and I have edited geographic articles without doing it! In any case I see your geographic interests run in a different direction so here are ...

Some crashes I remember

 * 24 October 1947 - Collision between two electric trains in dense fog near South Croydon - 31 dead and 63 injured or 32 dead and 183 injured. (My nearest railway station now. I was nowhere near there in 1947).
 * Hixon rail crash (new article). I remember this because:
 * I was working for English Electric in Stafford at the time
 * Subsequently I met Sam Hallas whose page I have linked to
 * I have a client called Tom Hixson
 * August 24 1999 - (Google search). Collision in the English Channel memorable for the names of the vessels - the Ever Decent not living up to its name by shattering the Norwegian Dream.

also
I hope you don't think I'm the idiot who cannot spell Haworth. Of course I did not - I know how to read an edit history. ... as someone brought up just over the hills from that place. I switched the telly on once and saw the unmistakeable (to you and I) view from near Holme Moss looking down the valley toward Holmfirth. Then a Tour de France type peleton came into view! It was most disconcerting - I kept expecting Compo, Foggy and Clegg to appear over the wall and interact with the cyclists in some way.

RHaworth 05:08, 2005 Feb 10 (UTC)

Hello
I am concerned about a vandal called "Mr Diaper". Is there any info on him? --219.77.246.151 11:51, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Marylebone Station
er .. there are *two* such-named stations; one on the tube, one overground. Have reverted the edits deleting 'tube'. Although, like other locations, they are adjacent they are two separate properties, owned by different companies, with different histories. To merge them therefore would (imho, obviously) be an error. --Vamp:Willow 11:20, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * indeed; I checked your recent edits after reverting the three pages and saw the massive list, so left alone to see what your consideration was. Have read the entry on the talk page and I think this is a symptom of a larger problem / issue (rolling of multiple articles into a single one where not copmletely appropriate). Will spend some time thinking about it tonight and post up a discussion in the next day or so. --Vamp:Willow 22:35, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Cotswolds
I wrote 'returned to the ... of their former lord-lieutenancies' meaning the areas thereof, not the people (tenancy not tenant). If you think it needs clarification, please be my guest. I'm pretty sure that was how it was done (it's what was recommended) - and the Avon L/L (Sir John Wills) lost that title, and we very occasionally see the Glos guy down in South Glos. (I'm in Thornbury, 2 miles south of the present county boundary)Linuxlad 08:45, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

National Rail Line colours
Hi Chris. I downloaded logos and images from the home pages of c2c and 'one' and took them into photoshop to check the colours used. I think in both these cases the colours are the same as on the map you are talking about - which would be a good standard. Mrsteviec 14:32, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Template:stn art 3lnk
Hi, Chris. Great to see you using this template. Just to point out quickly that I also have stn art lnk which was identical (until your perfectly OK mod). There is no reason for two templates - I did the '3lnk' version as a test, found it OK and copied it to the other. I was going to tidy things up. I have copied your mods over and made '3lnk' a redirect. I don't like the idea of templates that redirect but it seems to work. -- RHaworth 12:59, 2005 Mar 16 (UTC)

Reading Bridge
Chris, I've edited Reading Bridge to try out a possible box to tidy the upstream and downstream crossings - a la Railway lines next and previous station boxes, which now stretch from Paddington to Goring and beyond. I would value your opinion - is it any use? Does it need removing? Can it be rescued, edited, etc.? Let me know what you think. Many thanks, Ian Cairns 18:01, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Category main articles
There are special rules for the 'name' article of a category; it can (and should) still be in the base categories Chris, please can you provide a source for this guideline - I've checked the Wiki Category FAQs etc, but can't find this. Also, most articles seem to have any stubs above the categs and interwikis. Do you have a source for the placement of stubs after these? Many thanks, Ian Cairns 18:03, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Cross Country services
Any more thoughts on this stub? Linuxlad 20:07, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Duplication in Reading article
Hi Chris, the last couple of times you've edited the Reading, Berkshire article, you've managed to introduce duplication of entire sections. I've undone this, but you may wish to check a) that your intended edits are still there and b) what's going on to make the duplication happen. --Lancevortex 10:09, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Streetcar/Tram
I see you formerly discussed this split on Talk:Streetcar. There's a current discussion going on there now; I'd appreciate more opinions, no matter what side. Thanks. --SPUI (talk) 20:49, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you again - there's also a poll now on Talk:Metro about whether metro and subway should be merged. --SPUI (talk) 21:04, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park
Thanks for the note about the San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park page. I didn't change the title because the system wouldn't let me -- it said I hadn't had an account long enough (which was certainly true, I had only had an account for about 15 minutes). So I'm still trying to figure the system out -- please bear with me. Referencing an old name is fine, and I probably should have explained it, rather than just cut it out. Sorry about that. I was, obviously, on something of a "fixing the name" mission. I think a fair rule of thumb, though, is that since the name changed over 25 years ago, any source which uses that name probably has a significant amount of other incorrect information, as well. I have tried to add a little institutional history around the name to put it in context. Hope that works OK. I also fine-tuned how the Association's relationship to the park is stated (we also have a very active association for our library, which I should probably put a link to at some point). Just FYI, I work at the park, and would be happy to help answer questions or generally track down information/photos/etc. Lynn Cullivan 00:08, 4 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Greetings: I had not yet found your image when I uploaded mine, so I have cross linked the two and added some notes to yours concerning the background. Feel free to delete my comments on your image as you think appropriate. Best wishes, - Leonard G. 03:44, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

UK railway stations and Template:UK-depot-stub
Hi, I notice you're removing the UK-depot-stub tags from certain articles. Does "depot" mean something different in the U.K. than what I'm accustomed to using it for in North America? I want to use a word in the stub tag that's synonymous with "station", only I can't use "station" because that's been taken by TV and radio station stubs. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks, JYolkowski // talk 22:22, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
 * If I may be allowed to butt in here, yes: "depot" (pronounced "depp-oh") does have a different meaning in UK English, where it can mean a servicing point (e.g. a locomotive depot) or a place where goods are loaded/unloaded (a goods or freight depot) but not a passenger station. I'd therefore suggest something like "UK-railstation" instead -- Picapica 10:19, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

NYC
--Hi, what was your intention of breaking apart the intro just to add the heading "overview"? I think its pretty clear that for most large city articles the intro serves as the overview. I've also never heard of what you're calling the "convential position" of having those separate, and I think the article looks much worse now. --Jleon 18:21, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

--OK I understand what you're trying to do, but this created a lot of "negative space" by creating a mismatch in the placement of the contents and the main info box. Other large cities tend to have fairly large intros like New York's, and I can't imagine anyone giving up from thinking that is the entire article. --Jleon 18:52, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

Stagecoach London
Hi Chris, just to let you know someone has added a vote for deletion on the Stagecoach London article. I've already cast my vote against this, as I believe rolling up subsidiary company articles into corprate parent articles is a bad way to go. Thought you'd like to add your voice since you created the article in question.--Ayrshire--77 07:58, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

lots of edits, not an admin
Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 17:52, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)

Hi
Hi fellow wikipedian. Your name caught my eye - it's the same as mine! I'm also Chris J Wood (Christopher John Rex Wood by birth). I'm a software developer too - at least, I'm studying to become one :) ··gracefool |&#9786; 08:45, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Transportation in Burlington, N.C.
Hi, I noticed that you edited Burlington, North carolina. Have you ever been or lived here? I only ask because I do live here and I think it would be great to know that another Wikipedian is or has been so close to me! Jaberwocky6669 July 2, 2005 03:55 (UTC)

Stone Mountain
I like the changes you made to the Stone Mountain article. It was sounding like the national headquarters of the KKK instead of what it actually is (today, at least). The KKK stuff can be in there, but also it needs to have the train ride, the ride to the top, and other park attractions. Bubba73 19:54, July 19, 2005 (UTC)

Stone Mountain geology
Hi -- Nice work on the geological stuff! --Bcrowell 15:08, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedians in Berkshire
Nudge, nudge, wink, wink, say no more, say no more... Category:Wikipedians in Berkshire - Ian Cairns 19:33, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

Newcastle DAB
Please be aware of the importance of disambiguation. I have been trawling 50+ articles correcting links to Newcastle. It is sometimes very difficult to determine to which of the many Newcastles is being referred. Although the context of the article made it obvious, this DABing exercise was the motivation for my change on John Lewis Partnership. I have had to DAB the John Lewis Newcastle article too, so please be careful when making changes. This task is tiresome enough as it is without the same articles appearing back on the 'to do' list. The JPS 16:43, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Section order
Regarding the order of sections question here, my memory was a tad fuzzy: it's actually See also/References/External links as recommended by the Manual of Style; Standardized appendices also touches on this topic. The reason you often see References at the end is that some editors prefer it to External links and use it instead (personally, I think they serve different purposes). If there is an External links section, it seems clear it belongs at the very end. For me, this is largely a matter of J. Random Reader's expectations. --Dhartung | Talk 15:53, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

River Thames
Chris, I've reverted all your 180px pics on the River Thames article back to 250px. I don't why you made them so small, they don't look right so tiny (I have a 1024 by 768 screen) and 250px is a "standard" now for pics. In my view your picture size almost forces the reader to open the big pic, which can be a very slow business! I guess they'd look even tinier on a higher res screen than mine. Let me know why you like 180px on my talk page please. Best Wishes - Adrian Pingstone 17:47, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Apologies! I had no idea the default pic size could be varied. However it's surely best if the pic size is set at, say, 250px in the picture code itself. Most readers will know nothing about Prefs, will see small pics and will not know they could do something about it. Why not set the size to a reasonable value in the code? - Adrian Pingstone 22:14, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Huddersfield
Chris, I have reformatted the page, by moving the images around, to get a more stable layout, without overlapping boxes. Which I trust you will feel is more suitable. I've also removed the cleanup tag. Like you I also use firefox, though with some websites it does cause problems as the other user noted. I think the main problem is with having the large infobox at the top of the page. If you add together the pixel width of that plus the pixel width of images which may fall beside it, dependant on various screen res's there is bound to be a problem. Richard Harvey 16:38, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Martin Salter and the OULC
Chris, I have added some more information on this topic per your suggestion. Raoul2 12:17, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Unsourced template
There has been a long running discussion/poll at Template talk:Unreferenced over these issues, perhaps this discussion should be moved there. - SimonP 16:05, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


 * You're actually suggesting that articles should remain unsourced???? An article's popularity does not imply its factuality or verifiability. &mdash; BRIAN 0918 &bull; 2005-12-1 17:00


 * Can you keep the discussion together at your talk page, Brian0918? JDR


 * You call these articles "perfectly good" but what is your basis for this statement? Did you read any of them? What makes you think that a reader who has been told by media sources that Wikipedia is not to be trusted will also believe that those articles are "perfectly good"? &mdash; BRIAN 0918 &bull; 2005-12-1 20:08

Parishes
Thanks for the work on parishes. Am about to reply on Talk:Ashwellthorpe and Fundenhall once I've checked my facts... Morwen - Talk 16:54, 5 December 2005 (UTC)


 * And I've now compiled a list of parishes to have been renamed, deleted and added between the earliest available parish list the ONS provide (april 2001) and the latest (year end 2004) - at User:Morwen/parish_delta. Morwen - Talk 19:07, 5 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Merging makes sense here, I'm not particularly bothered what to. Btw, have you seen my insane parish project page at User:Morwen/alldab ?  Morwen - Talk 12:13, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Yes, going through them roughly in alphabetical order. I'm on the Bs already, so it's actually going quite well.  The original reason was just to make sure that every parish was disambiguated properly (hence the name of the page), but I got rather distracted.


 * Two reasons. Firstly, so that it is easy to visually inspect the tables to make sure they are blue links.  Secondly, so that if people do use such links, they work.  Most of them are probably orphans, but you never know.  I'd like to see dab links come up green or something, like redlinks for missing pages, which would make both those things redundant.  But that doesn't seem likely to happen soon.   If I wasn't doing this project I wouldn't be making them.  Morwen - Talk 12:44, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Sources for Caversham Lock
Hello, good work on Caversham Lock, and thanks for the contribution. However, you did not provide any references or sources in the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. From what websites, books, or other places did you learn the information that you added to Caversham Lock? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? You can simply add links, or see WP:CITET if you wish to review some of the different citation methods. Thanks! Lupin|talk|popups 23:18, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Hectares
Please feel free to revert User:Bobblewik's changes from hectares to square kilometers. It is a personal quest of his to banish hectares from Wikipedia regardless of how many other people use them or support using them in discussions. Rmhermen 21:09, 11 December 2005 (UTC)