User talk:Chris troutman/Archive 13

Thanks
Hello Chris, thanks for taking care of Wikipedia. I fully understand your point. Let's wait to see if someone at Xapo or other interested party comes now and change it to Switzerland again ... Best Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoodCorporate (talk • contribs) 17:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

104.231.148.179
Ciao bello! I'm not able to report someone (so i can't do anything) but if this IP 104.231.148.179 strikes again vould you do something? They've vandalized pages and I'm considering that they are young (possibly a child or misunderstanding pre-teen) that doesn't understand how Wikipedia works. Dinah In Wonderland 23:05, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If you spot vandalism, you can revert it and report it just the same as any of us can. I'm aware of that IP but I'm generally not in the business of stalking editors. I encourage you to learn how to perform countervandalism. If you have doubts about something you find, you can always ping me. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:17, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Okay! And I actually can't report (I have the mobile view -_-) so when I tried it wasn't available but I'll keep that in mind. Maybe I'll learn in the morning if I remember or have the time to log in. Dinah In Wonderland 00:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Robin Fontes
IronGargoyle (talk) 12:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Syrian Civil War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Syrian Civil War. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Rubbish computer
I have an arrangement with. I mess up his user page and he gets to hassle me on mine. This activity removes all temptation to become a vandal. This pent up emotional problem of mine led to the writing of Squirrel-sponsored cyberterrorism. I believe RC has taken on the task of being my life coach along with you, of course. There is an edit-a-thon coming up. Interested? Best Regards,
 * Bfpage (talk) 22:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * "I mess up his user page and he gets to hassle me on mine." You make no statement on your user page for third-party editors to know this, so it looks like vandalism to me. Obviously, I don't approve of using Wikipedia to deal with a "pent up emotional problem". I was unaware of an upcoming edit-a-thon. There are specific methods to advertise such. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:51, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Where do I put a notice on my user page to let 'third parties' know it is okay to leave little edits there. Is there a template for that. The folks organizing the edit-a-thon are very new users and don't know how to promote the event. I'll have to do it for them. It has to do with creating content on black, women labor leaders. That's all I know for now.
 * The Highest of Regards,
 * Bfpage (talk) 00:56, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I've seen other userpages say that specifically, although I can't remember which ones. I went looking for a template and couldn't find it. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 21:32, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

White Anglo-Saxon Protestant
I think that Danteday and I have resolved the problem on the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant page. Rjensen gave us an external reference to work from. All of the names on that list are in the source. I am going to revert your edit, include additional names, and attach the reference to it. Jonah161 (talk) 13:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * See my reply at Talk:White Anglo-Saxon Protestant. In the future, you do not revert me. You know apparently nothing about Wikipedia so if I made a change, rest assured I knew what I was doing. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:09, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

user page review
I had a notification that you had reviewed my user page at User:Nyth83/GMT_T1XX. I have not seen this before. What was the purpose of this?
 * Ah, nevermind. I just saw your response to Dinah above about a similar question. Thanks! Nyth  63  23:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Anarchyte • GeneralizationsAreBad • Cullen328 (first RfA to reach WP:300)
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Cprompt • Rockpocket • Rambo's Revenge • Animum • TexasAndroid • Chuck SMITH • MikeLynch • Crazytales • Ad Orientem

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a series of discussions around new pages patrol, the WMF is helping implement a controlled autoconfirmed article creation trial as a research experiment, similar to the one proposed in 2011. You can learn more about the research plan at meta:Research:Autoconfirmed article creation trial. The exact start date of the experiment has yet to be determined.
 * A new speedy deletion criterion, regarding articles created as a result undisclosed paid editing, is currently being discussed (permalink).
 * An RfC (permalink) is currently open that proposes expanding WP:G13 to include all drafts, even if they weren't submitted through Articles for Creation.

Technical news
 * LoginNotify should soon be deployed to the English Wikipedia. This will notify users when there are suspicious login attempts on their account.
 * The new version of XTools is nearing an official release. This suite of tools includes administrator statistics, an improved edit counter, among other tools that may benefit administrators. You can report issues on Phabricator and provide general feedback at mw:Talk:XTools.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello
What is the meaning of this?

''(Page curation log); 04:56. . Chris troutman (talk | contribs) marked User:Maxim Pouska/BangBang test pages as reviewed''

I am working too much in RL at this time and can not finish the artikel at this moment. Only in Novembre I try to start again. I have more information and sourches, which I researched, to make it better. As a German I try still to learn the rouls at wp:en. Best.--Maxim Pouska (talk) 19:47, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries! Because of the Wikipedia Seigenthaler biography incident, New Pages Patrol (of which I am a part) checks up on new pages like your user sandbox to make sure you're not accusing an innocent person of assassinating a president or some such. You don't need to take any action and it doesn't impact your editing, at all. We seek to review every page across Wikipedia but new pages are constantly being created. There's no rush on your progress in sandbox. We're just trying to make sure there's not content violating our Terms of Use or policy. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:55, 1 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Ok and thanks for your work.--Maxim Pouska (talk) 19:58, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Texas Fact Checker
You have less patience than I. You also apparently have more experience dismissing the people who deserve it. This guy is a pot stirrer. If he (and I'm sure the editor is male) doesn't understand that but is a conjunction that indicates a comparison, I'm never gonna get him to understand NPOV or primary sources. He doesn't bother to sign anything either.

What to do?

The article is substandard, and vaguely libelous. I really have no interest in rewriting the bio of a Texas state assemblyman. If I did though, I fear it will just get reverted. The other option is to PROD it or AfD it. I imagine that an encyclopedia entry should be like an obituary ... or like a skirt. Short enough to be interesting, but long enough to cover the important bits. No matter what, the article must demonstrate decorum. I guess that's what NPOV means. I don't see a video of a drunk guy as that interesting -- except to embarrass him, like Billy Bush did Trump.

Help me out here and I'll take your advice. Rhadow (talk) 00:22, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The article in question in already being PROD'd. Unless someone decides to save it, it's going to be gone in seven days. I read your userpage and I don't share your inclusionism. You might join the WP:RESCUE. I belong to WP:ADELS. Even if that article isn't going to be deleted it's been hit with maintenance templates and I don't know if those are going to be fixed before election day. The other articles that editor created are on fire, too. He seems to be a partisan and as you say the assumption is that "where there is smoke there is fire." because a little extra water and retardant never hurt anyone seriously. I'm not dealing with him because he doesn't realize he's using a broken ping. He's here for the biographies. Make the biographies go away and he'll be gone, too. If he were a true believer on a kick about immunizations causing illness then this would be a problem to deal with directly. This time, it's nothing to deal with. I also disagree with your skirt analogy. The last article I wrote is Robin Fontes. I wrote all I could with every good source I could find. I want to be complete, fair, and thorough. Active politicians deserve better than sporadic coverage that reads like either a hagiography or an AA meeting. Really, from a historical perspective we shouldn't be writing about any person until they've been dead 50 years. I wonder if Wikipedia would accept getting rid of all articles about living people? I recommend you just sit this out from here. There's nothing gained by engaging with this clown and you don't need to act on the content. Your job was done by posting at COIN. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 03:28, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Joseph Stalin
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joseph Stalin. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Misunderstanding ?
Hi, I just saw your warnings and I am surprised by your comments since I added just one historical scientific work of late Serbian historian, university professor Sima Ćirković who was a well known scholar and member of several academic institutions in Europe. How can adding such references be qualified in the way you did? Please, take a look at the source I added:. That is relevant scholarly material, by all standards. Sorabino (talk) 14:16, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not making any judgement about the book. What you're doing looks like WP:BOOKSPAM because if anything, that book is further reading, not a reference. What we would prefer is for you to read the book and add inline citations specifying the page numbers where the book supports claims in the article. Really, only books that are cited in-line should be listed. Just because you like a book or that you think it's applicable doesn't mean it should be listed. Wikipedia is not a list of books on a subject nor a place to promote said books. I make reversions like this often enough because authors are trying to sell their book. I reverted you, applying the same rule. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 14:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, I understand you now, but your edits and warnings came just few minutes after I added that source, with intention on working on several articles on Serbian-Bulgarian relations. I used that book in various articles for referencing historical contents as was my intention here, but you stopped me after I made first steps. I added that book in several articles related to Serbian-Bulgarian relations simply because it is easier that way. That is why it looked like spamming! Can I continue editing, article by article? This is one of my articles: Serbian Patriarchate of Peć, I am trying to do serious editing. Sorabino (talk) 15:00, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I encourage you to edit. My warnings (like all warnings) are meant to stop problematic behavior. I've never seen anyone spam a source onto a bunch of articles and then edit them. Usually, editors add the sources as they add the matching content. Good luck to you. Hopefully your edits don't continue to look like vandalism. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 15:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks. I will continue editing article by article, to avoid any future misunderstandings. Sorabino (talk) 15:57, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello Sorabino -- I pretend that we are out of earshot of Chris troutman. My advice to you after looking at the various threads and your pages, is to step back, relax, and let the encyclopedia develop as it has for sixteen years. You describe, "This is one of my articles." No. it isn't. It's a group effort and you help. Your choice to have so many addenda doesn't help the reader. If a source is relevant, it needs to support a sentence in the article text, otherwise it's just part of a list of thousands of pages of extra reading a WP reader will never look at. If you want to publish your own history book, you have two choices: go to a publisher where a paid editor will kick you, or self-publish, in which case you can do anything you want. If you want to contribute to WP, please do it in the way thousands of others do and has proven to work (if imperfectly at times). The example I learned from was my own mistake: I added a link to an article, it turned red, then I used that as a path into a blank page. I was chastised for that. It seemed reasonable to me. When someone explained that it caused the WP engine to overheat, I stopped doing it. Every revision of an article should stand as an internally consistent version. We don't insert incomplete content with the expectation of returning to fix it. BTW, it seems you are well versed in your subjects. Thanks for being part of the team. Rhadow (talk) 16:13, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Trump campaign–Russian meeting
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trump campaign–Russian meeting. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Kazakhstan in popular culture
I respect your work here, but deletion is not for cleaning up articles, and we don't delete an article merely because you don't like it or even if it's offensive. So I removed your prod tag. Take it to WP:AfD. Bearian (talk) 20:58, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. I hope you put Old prod full on the applicable talk page. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 21:46, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! While I appreciate your praise very much, I hear in the background the faint screaming of a hundred Wikipedians shouting "Don't encourage him!" I've always thought being forthright was praiseworthy but I will struggle to prevent my words from being thoughtless or cruel. I may alienate the developers at WMF with my words and that won't help anyone. I will try not to let you down. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:27, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Notice I said I don't always agree with you . I think there is room in civil discourse for forthrightness and for talking in understatement. I prefer the latter but also appreciate the former, so I thought it worth letting you know :). TonyBallioni (talk) 00:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Arguments
You need to make arguments on talk pages, not just drive-by tag. I'm going to revert your things that aren't backed up by the rules or by even making a simple one sentence argument. #fail Flatoncsi (talk) 17:44, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If you continue to revert my edits just because you're a sad person, you will suffer consequences. Please be a constructive editor. We have too many clowns and vandals, already. You don't have to be one, too. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 21:45, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not vandalizing anything, I'm reverting your deletion of good references. You're going through these pages and making them worse by mass-tagging and reducing the quality of these articles. You are hurting this overall project by deleting references and then having a bad attitude about being called out for it. You delete things without even citing a rule. Then you delete controversial things without moving it to the talk page. You need to learn and follow the rules. Flatoncsi (talk) 22:23, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Since you clearly don't know "the rules" (WP:NPOL, WP:BOOKSPAM, WP:CIRCULAR, WP:BRD) how would you judge my ability to apply them? I've been editing for four years. I improved an article to good article status. Please tell me what I don't know based upon your vast experience. I'll wait. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:50, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Wow, four whole years, I just can't imagine why we aren't all bowing to your editing prowess, Chris. In the meantime, between genuflections, perhaps you can stop deleting good references on pages and stop tagging things without adding to the talk pages. Flatoncsi (talk) 23:03, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * My point being, you'll be gone tomorrow (or shortly thereafter). I am perfectly happy having fun with you until you give up. I've seen your type show up, complain, and leave. You've taken longer than the usual time to complain which means you really want attention. I'm still waiting for you to answer my question and perhaps tell me what I don't know. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 23:32, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm here to edit and contribute, not to bantz back and forth with you. Glad you're having fun. Flatoncsi (talk) 15:46, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you buddy
Thank you for reviewing my user page buddy! I appreciate it! :) Pancakes654 20:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC) Pancakes654 20:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pancakes654 (talk • contribs)

Please comment on Talk:Film censorship in China
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Film censorship in China. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

SuNaW
hi.you gave sрeedy nomination to my рage.i am new in wikiрedia.and i think i will imрrove my edits.dont delete my рage — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuNaW (talk • contribs) 20:29, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Question regarding Notability
Hi Chris, you put a notability notice on Selling LA. there are two shows in the same franchise, the episodes often appear on TV interchangeably. Selling New York is an affiliated show with Selling LA. Both shows are tremendously popular in the US and have been renewed for multiple seasons. Both on the same channel and have same producers. Selling New York has had its own Wikipedia page since 2010. I assumed that if the east coast version in NEW YORK has a Wikipedia page for so many years--I'm unclear, isn't it reasonable to assume that the west coast version in Los Angeles is equally notable?? When I saw NY but not LA, I created the missing page for Los Angeles. Can you check out both pages and help me understand why one may be notable, but not the other? What am I not seeing? I would greatly appreciate your input and advice.Thank you! Mbarywiki (talk) 09:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * "isn't it reasonable to assume that the west coast version in Los Angeles is equally notable??" No, it's not. I've since tagged the other article; they both probably ought to be deleted. Your argument is addressed in WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. Sadly, it's very common for new editors to determine what is right or allowable based upon what they see on other pages. The problem with that is that Wikipedia has grown beyond our community's ability to keep up with the junk people deposit here. The two notability guidelines for these subjects are WP:TVSHOW (which is specific for TV shows and requires secondary sources) and WP:GNG (which requires significant coverage in secondary sources). Each article only has a link to HGTV, which is the network airing the show and therefore not independent. This often happens when fans want to use Wikipedia to write about their favorite thing. To best learn about Wikipedia, please read the many policies, guidelines, and essays which define our community's norms. Start at any of the ones I've linked to and you can click your way to the others. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 15:35, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

User:Chris troutman I am a professor on the subject of media, I also write for many newspapers and have been a journalist for over twenty years. I teach media and communications at one of the top schools in the state. So when someone refers to my ideas as "crap" or "junk" posted by a "fan" -- that is a first. I find it curious that no one had a problem with Selling NY for seven years. If look past your choice of words (calling my work crap and junk) it sounds to me like you are asking for more sources. No problem. I should be able to add more sources.Mbarywiki (talk) 19:24, 17 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Please take a deep breath and re-read what I wrote. I can imagine how it feels when your editing draws a lot of unwanted attention. I've had a couple days where I dreaded seeing my notifications. Wikipedia is an interconnected community and when you come up on one editor's radar, you inevitably come to the notice of others, too. (By the way, the history tab shows all your edits to this page. You would be best served by thinking before typing or at least striking the comments you want to retract per WP:REFACTOR.) I see you're already in a huff, but the shortcut is OTHERCRAPEXISTS. I didn't call your writing crap. I said that essay is where your argument is addressed. Further on that point, Wikipedia is written by dilettantes, like you. Unlike Twitter, we don't have "verified" users so you can't bring your prior experience or education as a qualifier for your editing. Wikipedia was founded with some amount of disdain for professionals so we don't give editors with qualifications any respect beyond what we extend to all good-faith editors. That said, adding more sources is exactly what that article needs. Note that I haven't nominated either article for deletion, I only tagged them for questionable notability. We have a lot of inclusionist editors and I'm not sure I could push both of those articles through WP:AFD. Tagging an article for needed improvement is not a threat or sleight. You're welcome to improve articles as you see fit. Because we are always flooded with editors hiding a conflict of interest, we remain on guard for promotional-looking articles, especially since we're unpaid, un-thanked volunteers struggling to restrain people getting a paycheck for their edits. You might also check out our editing community in Los Angeles. They're very active and can help you out in-person at one of their events. You might find their assistance helpful to what you're trying to do. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:38, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

User:Chris troutman Thank you, and your feedback is very kind, and more than fair and reasonable. Much respect. I will work on adding the citations and references, as you proposed, this weekend. I agree that entertainment is not the most important category of articles, but the "arts" do have a place in our society. The wide variety of Wikipedia is what makes it so fascinating. Thank you again for the directions, and I will do my very best. Much respect. Mbarywiki (talk) 21:37, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Massacre of Verden
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Massacre of Verden. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 23
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 23, June-July 2017

 Chinese, Arabic and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta! Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Library card
 * User Group update
 * Global branches update
 * Spotlight: Combating misinformation, fake news, and censorship
 * Bytes in brief

ANI report
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Amortias (T)(C) 22:46, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Some things I've noticed over the years (calm advice, not a patronizing rebuke)
New users rarely don't read the whole template. Hell, no one does. I'm pretty sure some folks only use them as tally markers on obvious block targets and not as actual communication.

Some users can be n00bs for an inordinately long time, especially with parts of the site they don't use often. There's a reason I have not made any range blocks. >_>

Users with higher level education (real or claimed) usually need things explained the simplest. I don't know if it's because they've stopped doing real research and don't know how to write anymore, or if they're just making it up, but most of them can be redirected to behave as if we don't care about credentials.

Users who have a problem with plagiarism usually need to hear the words "summarize and paraphrase."

I hope I'm not being too annoying with this, I'm just trying to prevent any potential argument of "no one warned/blocked/atomized Chris" so the ANI thread can be closed.

Ian.thomson (talk) 23:20, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Got it. You've given me more consideration than I've given to the other editor, and I thank you. Still, that editor has "bad faith" written all over them. I don't think Wikipedia is a better place for suffering his ilk and I'm trying to protect Wikipedia. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 01:48, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * ++Chris, hope you're doing well. I've interacted with Ian before and we both have had our chances to deal with irreverent editors at the Help Desk I recall even thanking Ian in the past for rebuking an editor who asked a silly uncivil question at the Help Desk. Imo, Ian's perspective here is sound. I've interacted with you also previously and have followed your work around, and in my opinion, you're one of the best here. I am sure your words and actions are followed by editors who were newbies just sometime before. So don't let one newbie editor take your patience off. Not worth your peace of mind and not worth the time you take to improve the project. It's a pleasure to see your name around at different places on the project. Warmly as always.  Lourdes  03:05, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cold War II
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cold War II. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
 * Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Change to RfC at NOT
You participated at this RfC; the proposal has changed a bit. Just providing you notice of that. Jytdog (talk) 17:32, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

2017Au24: Addition to Deus vult reverted by Chris_troutman
Hi Chris,

(This is my first entry in someone's User_talk page :-) )

Believe your reversion yesterday of the following addition to Deus vult was a bit strict/restrictive: Deus le volt is the version used by Frankish Crusaders in Russell Hoban's novel Pilgermann.

My reasons for the addition:

-Hoban is a scholarly & important author and the novel includes a bibliography. I trust that his spelling is historicly accurate.

-Yet another version/spelling of 'Deus vult' reflects the evolution of western european languages (eg: french & german) occuring during the medieval period.

-Pilgermann is an excellent novel that revolves around the religious arrogance (and the resulting hatred/bloodshed) that the phrase 'Deus vult' expresses. Maybe readers of this article would be intrigued to read it.

Hoping you change your mind.

Thanks TBond (talk) 23:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * You present no citations for your claims. Neither the article about Hoban nor the article about Pilgermann bear out your claims. (I've thought long and hard about trying to get the article about the book deleted.) I'm not sold. I am glad that you posted to my user talk. Discussions with other editors is necessary for progress. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:23, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Transition Design
Chris, I'm responding to your reply on DGG's page here. We will have to think about whether or not we want to take this further. To be honest, we're quite surprised at the lack of cordiality and respect we've encountered in the correspondence thusfar.Terry Irwin (talk) 23:31, 26 August 2017 (UTC)Terry Irwin
 * Yeah, that happens pretty often. Please, let me meet you for lunch. I think I could help you understand what we're doing and try to crosswalk your effort. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 23:40, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Chris, thanks for the offer. Can we offer to buy you lunch here next week or the following? Terry Irwin (talk) 23:49, 26 August 2017 (UTC)Terry Irwin

WikiProject Investment
Cheers. WikiEditCrunch (talk) 00:04, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Badme
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Badme. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Please refrain from editing on User talk:71.250.208.140 because they have been reverted. If you want to know how Wikipedia works, please use the sanbox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1001:B009:7160:2D86:E08:3A30:7D6B (talk) 12:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 September newsletter
Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

FYI
I am still in the middle of the article and will be editing by adding those other universities that offer training in this topic. Unfortunately, sometimes I have to stop editing for a short period of time to eat lunch. Best Regards. Barbara (WVS) ✐   ✉  17:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * While I understand, please think of the fact that every edit we make is public. If every edit you make is defensible, it won't be questioned. If edit A looks bad until edit B happens, you might have stalkers get in your business. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:59, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, of course. But bad faith is assumed in that case because my editing history demonstrates my consistent habit proving B in a few moments, especially if there is a tag at the top of the article that states the article is under construction. Every single edit I make is defensible. Thanks for weighing in because I truly appreciate your perspective. The Very Best of Regrds, Barbara — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1016:b115:76cc:bc7e:74d9:473d:fdb8 (talk • contribs) 07:56, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Nakon • Scott
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Sverdrup • Thespian • Elockid • James086 • Ffirehorse • Celestianpower • Boing! said Zebedee

Guideline and policy news
 * ACTRIAL, a research experiment that restricts article creation to autoconfirmed users, will begin on September 7. It will run for six months. You can learn more about the research specifics at meta:Research:Autoconfirmed article creation trial, while Wikipedia talk:Autoconfirmed article creation trial is probably the best venue for general discussion.
 * Following an RfC, WP:G13 speedy deletion criterion now applies to any page in the draftspace that has not been edited in six months. There is a bot-generated report, updated daily, to help identify potentially qualifying drafts that have not been submitted through articles for creation.

Technical news
 * You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
 * Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
 * In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

Arbitration
 * Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Plural of "ABS" is the same as the plural of "ATM" ("ATMs"), etc.
Why status quo? Since when is it "wrong" to pluralize "ABS" like any other initialism, such as "ATMs"?

174.23.105.242 (talk) 22:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Per WP:STATUSQUO: "During a dispute, until a consensus is established, the status quo should remain". The onus is on you, the editor making a change. You were reverted and per WP:BRD, you should discuss the matter to resolution not insist on the version you want. I take no position about how one pluralizes ABS but you need to seek consensus. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:44, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you...so many guidelines to learn. I've got an idea. Can you send me a reading list of policies/guidelines/essays that you think would help? Nothing exhaustive, but you seem to be more familiar with wp stuff than I am. Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐   ✉  22:47, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Nazism sidebar
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Nazism sidebar. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Discuss
Hello, I have big trouble to find informations regarding article Utopia (Deen album) about visible Oricon peak charts on online websites. In past they've used to have them visible everywhere, but it has changed recently and only releases since 2006 have visible peak chart and charting length (weeks). I'm sorry sir but I don't know where else I'm supposed to obtain informations about this. I'm not Japanese, after all so it's difficult for me to find any other reliable source than Oricon. Qucipuci0 —Preceding undated comment added 23:58, 30 July 2017

Fat Leonard scandal
I didn't change "The 6-foot-3-inch, 350-pound Malaysian playboy" to "He" because it was untrue. I changed it because the tone is unencyclopedic. 104.129.196.161 (talk) 17:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * That's questionable. If you don't like the tone (which is a fair critique) then that's a talk page discussion. Further, you didn't use an edit summary to indicate your reasoning. Wikipedia is a collaborative project and you are obliged to communicate with your fellow editors. I'm willing to consider your argument, but I'll happily revert unexplained deletions. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:03, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Questionable that the tone is not appropriate or that that was my intention? Either way, I've started a discussion on the article talk page. 104.129.196.161 (talk) 16:35, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Questionable that the tone is an issue; I understand your intention to have the article be factual but inoffensive. Thanks for starting the discussion. I've made my point there and I'll follow whatever the consensus decides. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Poorly sourced material at a Biography of a Living Person
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Dan Huberty. Thank you. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 20:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hurricane Irma
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hurricane Irma. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

07:49:50, 11 September 2017 review of submission by 31.87.153.57

 * Subject seems to fail WP:NFOOTY, WP:GNG, and WP:NCORP. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 07:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

NFL Owner Net Worth
Hey Chris I got a message saying you changed something in my sandbox where I am making the NFL Owner Net Worth page but I cannot figure out what it is you changed. Any thoughts on the page while I'm here? I'm still debating whether or not it is even worth having this page, but I had an hour free the other day so I was playing around with it. There is a page devoted to the net worth of all the US Presidents so I figure it might be along the same lines. Zdawg1029 (talk) 17:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I reviewed your sandbox a couple days ago, so I didn't actually change anything. Because of the Wikipedia Seigenthaler biography incident, New Pages Patrol (of which I am a part), seeks to put a set of eyes on every page created to ensure the new page isn't accusing a lawyer of conspiring to assassinate government officials or something like that. We get people that make pages to attack people they hate, or advertise for a company, etc. and we take action when the content is problematic. By marking that sandbox "reviewed" I indicate it's nothing problematic and I remove it from the review queue. You don't need to take any action on that. As for your effort, you might add that data to List of NFL franchise owners, although I think that list is restricted to current owners. You could always ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject American football. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:07, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

YWCA edit-a-thon in Pittsburgh
Hello and happy September! Just wanted to let you know there's an edit-a-thon happening at the Pittsburgh YWCA to add info about under-represented women in Pittsburgh's history. More info here. If you know someone who might be interested, please spread the word! --TheLeaper (talk) 17:29, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi. Thanks for letting me know about this. Did you have a plan for the meetup page and geonotice? I'm not familiar with your experience in organizing edit-a-thons. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:37, 5 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the response! I'm not organizing it, but it's being done by some former colleagues from the library. They have a Rapid Grant page, but I'm not sure about geonotice or anything else. I will put them in touch if they could use a hand! --TheLeaper (talk) 17:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi Chris! I am a former colleague of TheLeaper and on the Young Leaders Board of the YWCA/ helping to organize the event. I have not previously been directly involved with organizing an editathon so have no experience with the meetup page or geonotices. Is this the meetup page you're referring to: Meetup/Pittsburgh. I'd be happy to add some information to that page and if you have any other suggestion's about getting the word out we'd welcome them!FrindleandInk (talk) 17:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Fat Leonard
I would appreciate it if you would read what I'd left on the Talk page for the article. Thanks. Activist (talk) 00:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Miscarriage and grief
Much deleting of content going on here. Advice? Barbara (WVS) ✐   ✉  01:01, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Some advice
I strongly urge you to be aware of WP:GANG. There is a lot going on here, and really -- you are wading into very, very troubled waters. Jytdog (talk) 01:08, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Your behavior looks like harassment to me, and I'm uninvolved. I just want to keep the peace. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 01:12, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I understand what you are saying. You are not correct and what is worse, you are not asking questions to try to understand what is going on. Jytdog (talk) 01:13, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Precious four years!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:02, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:David Ferrie
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:David Ferrie. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, Chris. Thanks for fixing my signature here. The extra "~" was inadvertent. Cheers! -Location (talk) 18:59, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!
 * The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: 
 * On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
 * Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Pure Insurance
I wrote the article because the company was referenced in the New York Times the other day. I looked for information and it seems to be one of those firms who operates under the radar serving an elite client base. Am I now supposed to ask permission or make a justification to start an article? &#39;&#39;Paul, in Saudi&#39;&#39; (talk) 01:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I was trying to be collegial. The article is nominated for deletion. I couldn't see any claim of notability and was curious why you'd write an article like that. You've answered my question. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 04:06, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Please let me know if I can be of any help.&#39;&#39;Paul, in Saudi&#39;&#39; (talk) 04:39, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Deus vult. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 69.121.8.140 (talk) 18:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * Please do something about it. I'm lonely. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:27, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

You can stop being a smartass now.69.121.8.140 (talk) 18:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not. You want to resolve this before you're blocked? Discuss your POV on the article's talk page or report me to any number of drama boards. We have administrators handing out free Wikipedia boomerangs to participants today. Go get yours now! Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:32, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

AfC and notability of populated places
Hi, just a note re this decline of an AfC submission. Villages, like other legally recognised populated places, are considered notable by default, see WP:GEOLAND. The article only needs a source indicating the village exists. – Uanfala 20:32, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * You are mistaken. NGEO says "Unreliable sources such as Facebook and most blogs or YouTube videos should be avoided when establishing the verifiability or notability of a geographical feature." The single source provided in the draft, soki.in, says on their main page that it "is a personal blog of Vasthu Consultant Renganath living at Chennai". The source fails WP:SPS and WP:RS, therefore the subject does not yet pass NGEO. I agree, if the source were reliable then a populated place would be presumed notable. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, in this case, the decline of the AfC at least shouldn't have used the boilerplate text that talks about significant coverage in independent sources. Although in practice, verifying the existence of the village in a reliable sources is a fairly trivial task. I guess I'll have to take up the task of moving the article into mainspace and apologising/explaining to the original contributor. – Uanfala 06:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * AFCH throws on the boilerplate. Sometimes I'll give a thorough explanation of what the draft is lacking. This time I was more terse and sometimes I leave no comment, at all. Thanks for engaging with the original contributor. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 14:27, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Mistakes were made
Yes. You are correct that I could have expressed myself better on ansh's talk page. I'm sorry on that point. I do think it is fair to criticize opposes just as it would be fair to criticize supporters, however. My criteria are far simpler than yours: don't be a jerk, have a clue. I'm fine with accepting criticism on them being more lenient than most people think they should be, and I think it is also fair to critique oppose rationales, it's a question of the right way of doing it. I appreciate your calling me out on ansh's talk page: my words were meant in good humour at the beginning of what is a tough experience for many people, but I can see that it would have been better to express differently. All the best. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

FYI
The instructor is well aware of and the students are instructed to create individual accounts. However, as long as we have the annoying 'security' lock preventing creation of more then a dozen or so accounts from the same IP for a day or so, classes where the instructor has over a dozen students will have to use a shared account or IPs for a day or two, until the students who were too slow and got an error message can go home and create accounts individually. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * We have this issue sometimes at edit-a-thons. The solution has been to have a Wikipedian with "account creator" help create the other accounts, since it's unlikely students would create their account a day or two prior. A campus ambassador would be well-suited to this task. Anytime we make short-cuts around rules, it gives the community the impression that the rules are being ignored. As a talk page stalker, I don't know why these students are doing this; I only know they've run afoul of WP:SHAREDACCOUNT, which is a policy. Thanks for your reply. Good luck with your class. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, as an instructor I probably qualify for the 'account creator' right. Any idea how to apply for it? Due to poor security on the classroom comps I'd need to ask for it for my official sock User:Hanyangprofessor2 though. If I could help them create accounts in class after we run into the IP block it would solve this issue easily. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:23, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * See Requests for permissions/Account creator. You should have no problem getting it and then the issue will be resolved. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 03:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Norse religion
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Norse religion. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hi Chris, thank you for your comments at my RfA. I hope that I'll be able to answer your concerns with my actions rather than my words. Cheers, ansh 666 23:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Just saying thanks
I do not want to bother you, but I missed a "thanks"-possibility for your edits, hinting TonyBallioni to his snot-nosed-ness in commenting on negative !votes in the last RfA, sadly typical for far too many admins.

I won't bother you any further on this matter, so there is no need for closing this, as I have seen on another occasion. Friendly regards, Purgy (talk) 07:53, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Another question about enclosure
on my exploration I encountered this:-

Harmondsworth is mentioned in Domesday Book, its name coming from the Anglo-Saxon Heremōdes worþ, meaning "Heremōd's enclosure", or Heremundes worþ, meaning "Heremund's enclosure".

both of these were linked to enclosure;

enclosure says : Enclosure (sometimes inclosure) was the legal process in England during the 18th century of enclosing a number of small landholdings to create one larger farm.

but the Domesday Book was written in 1086

I encountered something else like this: a reference to a name that means old english 'enclosure in a wood'

I think even in the context of history and law, enclosure might have slightly different meanings (e.g. theres a term in old english going back to 1086, and an event in the C18th...)

Have I understood this correctly or not?

MfortyoneA (talk) 14:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * You've not understood correctly. The lede is wrong. The first paragraph of the article past the lede says "Enclosure of manorial common land was authorized by the Statute of Merton (1235) and the Statute of Westminster (1285)." That's hundreds of years before the 18th Century, so you failed to read the article. Further, enclosure was something that happened more than once during the Middle Ages. You shouldn't edit in areas you don't understand. Finally, an 'enclosure in a wood' could mean something else. It doesn't matter to the move discussion. I am glad that I have your attention now. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 14:17, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * But it doesn't say that. it says Enclosure (sometimes inclosure) was the legal process in England during the 18th century of enclosing a number of small landholdings to create one larger farm, so if it later says something else, it's contradicting itself. The first line could carry the most salient information, then you refine it. MfortyoneA (talk) 14:21, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The precise use of language can expose inconsistencies. The mechanisms of redirects etc can increase precision. lets get this cleaned up, so that it isn't so misleading. MfortyoneA (talk) 14:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * >>"Finally, an 'enclosure in a wood' could mean something else" ... oh, absolutely. Which is why making more specific redirects is a great idea, to clear up *exactly* what it means. It's also why making this plain word enclosure be another more specific thing is a bad idea. MfortyoneA (talk) 14:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * No, you seem to lack the education in the field to make that determination. It's not my concern at present. Wikipedia is a volunteer service. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 14:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * hahaha. wikipedia is supposed to teach you. Re-word it so it's less confusing. Making it say 'enclosure' is one thing, then another, is simply terrible communication. If it isn't an 18th century event, then the first line shouldn't say that it is. Lets get this sorted. MfortyoneA (talk) 14:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 14:34, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

suggestion.
instead of deleting the redirects, why not help by using them to target information more accurately? That's the point of hypertext surely. MfortyoneA (talk) 14:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * You're abusing redirects and creating no real content in the encyclopedia, so no, I won't be helping you. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 14:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

I Understand
Yes, you are correct that some of my articles have not been the best in terms of notability, and I apologize for that. That is also why I realized that I should let Articles for deletion/2014 Astana Defender of the Fatherland Day Parade happen. What I don't agree with however is that all of my articles are most are poorly-sourced. In fact, some of my articles should have been made a long time ago. I understand where you are coming from, but just understand that not all of the articles are bad. I wish you all the best. Aa372798 (talk) 22:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * No, I don't think you understand. It doesn't matter how much you think the subject should be covered. It is on you to prove notability. Beyond general notability, we also have a bunch of subject-specific guidelines for different topics. We don't have one for parades, so you need to make a case based on a lot of independent, reliable sources. You can't just use Pravda for Soviet parades because they're not independent. If you can't find the sourcing, you shouldn't write the article. Write a draft article and develop it over time. I am serious about my complaint. If you keep creating articles about non-notable stuff, I'm not only going to have it all deleted, but I'm also going to drag you to a drama board so you can answer for your conduct. It's not fair to other editors to have to clean up your messes. If you stick to subjects where you can prove notability and you provide the sourcing, then it'll be completely fine. Please, stop and think before you continue this nonsense. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alternative for Germany
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alternative for Germany. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Cryptic message you left
You left a cryptic warning on my user page: "You would do well not to tilt at windmills." What are you warning me to not get involved with? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 15:37, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

User talk fixed
User talk:Daniele Compatangelo is back where it should be. I thought I should let you know since it involved another user's user talk. Hope all is well with you. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

This Month in Education: September 2017
 This Month in Education  Volume 6 | Issue 8 | September 2017

 This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

 In This Issue

Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 02:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer
Thanks for offering to help my class. This semester, I only have 14 students working on Wikipedia articles. If we run into problems, I'll reach out to you. Robertekraut (talk) 15:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Boing! said Zebedee • Ansh666 • Ad Orientem
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Tonywalton • AmiDaniel • Silence • BanyanTree • Magioladitis • Vanamonde93 • Mr.Z-man • Jdavidb • Jakec • Ram-Man • Yelyos • Kurt Shaped Box

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a successful proposal to create it, a new user right called "edit filter helper" is now assignable and revocable by administrators. The right allows non-administrators to view the details of private edit filters, but not to edit them.
 * Following a discussion about mass-application of ECP and how the need for logging and other details of an evolving consensus may have been missed by some administrators, a rough guide to extended confirmed protection has been written. This information page describes how the extended-confirmed aspects of the protection policy are currently being applied by administrators.

Technical news
 * You can now search for IP ranges at Special:Contributions. Some log pages and Special:DeletedContributions are not yet supported. Wildcards (e.g. 192.168.0.*) are also not supported, but the popular contribsrange gadget will continue to work.

Arbitration
 * Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
 * A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Old Norse religion
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Old Norse religion. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on Cage (enclosure), potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. ''WP:Boomerang Re Talk:Cage (enclosure). Two of us agree that you have attempted to intimidate other editors just because they disagree with you. I gave you an option to either strike or provide evidence but you did neither. Your behaviour there fits WP:DISRUPTSIGNS. Just ask if you wish me to provide diffs and take this further.'' Widefox ; talk 07:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * "I gave you an option to either strike or provide evidence but you did neither." What exactly do you think that I need to provide evidence for? Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 07:59, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, my accusation against you (IDHT behavior) is based upon the discussion at Talk:Cage (enclosure). I made a deletion rationale here, explaining that while cages exist and people write about different types of cages, the extant article is a dictionary definition plus a disambig page. No one is writing about cages as an entity. Despite that, you point to an AfD from five years ago. I specify my WP:REALPROBLEM concerns and clarifying "This is one of those cases where I'm right and everyone else is wrong." : "What's the actual problem?... See Don't demolish the house while it's still being built. It can be tough knowing the truth, when we go by WP:CONSENSUS. The 36 other language articles are also wrong?" Your response acts with total ignorance to everything I just said, hence my accusation. I stand by my point. I don't think you have any awareness if what I'm communicating; it seems to be a re-occurring problem as of late. If you want to preserve Cage (enclosure) be advised that you're not making Wikipedia a better place. You're just storing assemblages of words that mean nothing. If you think you can do something about my so-called incivility, take it to a drama board. I agree with Jacobim Mugatu: I feel like I am taking crazy pills. I'm not going to engage with you further on this topic so if you don't want to hear from me anymore, I can assure you, you won't. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 08:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm sure you know what happens if you persist in putting so much weight on your opinion, against the overwhelming consensus? That goes for the separate issues of editorial, and behaviour:


 * Edits: You should reread WP:LISTEN Do not confuse "hearing" with "agreeing with": The community's rejection of your idea is not proof that they have failed to hear you. Stop writing, listen, and consider what the other editors are telling you. It's not even close, nobody agrees with you at the RM, and similar at the AfD with all but a (seemingly abandoned !vote). They're both SNOW. It's WP:DEADHORSE. I say this only because:
 * Behaviour: Both User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) and I agree, so to quote him "They both sound threatening, please stop intimidating as a tactic when people disagree with you" . If you accuse others of disruption  but when asked  provide no evidence (normally diffs) then this is WP:DISRUPTSIGNS 1. 4. 5. 6. I've thought you do a good job here, so it pains me to hold you to account on this one. Regards  Widefox ; talk 13:36, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * In the immortal words of Barack Obama: "let me be clear." Don't feel any pain in regards to holding me to account. I'm just an editor like everyone else and not beyond reproach. If you think I've done wrong you're welcome to say so. While you enjoy your consensus, please consider what I've written and ask yourself if I'm really a crank. If the answer is yes, then there's no point in talking to me about it. I'm not pursuing this matter. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 13:47, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Your evidence for a claim of WP:DISRUPTION (WP:IDHT) is "Total ignorance" of your argument? (dwell for a second)
 * It's best if we leave that baseless accusation verbatim for all to see that you neither wish to provide evidence or strike. The rest is offtopic. If I see you attempting to intimidate another editor, L4, then ANI is, I believe, the correct procedure. Widefox ; talk 22:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If you're not going to bite, don't growl. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 21:37, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Reflect on what you wrote there given the context of this being about you not providing any evidence. You should be made aware that there is a clear consensus of more than two editors now that wish to pursue this if you don't desist. Widefox ; talk 10:00, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * It seems you desire to find a point of leverage here. What is it you think I need to desist doing? You visit my talk page a lot for someone that wants me to stop interacting. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 10:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not important on your page, messengers aren't, it's the message which has been voiced by more than two of us. The boomerang is WP:IDHT. Widefox ; talk 10:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

On "Damnatio memoriae"
Dear Chris,

I am retired and living in Thailand. I have thought about getting 'listed' but never bothered. What usually happens is that I follow a link from a WIKI page to another WIKI page, and find that there is nothing on that second page referencing the first.

I have always found that referencing another WIKI page is sufficient.

As for referencing "Domitian", if you go to the WIKI page on the emperor, you will find that in the third paragraph from the top the following sentence:

"After his death, Domitian's memory was condemned to oblivion by the Roman Senate, ..."

The section "condemned to oblivion" is a link, and if you hover your cursor over it on the Domitian WIKI page, it links to the WIKI page: "Damnatio memoriae". That is how I got to this page in the first place! I suspect that the reason why the original poster did not use the term "damnatio memoriae" is that as the page suggests, it was not an official term in use by the Romans. Nevertheless, it is clear that Emperor Domitian, despite winning the Dacian War and reforming the currency was denounced after his assassination by the Roman Senate and subjected to this procedure. It is within the WIKI article on Domitian that it mentions his reforms, his success in wars, and his "tyranny" according to the Roman Senate. In short, my 'reference' is to information on another WIKI page.

As for the third century emperor, that was already there, I had nothing to do with that, I just re-framed the sentence. Never heard of the guy myself, and I assumed that if he was in there he deserved to be there.

Maybe pulling all of these references out is the best course. Up to you editors.

I don't know, maybe I'll get registered, but I only do the odd thing here and there, and never felt the need before now.

James French 96.30.101.93 (talk) 12:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * James, your decision to register an account is up to you. I recommend it but it's not mandatory, of course. The issue here is that you didn't provide citations with the content you added. Per WP:CIRCULAR, you can't use one Wikipedia article to reference another; you need to add the citation presumably extant at the original page and you didn't do that. The reason why this is an issue is that per WP:V, we need to improve the encyclopedia not only by adding content but by ensuring what content we do have is correct. We have too many editors either making deliberate hoaxes or adding concepts they believe to be true for which they have no proof. Each of those types of edits look identical to what you've done, which is why I reverted you. I'm glad you want to contribute but I insist you go the last mile and provide the reliable source that supports what you want to say. If we don't enforce this requirement, before you know it all of Wikipedia says all kinds of stuff, most of which isn't true. The readers really expect that we fact-check what it says here. Thanks. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 12:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Algerian War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Algerian War. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

My edit on Arthurian history deleted
Greetings. You made a suggestion on my page, about editing. And I asked if you thought my edit on 'Brut y Brenhinedd' about Dr Cooper was reasonable. I think you did. However, my edit was deleted without comment or reason. Is this how Wiki normally works? The Brut y Brenhinedd page currently states that '(all) modern scholarship thinks that Brut y Brenhinedd was derived from Geoffrey of Monmouth'. That is clearly not the case, because Dr Cooper (a translator of this manuscript) thinks they were both derived from a common source. I added one line to make that clear, and it has now gone, without explanation. Mythosmann (talk) 15:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC) Mythosmann (talk) 15:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Your edit there had been reverted by with the edit summary: "Undue: FRINGE". What Cagwinn is referring to is WP:FRINGE. Please read that. Thanks for starting the discussion on the talk page; you can read from the comments there what the issue is.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. On the iPad there is no way of seeing the edit history (I think), so I did not see that.
 * Regards Prof Cooper, I see he he may be 'fringe' in terms of religion, but not in terms of Celtic history. When I read his translation of the manuscript it appeard the best I had seen, with very good annotations.  I had no idea he was a Creationist.  I really think the two should not be linked.  Regards the validity of the original manuscripts, there are very few historians who venture an opinion, so to say Cooper is numerically 'fringe' out of only three or four who make comment, is stretching things. Thanks again for the assistance.  Mythosmann (talk) 17:53, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Purple Heart
So I don't know a whole lot about Wikipedia, but you keep taking down my edits telling me I'm doing it wrong, so help me understand. First you say the list can only include people who have their own Wikipedia article. Can you point me to where that rule is stated, because I can't find it? You also the first time told me the newspaper article I cited was not sufficiently authoritative enough. Well this last time, I provided as citation the comments of a Congessional Representative on the floor of the United States House of Representatives as the citation. How much more authoritative do I need to get? I can't figure out any other way to respond to your comments, so if this isn't the right way, please educate me on that too. JBedsole (talk) 20:10, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:LISTPEOPLE is what you're looking for. &#8209; Iridescent 20:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reaching out to me. I had posted before: "Please write an article about a subject before listing them. Also, the sourcing for this claim of 10 purple hearts seems pretty thin. Only a handful of people in Georgia seem convinced of this, which is why I'm doubting it's true at all." The blue text (which links to WP:WTAF) is the guidance on individuals being notable and discussed in an article before listing them. (Iridescent, an administrator, has also pointed to WP:LISTPEOPLE for similar guidance.) Please click on the blue links when you see them. You had originally posted this from the Athens Banner-Herald and later a link from Facebook (which isn't allowed) which was converted into . The issue here is that 10 Purple Hearts, if true, is the highest number anyone has ever received. Why then, don't we have a bunch of other outlets and government sources discussing this? Yes, Jody Hice said all that stuff on the House floor, but he could say whatever he wanted. There's no editorial control or fact-checking. He's carrying water for the voters back home. Normally, either of the sources would probably be accepted if not for the claim of 10 Purple Hearts, which is extraordinary. I have problems with the story, too, because Curry Haynes claimed he got the first one in December 1967 and then in May 1968 in a single battle got the other nine. I'm not sure the Purple Heart is awarded that way and when someone claims they have 10 Purple Hearts and the Army doesn't vouch for it, it sounds a lot like stolen valor. Claiming a Purple Heart with intent to get a tangible benefit is a violation of Stolen Valor Act of 2013. Haynes is already dead so that doesn't matter, but Wikipedia relies on verifiability. To resolve this issue, I reached out to Don Shipley and we'll see what he says. The government keeps records on awards. If the records don't exist, journalist Wayne Ford is a sucker for publishing a story without checking the facts (which happens sometimes) and Hice is just another ill-informed politician. If Haynes's story proves true, I'll do the research to fix this for you. I hope this helps. I can imagine your frustration with this process. Wikipedia is its own animal. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:47, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Please do let me know if you find this is not true. I will be shocked, because I personally knew Mr. Haynes, knew of his character, and have seen the awards. I too, served in the military myself and am the son of career Air Force retiree. I am quite sensitive to those who claim awards they did not receive and would want anyone claiming falsely to have received awards to which they are not entitled to be called out for that. I really would like to know if you find it is not true. JBedsole (talk) 21:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Just as an FYI - I now have a photo that I took of a letter from the National Personnel Records Center Military Records Division in St. Louis confirming an amendment to Mr. Haynes DD214 to reflect award of Purple Heart with 9 Oak Leaf Clusters. This letter was provided to me by Mr. Haynes widow. Let me know how and I can provide you with a copy of that letter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JBedsole (talk • contribs) 18:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but that's not permitted. Wikipedia understandably can't run on original research. We require published, verifiable, and reliable sources because encyclopedias are tertiary sources and have to rely on what secondary sources have said. We often get enthusiasts who want to contribute what they know because Wikipedia is so open and easy, but the sort of stuff you want to do should find outlet in a magazine about military history where the editorial board can have a go at what you're trying to prove. Again, my belief is that this whole story of ten purple hearts is an outright lie. Per WP:EXTRAORDINARY, Haynes's claim to have been awarded the most Purple Hearts in US history requires some solid sourcing. Phonies regularly forge DD 214s and material they claim was burned in the 1973 NPRC fire. To keep Wikipedia even somewhat trustworthy, we need to stick to verifiable facts. If you have further questions, please ask at the talk page for our Military History WikiProject. I don't want to be contacted about this anymore. (I never did, honestly.) If I hear from you again, I'll raise the issue and see about having the entry removed. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 21:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Referring to Army Regulation 600-8-22, No more than one award will be made for more than one wound or injury received at the same instant or from the same missile, force, explosion, or agent. Which I read to mean e.g. multiple rifle shots could result in eligibility for multiple PH (maybe with the caveat that they were delivered by multiple "agents", but that probably refers to chemical attack). In other words, nine in one battle is a possibility. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

You stalker!
Thanks for showing me the page on neologisms, I have some fixing to do... I tried to add a box on your page, but I'm a new user, so I can't. To add it, just go to Talk page stalker. If you don't want the box, you don't have to add it, but I think you should. thanks anyways! WarriorFISH (talk) 00:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Adding anything to my user page would both be unwelcome and unnecessary. I already have WP:TPS/userbox on my user page, under the collapsed "Some other Wikipedia userboxes" section. I stalk many user talk pages. Happy editing. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:59, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Oh, sorry, I didn't realize. I made you this though! WarriorFISH (talk) 02:29, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

CV script recommendation
Your comment kind of got lost in the muck of my talk page because of the few days I took off. I just wanted to say thank you for the script recommendation. I'll try to use it more often in the early stages. But as you noted, I try to do triage on improperly submitted submissions or day old ones, so sometimes it's just easier to decline and worry about that before it gets published. But as always I appreciate any and all recommendations. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bukhara
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bukhara. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Request on 20:26:04, 15 October 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Joe byrne

 * Hi Chris. Thanks for reviewing the article for creation request on Antonio Onofri. I've been researching San Marino for a separate project and was surprised he didn't have an article. I agree that their system of electing four heads of state a year is a bit wacky, but this 7-time captain is one of the few names that crops up in pretty much every article or book I've come across on the history. I think the key events he's involved in and the consistent retelling of them across multiple sources are grounds for his notability, as opposed to the hundreds of others who've held the office. I hope the additional sources help to make this point. Let me know if you think it's still in need of further work. Joe byrne (talk) 20:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Joe byrne (talk) 20:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Failing pings
At Articles_for_deletion/List_of_female_military_historians, you mentioned that my WP:PINGs were failing to notify you. I changed the setting in my preferences, as you suggested. However, my subsequent ping apparently also failed to notify you, and it did not produce any kind of delivery failure message for me that I have been able to find. Are you able to receive pings from editors besides me? If so, then perhaps we are being affected by a MediaWiki bug of some kind; if not, then perhaps there is something amiss with your notification settings? Please WP:PING me if you reply, as I am not watching your talk page. Thanks! Zazpot (talk) 12:59, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, I've started noticing pings at me from other editors not working, either. I'll consider if this is something for Phabricator. This wasn't an issue last week but it definitely has been these past couple days. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:00, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * thanks for keeping an eye on it; I agree that filing a bug might be worthwhile. I'll leave that ball in your court, if that's OK. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help, but I should mention that I'm thinking of taking a WP:WIKIBREAK shortly, as I've been contributing quite a lot, recently, and need to devote time to other things :) In case it's useful to know: other users seem to have been getting my pings (i.e. my impression is that when I ping people, I get more prompt replies than otherwise), but I haven't actually confirmed this, it's just my subjective impression. Zazpot (talk) 18:59, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Turns out this was a site-wide problem for some users. I believe it's fixed now thanks to . Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 23:45, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * It's not fixed yet, I have a patch that will fix it but it probably won't roll out until Monday. In the meantime, you can work around the issue by making a change to your preferences (any change will do; for example, change your language to Canadian English, save, then change it back again and save). --Roan Kattouw (WMF) (talk) 23:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * thanks :) Is that change to preferences to be made by the sender or the (intended) recipient of the failing pings? Zazpot (talk) 00:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The recipient, unfortunately. The fix for this should roll out in the next half hour or so, then pings should start working again even for those who didn't change their preferences. --Roan Kattouw (WMF) (talk) 18:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

duplicate SPI
User:Hitmonlee is my Homie is already at SPI Meters (talk) 03:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I just moved your request into my request as a comment. Meters (talk) 03:43, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. Since I reverted him, I assumed without looking that he hadn't been reported yet. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 03:44, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Whisperback
19:08, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Oradour-sur-Glane massacre
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oradour-sur-Glane massacre. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 24
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 24, August-September 2017

 Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta! Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * User Group update
 * Global branches update
 * Star Coordinator Award - last quarter's star coordinator: User:Csisc
 * Wikimania Birds of a Feather session roundup
 * Spotlight: Wiki Loves Archives
 * Bytes in brief

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.
 * Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.
 * The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Hi Chris
Thanks for the heads up please can you let Davey2010 that I do not want him to edit my talk page either and I am thinking f reporting him for vandalism Cheers Kev inr (talk) 23:00, 22 October 2017 (UTC)kev_inrKev inr (talk) 23:00, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your response on my talk page
Buddy, the two edits I made on the Joshua Wheeler page are common knowledge by anyone with even the most rudimentary knowledge of the subject matter. I do my research and have been successfully editing these types of pages (both in two usernames and anonymously) for some time now. If you do yours, you will see that what I posted was 100% factual, and it was unnecessary for you to remove it. Have a nice day. Or3312 (talk) 02:54, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not your buddy. Learn to cite your sources. Wikipedia does not take the word of dilettantes. Chris Troutman talk:Chris troutman| talk ) 03:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Go to my contributions page and you will see that I have been trying to keep these pages sticking to the facts/not citing poorly sourced articles (otherwise I wouldn't even bother with edits). Where have you been when I have been trying to remove the BS I find in these (and other articles)? Again, I can put a citation (or a dozen) behind my very minor edit, but it is such common knowledge that I hardly see the need to. Last time I checked, the sky is blue, grass is green, and Wheeler's unit is under operational control of JSOC.

BTW, apologies for being uncharitable. I should have just given you the benefit of the doubt in the beginning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Or3312 (talk • contribs) 13:16, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Magnus Penker Draft
Strongline123 (talk) 07:04, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Chris Sherwin
Hi, Chris - re:your N tag on Sherwin's bio - he easily passes WP:PROF
 * Examples: Springer- Author mentions him in the Preface pg xii, and he authored Chap 7 - Farm Animals (C. Sherwin) Video Techniques in Animal Ecology and Behavior, Author = S.D. Wratten, Publisher = Springer - Science and Business Media, ISBN-13: 978-0412466403, Year = Dec 6, 2012 - and there are several published works like it that are cited.
 * Universities Federation For Animal Welfare - 1st recipient of the UFAW Hume Research Fellowship (see #3 WP:PROF)
 * He has made a substantial impact in his field as evidenced by several chapters in science journals and also as a co-author. I'm going to remove the tag unless you have further objections. Atsme 📞📧 14:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, indeed, I further object. I've been waiting all morning. I really wish you'd've given this matter thought before you made the article. First, it matters not that one contributor mentions what another contributor wrote in a chapter of the same publication. I'd expect if I co-authored a book with one of my professors, they might mention me and the other contributors in the preface, too. The fact that it's not independent really undercuts any claim of notability because WP:NACADEMIC #1 requires the claims are "demonstrated by independent reliable sources". Sherwin published stuff. Many academics do. Secondly, good luck convincing anyone the UFAW Hume Research Fellowship is "a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level" as criterion #2 requires. Not only is the award itself not notable, the article about Universities Federation for Animal Welfare barely mentions it. This portrays the award as funding for post-docs. It's not a lifetime achievement award. Hell, I've got my name submitted right now for a couple fellowships, too. If I win does that make me notable? UFAW isn't on the level of Guggenheim Fellowship. By the way, getting a fellowship for money like Guggenheim is not the same as #3's "highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association" like fellowship in the Royal Society. You seem to have the two confused. Edits evince that you've got nothing. That's not even the right "Hume." The award is named for Major Charles W. Hume, the founder of UFAW. I guess he's not notable, either. Sherwin doesn't qualify as notable on any of the PROF criteria and he doesn't pass ANYBIO or GNG, either. I wrote a bunch of articles about academics so I'm pretty familiar with what qualifies and what doesn't. I think what would be best is if you pull that article into userspace or draftspace until future journalism will provide the necessary sourcing for notability.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 15:11, 21 October 2017 (UTC)


 * I fixed the wikilink to UFAW - my apologies on that one. I don't know exactly why you are focused on this one biography, but I totally disagree with you regarding notability. To begin, WP:ACADEMIC clearly states, Some academics may not meet any of these criteria, but may still be notable for their academic work. It is important to note that it is very difficult to make clear requirements in terms of numbers of publications or their quality: the criteria, in practice, vary greatly by field. Also, this proposal sets the bar fairly low, which is natural: to a degree, academics live in the public arena, trying to influence others with their ideas. It is natural that successful ones should be considered notable. There is little doubt that his work meets the notability criteria in his academic field, so unless your academic work is in the same field, why are you comparing what he's done for the good of laboratory animal welfare to your own academic work? See you at AfD. Atsme 📞📧 19:46, 21 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Its amazing how much time editors who claim to be "experts" on things like "notability" spend talking about article subjects they claim are "not notable". Even more amazing is the fact that they find references online to PROVE their "non-notability" in order to PROVE their "expertise". Interesting logic at work. And none of them ever seem to seek a consensus before they declare a subject "not notable" arbitrarily and unilaterally. Nor do they have any problem wasting more "bandwidth" and/or "memory" on their arguments or rather "explanations" for the NON-notability of those subjects than a short article about the subject itself would require. They also don't seem to have any problem conducting their OWN RESEARCH as they check online both cited sources in the article they seek to delete and other internet resources. How is a DELETION or REVERSION EDIT using OWN RESEARCH not a violation of WP:OWN? Because its THEIR OWN RESEARCH. Just like THEIR "multiple accounts" are just fine and dandy and even a GOOD THING even though they're using them to AVOID or PREVENT being BLOCKED or DE-SYSOPPED with their shenanigans that invariably consist mainly of REVERTING and DELETING and otherwise DESTROYING content rather than creating anything. And they can always FIND a "consensus" for their own violations of "policy" being perfectly acceptable. All they have to do is push the invisible panic button and "other editors" come swooping in to save them. Or something like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.234.100.169 (talk • contribs) 12:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Chris - per WP:AfD it states: If the reasons given in the deletion nomination are later addressed by editing, the nomination should be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an admin. If the nominator fails to do it when you think it should have been done (people can be busy, so assume good faith on this point), leave a note on the nominator's talk page to draw their attention. That's what I just did. The bio is up at DYK, and after that will nominated for GA so your attention to this matter will be greatly appreciated. <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em; color:#A2006D;">Atsme 📞📧 20:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Per WP:WDAFD, withdrawing can only happen if no one else supports deletion; there are delete !votes present. You can wait until the discussion is closed normally. Further, neither the changes made nor the keep !votes have refuted my nomination. The sources cited are either not independent of the subject or they are mere mentions. The subject still isn't notable per GNG (as well as PROF and ANYBIO). Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, your edit summary (→‎Chris Sherwin: not withdrawing because I actually know the rules on this), is contradicted by your decision to PROD that biography knowing full well I would oppose it. The policy is very clear: PROD must only be used if no opposition to the deletion is expected. Good day. <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em; color:#A2006D;">Atsme 📞📧 01:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2017
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Request on 01:11:04, 29 October 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Niclas.hedhman
I think Wikipedia is falling apart. Any new articles have too high barrier for entry, especially compared to a big chunk of existing articles. Denying articles on Open Source projects, no matter if too much information or too little information, sourced or not, is a shame on Wikipedia's heritage. Wikipedia itself WOUDL NOT EXIST if it wasn't for the availability of Apache Software Foundation and its many, many "cousins" of the Free and Open source software world.

Take this to the Wikipedia OVERLORDS that seems set to have more interest in CONTROL than freedoms. Go tell them that Wikipedia needs to move away from FOSS and start running everything on Oracle, IBM and Microsoft solutions and not freeloading on FOSS. In return, we will remove all FOSS articles, existing and future ones.

Terms of Use contradiction; It says that "Text to which you hold the copyright", yet I have had edits been removed because my own material was deemed to exist elsewhere (with a more permissive and compatible license than required) and not tertiary sourced. Which one is it? Do you want the accurate information from the horse's mouth ("you hold the copyright") or you want misrepresentation from elsewhere? Why is some organizations allowed to directly edit, referencing themselves, when others are not? It is inconsistent and disgusting!

Niclas.hedhman (talk) 01:11, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Had you considered reading the guidance you were given? Yes, we want "misrepresentation from elsewhere" if by "elsewhere" you mean reputable sources like newspapers, books, and magazines. "Why is some organizations allowed to directly edit, referencing themselves" We require partisans like you to divulge your conflict of interest. We send businesses home disappointed, everyday. We don't assume notability from a company's own website, although we might allow it for some issues of verifiability. "Take this to the Wikipedia OVERLORDS that seems set to have more interest in CONTROL than freedoms." I realize you're asking this because you're too ignorant to do this yourself. Rest assured, the Wikipedia overlords don't listen to me. "I think Wikipedia is falling apart." It took you this long to figure that out? Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 01:53, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

File:General Haig star.png
Thanks for recognizing my initiation of this award. It seems, however, to have grown away from its origins.

When Reagan was shot, Haig, notoriously, said "As of now, I am in control here...", cheerfully breezing past HW. That might even have been a good thing... had it not been Haig. &mdash; Xiong &#29066; talk * 08:50, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000; background-color:#FFB924; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Happy Halloween!

Hello Chris troutman: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!   –  Adityavagarwal (talk) 16:03, 30 October 2017 (UTC) Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Best avoided
I believe the only reasonable response to your comment (copied here) is "focus on content, not contributor." @Montanabw: I cannot understand the apparent urgency a few fans of horses feel for ending this AfD absolutely as soon as possible. I think both you and Atsme have taken this personally, which is both unfortunate and inappropriate. Comments from Atsme like this and this (among others) seem to reveal some sort of persecution complex tending toward BATTLEFIELD-view problems. Clearly this AfD has brought out the worst in her. I think the both of you would do well to seek counseling and reexamine your choices. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) Chris Troutman (talk) 1:51 pm, 27 October 2017, last Friday (3 days ago) (UTC−6) While anyone can make a case for AfD, once the consensus goes the other way, it's time to drop the stick and not cast aspersions on other editors. Your above comment was completely out of line. I would suggest you strike your comment at the AfD. I will not request an apology as I do not require ceremonial apologetics to move on. Montanabw (talk) 18:44, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I decline your suggestion, beyond the fact that the AfD is already closed. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:09, 30 October 2017 (UTC)


 * For future actions, perhaps you might choose to rethink edit summaries such as this as well as the content of the edit. Your comments and edit summary were both inappropriate and out of line.  Montanabw (talk) 19:16, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * No, I stand behind my comments. You can have your opinion about my disapproval. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:54, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Likewise. Consider this a reminder of WP:NPA/ and WP:AGF then.  Montanabw (talk) 20:49, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

11:34:40, 31 October 2017 review of submission by Sabeyer
Hi Chris,

Thank you very much your review. I see that you rejected my article as you believe that Ditsios Stavros is not an artist of public interest. There are several Greek magazine articles on him (http://www.stavrosditsios.com/interviews/) as well as he was recently on Greek TV (see https://vimeo.com/240223670 intime 21:00). Do I need to place this information in the article to get not rejected?

Best regards

Sascha-A. Beyer
 * Yes, please provide citations in the draft. Rather than point to the subject's webpage where they've listed interviews, cite the interviews themselves. Be advised, interviews aren't independent of the subject so they don't provide notability. We need either journalistic or academic articles about the subject that are totally unaffiliated with him to make a claim of general notability. Our criteria for artists would presume the subject notable if his work "has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums." If Ditsios's work is part of a museums' permanent collections then you could make a case on that. Please recognize that notability is judged upon Wikipedia's crtieria, not what you might believe makes the subject notable, like appearing on TV.
 * While we're on the subject: if you have a connection to the artist involved, you need to declare your conflict of interest. The draft does read a bit promotionally. There's no reason to include nonsense about his early career or his family if you don't have citations to support the content. Wikipedia is not a place to advertise. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 12:13, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Review of submission by ZeroXero Draft:NACRA
Thank you for reviewing my article NACRA, which I had submitted for the third time. You rejected it with the same note as the previous reviewer, about sources, which I find odd because I added 10 new references between the submissions.

The rejection makes this primary claim: "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability."

There are two, and only two, companies that have been the primary builders of beach cats, worldwide, since about 1968. Hobie and Nacra. Hobie's first successful design was a few years before NACRA's first design, but both have built dozens of boats in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s. NACRA has dominated Hobie for the last 20 years, as evidenced by several metrics: Designs accepted by the International Olympic authority for the sport: World Sailing,  entries in open regattas, visibility in the trade press, and selection as boats for the Olympics.

Essentially the position you have adopted, I am sure inadvertently due to lack of expertise in the subject matter, is that an article about Ford Trucks is "notable" (that is the Hobie article, which has been up for years) but for some reason the article about Chevy Trucks is not (despite having a more references, and more significant, independent and noteworthy references.)


 * Comparison:                 Hobie Article             NACRA Draft Article
 * Total # of Refs                      14                              16
 * # of Ref Sources                      8                              14
 * SOURCE BREAKDOWN
 * company web site                      1                               1
 * Sailing.Org (Olympic Body)            6                               1      (for Hobie these are all just "Class Association Reports")
 * US Sailing Org                        1                               0
 * Australia Sailing Org.                0                               1
 * British Sailing Org.                  0                               1
 * Print Magazines                       0                               5      (Sail(2)(USA), Sailing (AUS), Yachts and Yachting(2)(UK)
 * Newspaper                             0                               1      (Savannah Morning News)
 * Sailing Web Sites & Web Magazines     0                               4

The three magazines are among the leading sailing publications in their respective countries, all of them of long standing.

To respond to another criticism: these are all articles about either NACRAs as a group or specific NACRA model. For instance, the Newspaper article is titled ""Model of catamaran used in Worrell 1000 under fire", the model was the NACRA 6.0. So, it was not merely mentioned. Not anecdotal.  NACRA is in the title of all other articles.

In contrast, the Hobie references are pretty weak. I'm sure I could do a better job of finding better Hobie references, and in fact I will probably put that on my "to do" list for Wikipedia. But as it stands the References for the Hobie Article are clearly fewer in number, mostly just lists of results from races, and completely lacking any actual editorial coverage of the brand or their boats.

NOTABILITY: USE IN THE OLYMPICS

Moving on to NOTABILITY: Another simple criteria is "Has the manufacturers boats achieved selection as an Olympic boat". Very few of the tens of thousands of boat designs have ever been selected for use in the Olympics. Only two catamarans have ever been selected for use in the Olympics: the Tornado and the NACRA 17. The Tornado was used from 1976 to 2008, teh NACRA has replaced it in 2012 and 2016. No Hobie Cat has ever been selected as an Olympic boat. Both the Tornado and NACRA 17 have their own pages. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tornado_(sailboat), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nacra_17.

In addition the NACRA 15 has been selected (by World Sailing) for the Youth Sailing World Championships. And, again there is a page on this boat already in Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nacra_15/. It was also selected by the RYA (Royal Yachting Association, the controlling authority for sail racing in the UK.

The Article on Notability says: "If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from independent sources, then it is not notable simply because other individual organizations of its type are commonly notable or merely because it exists"  What I am showing here is that it is Notable because NACRA (the Brand, which actually involves multiple companies) has been SELECTED THROUGH COMPETITIVE TRIALS by the INDEPENDENT SOURCES of World Sailing and The Royal Yachting Association and others. (This information is all contained in the references, BTW.)

In addition the articles in leading print magazines, is another example of INDEPENDENT SOURCES finding NACRA "NOTABLE". Clearly "Sail" "Sailing" and "Yachts and Yachting" magazines are "RELIABLE SOURCES" on the topic of sail boats and brands.

The DEPTH OF COVERAGE criteria, again seems to be met by my references. (It is probably not met, in my opinion by the Hobie Article, which has six references which are essentially archived club reports. I could certainly add six, or more, of those for NACRA class associations, but did not because they don't meet the DEPTH OF COVERAGE criteria.

ARE BOAT BRANDS NOTABLE AT ALL? While Hobie Cat is the closest analog, I decided to check and see if other boat BRANDS had pages, starting with some of my favorites. Here is what i found, and some notes on their references. X-Yachts YES  References: 26 (Breakdown: 6 Magazine article from several of the same mags, several from sail web sites, 5 from manufacturer) X-Yachts are not an Olympic class, nor a Sailing.org offshore class. They have built far fewer boats than NACRA.

Catalina Yachts YES. References: 5 (2 magazines, 1 book)  Very popular brand, built in large numbers similar to NACRA.

"Pearson Yachts" YES. References: 5 (2 magazines, 1 book, none retrievable) A defunct boat company, built boats from 1956 to 1990.

Corsair Marine YES. References: 2 (3 magazine, 1 personal web site) In production of various models since 1984.

Laser Performance YES. References 12 (1 article, 1 book) Claims to be the largest manufacturer of small boats (possibly true, no reference). Does Produce a Olympic Class boat, the Laser. I would say this company is clearly notable, like Hobie and NACRA - due to ubiquity, world-wide use of their boats, longevity of the brand and designs.

Hinckley Yachts YES. References (4 articles from 2 magazines).

SUMMARY:

I feel that in making significant changes to this article between the second and third submissions I overcame the NOTABILITY criticism. I did not get any helpful feedback, on my sincere effort to craft an article that meets the standard.

My article is clearly better referenced than all but one of the other Sailboat Brand Articles I surveyed. (I did not cherry pick, every one I thought of is listed above.)

I realize that comparison, alone, doesn't make something notable. But, from my position as a subject matter expert I would rate Laser, Hobie and NACRA as clearly notable, built on multiple continents, sailed all over the world, in the case of Laser and NACRA boats that have been used in Olympic Sailing events, a notable achievment that only 30 or so manufacturers have ever achieved.

Maybe all these other, poorly referenced articles should be deleted, but I don't think so. I think mine should be accepted.

DISCLAIMERS:

I am not a current or former employee of NACRA or any related business. I have never worked in the Sailboat industry. I do not own a NACRA, but I have sailed and raced them. I consider myself a medium level SME on boats, particularly Multihulls, and have read a huge amount on the topic for more than 30 years. Multihulls have had a hard time gaining respect in the sailing world, for many years, and it still hurts to see one of the greatest, most accomplished, most noted, and most successful racing brands DENIED SPACE IN WIKIPEDIA, while boats whose only notable feature is that RICH GUYS BUY THEM like X-Yachts (perhaps 500 total ever built), of course, has it's space here. It seems "classist".

I would like HELP, mostly HELP ME UNDERSTAND WHY THE STANDARD SEEMS SO OUT OF WACK FOR THIS ARTICLE COMPARED TO ALL OTHERS IN THE CATEGORY.

How many *MORE* articles & references would make this brand Notable?

HELP! PLEASE!

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeroXero (talk • contribs) 00:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * A recommendation up front: leaving a huge amount of text generally pushes editors away. I'm a volunteer. I get no pay for trying to build an encyclopedia and I get hassle from people like you not to mention my fellow Wikipedians. I'm quitting reviewing drafts today in large part because of people like you. You're welcome.
 * In response to your rant: first, understand that pointing to other articles is an invalid argument. I totally understand your position because this approach is very common. You're trying to divine some sort of order from what current articles look like versus your draft. The problem here is that Wikipedia stupidly allows everyone, even you, to edit. More adept editors than you were able to create articles on these other boats. That doesn't mean that we, as Wikipedians, think those articles are ok or their subjects are notable. Hobie Cat, for example, has been tagged for the past nine months as being problematic. It could probably be deleted. The problem is that there are entirely too many people editing and we can't keep up. If we accepted your draft because it's about as lousy as Hobie Cat, we'd have a race to the bottom resulting in the overall quality of the project dropping. For that reason, I'm not going to address any points you made along that line. Believe me, nobody here cares enough about boats to conspire against some companies for the benefit of other companies. Many businesses hire editors to write for them and push stuff through the system but often you don't get what you paid for, we have many diligent editors on the lookout for promotional pieces, and we block editors that run afoul.
 * Second, you make the charge that I unfairly judged the draft "due to lack of expertise in the subject matter". That's kinda right but you could be careful with your tone. Wikipedia is written by dilettantes, and as you might imagine, those of us that review drafts review hundreds if not thousands and usually outside of our knowledge base. Wikipedia's criteria, however, don't require an insider's appreciation of niche topics. Your draft cites a bunch of trade publications and periodicals about sailing. So far as I can see, none of those are notable. If the publications aren't notable, and possible neither independent nor reliable, then I can't really use them to establish notability. General notability requires significant coverage in various publications and your sources aren't exactly The New York Times. I know if it were an article about a musician I'd be looking for citations from Hit Parader, Revolver, or the like. This issue of which sources are used can be a problem in subjects like Mixed Martial Arts, where the media sources like mmafighting.com aren't notable because they're too niche and articles about fighters like Matt Hughes have to pass subject-specific guidelines like WP:NMMA. This brings us to our third problem, the fact that fans for sailing didn't join Wikipedia in significant numbers to get a carve-out for your niche interest. The MMA fans and the baseball fans and the people that like writing about academics showed up and got their carve-outs. Articles about boats have to pass "general notability" and companies that make boats have to pass WP:NCORP. You could be a CEO of a multi-million dollar company but you probably won't pass general notability and business-types haven't been effective in the presumption of notability. It may seem like it's not fair and that's because it's not. If you wanted to write about a character from Star Wars or a hall of fame bucking bull, I guarantee you could find help. Boats? Not so much.
 * In the past I would go down that list of sailing companies and nominate those articles for deletion to help clear up your confusion and get rid of non-notable content. As it is, I got in some trouble earlier so I'm now out of that business. The best thing for you to do is to make a request at WikiProject Sailing or the reward board. The former location has editors that know your field. The latter is a place where you can offer rewards for editors to take up this task for you.
 * In closing, I recommend you ask for help and/or find sources like mainstream newspapers and magazines. I hope that helps. Please do not recontact me about this. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 01:04, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Treblinka extermination camp
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Treblinka extermination camp. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Longhair • Megalibrarygirl • TonyBallioni • Vanamonde93
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Allen3 • Eluchil404 • Arthur Rubin • Bencherlite

Technical news
 * The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team is creating an "Interaction Timeline" tool that intends to assist administrators in resolving user conduct disputes. Feedback on the concept may be posted on the talk page.
 * A new function is now available to edit filter managers that will make it easier to look for multiple strings containing spoofed text.

Arbitration
 * Eligible editors will be invited to submit candidate statements for the 2017 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 12 until November 21. Voting will begin on November 27 and last until December 10.
 * Following a request for comment,, and  will serve as the Electoral Commission for the 2017 ArbCom Elections.

Obituaries
 * The Wikipedia community has recently learned that (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as . Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

This Month in Education: October 2017
<span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:60px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">This Month in Education <span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:20px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:900px;"> Volume 6 | Issue 9 | October 2017

<span style="font-weight:regular; text-align:center; font-size:14px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:1000px;">This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

<span style="color:white; font-size:24px; font-family:times new roman; display:block; background:#339966; width:1000px;">In This Issue

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 02:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 November newsletter: Final results
The final round of the 2017 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2017 WikiCup top three finalists:
 * First Place -
 * Second Place -
 * Third Place -

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:
 * Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a two-way tie with themselves for an astonishing five FAs in R2 and R4).
 * Good Article – Adityavagarwal had 14 GAs promoted in R5.
 * Featured List – and  both produced 2 FLs in R2
 * Featured Pictures – improved an image to FP status in R5, the only FP this year.
 * Featured Topic – has the only FT of the Cup in R3.
 * Good Topic – Four different editors created a GT in R2, R3 and R4.
 * Did You Know – Adityavagarwal had 22 DYKs on the main page in R5.
 * In The News – had 14 ITN on the main page in R2.
 * Good Article Review – completed 31 GARs in R1.

Over the course of the 2017 WikiCup the following content was added or improved on Wikipedia: 51 Featured Articles, 292 Good Articles, 18 Featured Lists, 1 Featured Picture, 1 Featured Topics, 4 Good Topics, around 400 Did You Knows, 75 In The News, and 442 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.

Regarding the prize vouchers - please send  an email from the email address to which you would like your Amazon voucher sent. Please include your preference of global Amazon marketplace as well. We hope to have the electronic gift cards processed and sent within a week.

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2018 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. ,, and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Request for edit help
Hello Chris Troutman - I'm an employee of the International Institute of Strategic Studies. We are searching for editors to review our proposed changes to the IISS page, which address the fact the page is insubstantial and contains slight inaccuracies. I see you have edited the page of another foreign policy think tank in recent months (Chatham House) - would you be interested in looking over our page? Thanks for taking the time to read my message. Craig. BurnettIISS (talk) 16:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Regrets
I am sorry that I couldn't make it to the edit-a-thon. I had an appointment downtown. If you hear of any future events like this, please let me know. More lead time will allow me to adjust my schedule. Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐   ✉  19:11, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your comments are being discussed at ANI
Please see WP:ANI (permalink). Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:39, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * In light of the comments made there, I accept admonishment. It would seem it is I that need to reconsider involvement in Wikipedia. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 12:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You do good work around here and I consider you an important voice. Yes, you were a jerk, but you're still a net positive to the project by a long stretch. I think it would be a good thing if you apologized to some of the folks you were a jerk to (like Tony), but I don't think anybody thinks that Wikipedia is better off without Chris troutman.  A  Train talk 15:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your attempt at kindness, but the fact that you think I am a jerk and that I should apologize is evidence of a serious disconnect. That you "don't think anybody thinks that Wikipedia is better off without Chris troutman" is naive. Again, it means a lot that you advocated for me in that thread but a near-unanimous 23-editor denunciation of my conduct is a problem for me. Contributing to Wikipedia only makes sense if you get something out of it and I'm finding my efforts to make Wikipedia better cause more friction than desired. Finally, my involvement fails people like you and others who want to see better of me. I'd rather pare back my involvement than make my very few supporters regret ever sticking up for me. I have editing goals on Wikipedia and those don't include getting into arguments with editors whom I hold in contempt. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 01:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * My two cents -- having known you in person, I've been surprised at some of the nasty things you've said on Wikipedia. I'm not sure why you're like this here when I never saw it from you in person (where at most there was some occasional prickliness). I can't imagine you'd treat other editors like this in real life, so perhaps you should bring your RL mindset online as well. Hoping you can take this all to heart and move forward in a constructive manner. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:42, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm really at a loss for words. I've been rolling this over in my mind for the last couple days and I'm still hurt that you of all people would show up to deliver this message. I'll assume you made your comments trying to be constructive, but I find them anything but. Please do not offer your two cents to me ever again. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:45, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Turkey
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Turkey. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Request other users to weigh in at Talk:Abortion
Hi, would you be willing to weigh-in at a discussion that I am pursuing over at talk:Abortion? Note that I have been called "Berkeley" because of my other IP address. Thanks, -208.71.156.130 (talk) 20:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * This is my other IP address. -208.76.28.70 (talk) 23:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but no. I don't mind helping out with a dead link. I absolutely will not get into a discussion on the content of the article about abortion. Some editors love wading into that battle with righteous indignation; I don't. I know next to nothing about the subject and I am generally curtailing my meta-editing (the talk pages, RfC's, and other back-office stuff) after my recent admonishment. You couldn't pay me enough to get into that mess. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:12, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Request on 18:08:47, 15 November 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Masha.p
Hello Chris,

My Wikipedia article on Digital Rocks Physics got rejected about a month ago citing notability and verifiability of references. Thanks for your email, and the time spent to review and reach out, and I apologize for a slight delay. I added more references, including a textbook. Most of the references are review articles in notable scientific journals, and in themselves have 200+ references within (all verifiable, they have DOIs pointing to the scientific journals in question). This is a research field that is 30+ years old. I would think this is enough to prove the topic is worth having a Wiki entry, and if it is not, that I am missing something fundamental and need more help. Many thanks for your time!

Masha.p (talk) 18:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but I've since quit reviewing drafts. I can see you added a good number of academic drafts and it might be a good idea to resubmit your draft. I would caution you to remove all those external links in the various sections per WP:ELNO. We allow external links in only a few cases; Wikipedia is not meant to be a link farm to other websites. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:21, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018
So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? , and. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

OUTCOMES
Please continue the conversation at OUTCOMES. JMWt (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * No. It's not worth it any longer. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 13:13, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Continent
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Continent. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Made to Stick
If it makes you feel any better, I think you are right, as policy says, "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." At the very worst case, it takes two minutes to strip down a notable but promotional topic to a one-sentence stub and leave a note saying so on the talk page. I was contemplating closing that AfD as "Speedy keep" but I think just stating my view in it will do for now. <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  12:34, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I also agree with you about this book, and actually added references to three reviews to the article. But I deeply disagree with the extreme combativeness that you are exhibiting on DGG's talk page. You are out of line there. <b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it  23:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ned Kelly
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ned Kelly. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Deletion
I'd like to ask why you deleted sections from WEMB. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberland001 (talk • contribs) 06:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I un-did edits by a CoI-editor. I also removed info that was sourced to a blog or not sourced, at all. The goal here is to stick to what we can prove, rather than what is correct right now. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 15:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

This Month in Education: November 2017
<span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:60px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">This Month in Education <span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:20px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:900px;"> Volume 6 | Issue 10 | November 2017

<span style="font-weight:regular; text-align:center; font-size:14px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:1000px;">This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

<span style="color:white; font-size:24px; font-family:times new roman; display:block; background:#339966; width:1000px;">In This Issue

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 17:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kashmir conflict
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kashmir conflict. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Dicussion about Honshu
Dear Chris, thanks for your opinion. I understand that your criteria of editing is based on 'neutral point of view'. And that is also my criteria of edition.

'Sea of Japan' is widely used internationally, but actually the naming issue of this sea is still on debate. So, many organizations recommend people to write both names (Sea of Japan and East Sea) for this sea. In most cases, they put East Sea in parenthesis, but it depends on the preference of people or organization.

For example, the geographic location of 'Ulleungdo' (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulleungdo) is written as 'East Sea (Sea of Japan)'. But I didn't edit this part because it was neutrally written. Even if it were written as ' Sea of Japan (East Sea)', I wouldn't have editted it. The addition of '(East Sea)' in the text of Honshu, was done by the same token.

'Reflecting all different views and opinions of issue which is not resolved'- This is the "neutral view" what I think. Therefore, writing a single name for 'Sea of Japan' could be read as a biased description. I will wait for your reply without editing or rolling-back.

Sincerely Johnny Hyojong Kim (talk) 08:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Hypocrisy by Wikipedia Admins
Hi Chris, hope you take this message in the right spirit. I find it very disturbing that Wikipedia has turned into a very biased source of information politically. I got you message about my changes in Zakir Naik and I appreciate you (or some other admin) reverting the change but at the same time I do not appreciate the way some of Wikipedia admins are vandalizing pages like Bajrang Dal by putting almost the same content in lead. Is their anything which can be done to prevent such kind of bias in Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gauravsaral (talk • contribs) 18:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Joe Roe
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg JzG
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ericorbit • Perceval • Thingg • Tristanb • Violetriga

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.

Technical news
 * Wikimedians are now invited to vote on the proposals in the 2017 Community Wishlist Survey on Meta Wiki until 10 December 2017. In particular, there is a section of the survey regarding new tools for administrators and for anti-harassment.
 * A new function is available to edit filter managers which can be used to store matches from regular expressions.

Arbitration
 * Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is open until Sunday 23:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC). There are 12 candidates running for 8 vacant seats.

Miscellaneous
 * Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Outreach and Invitations:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
 * Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
 * If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: . Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive
 * A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
 * Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. —  TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 
 * ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
 * The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Please comment on Talk:Istvaeonic languages
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Istvaeonic languages. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Mail
Please don't reply to it here or elsewhere in public. Activist (talk) 23:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 25
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 25, October – November 2017

<div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta! Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * OAWiki & #1Lib1Ref
 * User Group update
 * Global branches update
 * Spotlight: Research libraries and Wikimedia
 * Bytes in brief

Please comment on Template talk:Million-plus agglomerations in India
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Million-plus agglomerations in India. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-radius: 32px; border-color:#009600; background: #FFFBC4; border-width:8px; text-align:center; padding:7px; height:210px;" class="plainlinks"> Merry Christmas !!

Hi, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,

Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia! ,

– Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:26, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2017 News
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas !!!
<div style="; float: left; margin-top: 3px; background-color: #CD0412; border: 1px solid #0F6E02; padding: 10px; width: 425px; clear: both;"> <div style="; border-style:solid; border-color:#0C8703; background-color:#CD0412; border-width:5px; text-align:left; padding:18px;" class="plainlinks" valign="top" width: 300px;> CAPTAIN RAJU (T) is   wishing   you   a   Merry   Christmas  ( quite possibly a   White   Christmas . '''

<span style="color: white; margin-bottom: 0.3em; font-size: 116%; border-bottom: medium none; font-weight: bold; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% transparent; margin: 0px; overflow: hidden; padding-top: 0.5em; padding-bottom: 0.17em;">Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year ''' This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.

Spread the Christmas spirit  by adding    to someone's talk page with a friendly message. If everyone who got this put it on two talk pages, we would have... lots of Christmas spirit! Have fun finding links  in this message!

— 21:09, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:14, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Benito Mussolini
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Benito Mussolini. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

New Years new page backlog drive
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:


 * The total number of reviews completed for the month.
 * The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Chris troutman!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;height:173px;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Chris troutman, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

– Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Please comment on Talk:Cold War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cold War. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Muboshgu
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Anetode • Laser brain • Worm That Turned
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg None

Bureaucrat changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news
 * A request for comment is in progress to determine whether the administrator policy should be amended to require disclosure of paid editing activity at WP:RFA and to prohibit the use of administrative tools as part of paid editing activity, with certain exceptions.

Technical news
 * The 2017 Community Wishlist Survey results have been posted. The Community Tech team will investigate and address the top ten results.
 * The Anti-Harassment Tools team is inviting comments on new blocking tools and improvements to existing blocking tools for development in early 2018. Feedback can be left on the discussion page or by email.

Arbitration
 * Following the results of the 2017 election, the following editors have been (re)appointed to the Arbitration Committee:, , , , , , ,.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

This Month in Education: December 2017
<span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:60px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">This Month in Education <span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:20px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:900px;"> Volume 6 | Issue 11 | December 2017

<span style="font-weight:regular; text-align:center; font-size:14px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:1000px;">This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

<span style="color:white; font-size:24px; font-family:times new roman; display:block; background:#339966; width:1000px;">In This Issue

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 19:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Karl Popper
I don't understand your comment "Cited source isn't reliable, anyway" in your revert. The user is citing the primary source (Conjectures and Refutations) and his ref links an online copy of the relevant chapter of that book. While I agree that this source may not be the best once to cite, I don't see why it should be unreliable (it says "I [ie., Popper] later described such a rescuing operation as a 'conventionalist twist' or a 'conventionalist stratagem'", which, if you know Popper's works, quite cleary refers to his earler work Logic of Scientific Discovery where he uses these terms for the first time). While I agree that most of the stuff you deleted was unneeded, deleting everything seems a bit excessive. --rtc (talk) 02:54, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

A belated thank you (and happy 2018!)
Hello Chris - just posting to thank you for the Christmas wishes. I was on a wikibreak and did not initially see your message. All the best for 2018! Take care, Patient Zerotalk 13:06, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Getting information
Hi didn't you send me a message recently when I asked you if could message you if I had a complaint? If so let me know and I'll message you soon. Davidgoodheart (talk) 02:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Nope; wasn't me. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to Karl.i.biased has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Karl.i.biased (talk) 00:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ukraine, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Karl.i.biased (talk) 00:25, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Enough. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 00:27, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Israel
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Israel. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your pie chart
Looks like you're out of date. You're spending a lot more time away from creating content and a lot more time talking about Wikipedia process. Your content % has dropped from your alleged 37.71% to 29.11%, so I suggest you update your graph to let the world know what you're really doing here. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:27, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I remind you that you are "prohibited from posting speculation about the motivations of editors or reflections on their general competence" so my content work isn't your concern. I, which you can't seem to follow. As for me, I'm not a content creator like you though I wish I was. (I got a little work done on Cilver and I'm still proud of Robin Fontes. It's not much but grad school is demanding.) If is to be believed, I'm here to start fights. Much as I'd like to create content, I'm kinda busy and no one is offering me money to edit. Sandstein, unlike you, hasn't misbehaved to the point of needing to get slapped around by ARBCOM. If you disagree with his admin actions, that's fine. Take your complaint to the right venue. SlimVirgin was far more professional in her argument against Sandstein's action. Your ill-thought comments about adults and recall is just going to further sour the community on you. But you know what? Thanks for playing. I'm glad to have served as enough of a distraction to get you deranged so you stop being a pain to other editors.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:55, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Nice rant, just change the misleading chart, thanks! The Rambling Man (talk) 08:14, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Should I start collecting diffs again? Come on. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * What, diffs where we see you abusing your position as an admin? If you even read the context for this, you'd get it, but you haven't and you don't.  I'd suggest you go and change some text to purple or something equally disruptive.  Your boring threat is totally unbecoming, so do us all a favour and don't repeat the indiscretion.  P.S. good work on overlooking all the direct personal attacks above, you're doing a sterling job as admin there as ever! The Rambling Man (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * You'll note that The ed17 is the president of my fan club. He initiated the ANI thread I linked to above. (Perhaps you should have read that.) I promise you, if he thought I issued any personal attacks I'd already be blocked. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I very much doubt it. It's all open season on trying to get me kicked out of here.  You (and the admin) seriously don't consider calling another editor "deranged" (mad, insane) a personal attack?  Well you're both completely wrong.  For you Troutman, I expect it, but from this admin, it's just another diff to add to the ongoing abuse of his position.  The Rambling Man (talk) 20:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm really glad that it seems like you've taken the comments from a few months back (I'm thinking of the ones on your talk page) to heart. :-)
 * I am genuinely looking forward to the day you bring me before Arbcom with your extensive catalog of abuses, even though I know it'll never happen. That said, this is about you and your Arbcom restriction. I'd much prefer to not waste my time putting another case together, but yet here we are once again, with you skirting the boundaries of your restrictions. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I've take rogue admins to Arbcom, I have no reason not to. Last time, the sysop in question was shamefully desysopped for a catalogue of abuse of position.  I have no problem doing this.  The Rambling Man (talk) 09:51, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Doug Weller and my stroke in December–January
Perhaps you should have read what User:Doug Weller and User:Newyorkbrad have mentioned. You seem to have ignored the ongoing problem of my stroke: you seem to have written in a matter-of-fact fashion, as if you didn't care about it. Please could you be more careful next time. When I was informed about the status of my stroke, I did not expect an editor (Francis Schonken) to add the comment "rvv". That was not vandalism in any way and I think you were out-of-order in spraying acronyms like WP:IDHT. Sometimes things happen on wikipedia which are not just word-games. Mathsci (talk) 09:59, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok. Stop edit-warring your comments onto others' talk pages. Next time I'll use the templated warning so you don't have confusion on the subject. If you're not feeling well enough to edit responsibly, maybe you ought to take a further wiki-break. Hope you feel better soon. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 10:20, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

My wikipedia brthday
Thanks for the 15th-birthday note on my talk page ... but I beat you to it! http://granitegeek.concordmonitor.com/2018/01/23/wikipedia-anniversary-15-years-hunt-concord-creator/ - DavidWBrooks (talk) 17:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Harvard Crimson
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Harvard Crimson. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 26
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 26, December – January 2018 <div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
 * # 1Lib1Ref
 * User Group update
 * Global branches update
 * Spotlight: What can we glean from OCLC’s experience with library staff learning Wikipedia?
 * Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

This Month in Education: January 2018
<span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:60px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">This Month in Education <span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:20px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:900px;"> Volume 7 | Issue 1 | January 2018

<span style="font-weight:regular; text-align:center; font-size:14px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:1000px;">This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

<span style="color:white; font-size:24px; font-family:times new roman; display:block; background:#339966; width:1000px;">In This Issue

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 18:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Crimean War edit
Hi Chris, İskender is the Turkish spelling, I changed it to English which is Iskender. 77.166.30.3 (talk) 16:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback, I will be more careful from now on. 77.166.30.3 (talk) 12:06, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Neale Family user page
Hi Chris Troutman, I think you misunderstood the situation. I was not upset that Neale Family linked to a disambig page. That page had been a redirect to an article ( Maria page Neale Family had created. I converted it to a disambig page when I created a second article about a ship named Maria, and prior to creating a couple more. I changed the Neale Family user page so that they could more readily find their article without going through the step of going to the now disambig page and then clicking through to their article. Cheers, Acad Ronin (talk) 00:19, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Per WP:NOBAN, while you can edit others' user pages, I don't generally think you should. I revert user page vandalism and I don't prefer to turn a blind eye to edits like yours, which serve no actual purpose. You may think it's a good or helpful idea but someone else's user page isn't for you to correct. I'm willing to chalk this up to a disagreement, as I acknowledge that you meant well. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:25, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg None
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Blurpeace • Dana boomer • Deltabeignet • Denelson83 • Grandiose • Salvidrim! • Ymblanter

Guideline and policy news
 * An RfC has closed with a consensus that candidates at WP:RFA must disclose whether they have ever edited for pay and that administrators may never use administrative tools as part of any paid editing activity, except when they are acting as a Wikipedian-in-Residence or when the payment is made by the Wikimedia Foundation or an affiliate of the WMF.
 * Editors responding to threats of harm can now contact the Wikimedia Foundation's emergency address by using Special:EmailUser/Emergency. If you don't have email enabled on Wikipedia, directly contacting the emergency address using your own email client remains an option.

Technical news
 * A tag will now be automatically applied to edits that blank a page, turn a page into a redirect, remove/replace almost all content in a page, undo an edit, or rollback an edit. These edits were previously denoted solely by automatic edit summaries.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee has enacted a change to the discretionary sanctions procedure which requires administrators to add a standardized editnotice when placing page restrictions. Editors cannot be sanctioned for violations of page restrictions if this editnotice was not in place at the time of the violation.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

My sincerest apologies
I was looking back at old AfD's I voted in, and noticed that my conduct at that of Panoply Media was completely unacceptable. My sincerest apologies. As a inexperienced editor, I for some reason felt that you had a personal vendetta against me, and thusly became defensive. That was something I should never have done. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:00, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for saying so, but I don't think your comments are anything for which you need apologize. In the AfD, you made a WP:NOTCLEANUP argument, which is fair. I acknowledge that AfD, MfD, and CfD can get heated. Each of us that actually cares about Wikipedia tend to be writers and seeing content slated for deletion often gets taken as an affront. It happens all the time. I took no offense at your comments a year ago; no harm, no foul. Good luck to you. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:33, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:1948 Palestine war
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1948 Palestine war. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: New Year Backlog Drive results:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
 * We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!
 * We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
 * Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

WP:NPA
Here and here you accuse me of something I did not do. What evidence do you have? I do have a lot of personal biases, but I make my best to follow all policies while editing any main space pages of my interest. My very best wishes (talk) 00:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * You have continued to add the link to Navalny's YouTube page against consensus. Your talk page of "poetry" seems to evince your political beliefs on the subject. I took the matter to DRN since you refuse to be reasonable. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:31, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, sure you can consider my texts in userspace as a declaration of my personal views and biases. Making an open disclosure of COI (I do not have one in this subject area) or personal views is actually a good thing. It maybe bad if it spells to mainspace, but I am very careful to avoid it. As about this particular disagreement, I believe it is very minor and do not really worth a lot of anyone else time. My very best wishes (talk) 00:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Too late for that. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Too late for what? This is simply non-issue, and I fixed it (I hope) in two minutes. My very best wishes (talk) 01:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Oakland Coliseum station
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oakland Coliseum station. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Legacypac
Note I used the AfC comment tool I did not put the page in AfC. Legacypac (talk) 02:06, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yep. I didn't realize userspace draft put those pages into a maintenance category. Thanks for pointing that out and for your consideration in this matter. I acknowledge that you're a good-faith editor helping the project. I'm just really sensitive about my drafts. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 02:09, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorted by date and by username  and this Wikiproject  Over time I've cleared some of the oldest date cats and some of the letters of the alphabet. You would not believe the amount of spam, copyvio, and attack pages in there. I even find articles that can be promoted to mainspace as is. Legacypac (talk) 02:35, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Message from StarWars&TTTEFan2018
Chris troutman, I'm sorry for doing it. But I didn't mean it in a bad way. It's all because people treat me around and you should send User talk:Trivialist a message too. They say bad things about me so I don't do anything to hurt Wikipedia. I try to provide good faith and I get blamed and some people thank me while others thank me for doing that and User:Trivialist is blind as a bat is suddenly making people never know what happens and you should believe me and that is my message. Can you please send me a good message back which you probably won't, but you should. Please agree with me and please. DO NOT SAY NO! OK. And don't send me a bad message back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StarWars&TTTEFan2018 (talk • contribs) 00:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Meiyu tag revert
Sorry, but why did you reverted my edit? I is it good bad? Why? 121.138.198.42 (talk) 14:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Please note that of this article in June of last year. An admin subsequently restored the redirect. This wrestling group isn't generally notable.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 14:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Continuation War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Continuation War. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

DAVEY2010
I assume a friend of yours? he vandilses my talk page and nothing happens I comment on his and I get threats. Listen mate I'm fed up of this every single edit i make he reverts valid or not and I'm the bad guy I always tjought Wikipedia was about the users but it seems its for the elite those who have no life and can spend all day and night on here so ban me it doesn't really matter Wikipedia is now a closed shop only open to those who have mo life well I have a life so thank you and good night... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kev inr (talk • contribs) 23:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I am like a nation. I have no friends... only interests. It is my interest to stop the harassment of useful contributors and punish the hell out of ne'er-do-wells. Editors can issue warnings. That doesn't give you permission to vandalize user pages to issue meaningless attacks. And don't lie to me; we both know you don't have a life to keep you busy. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 23:18, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

ha ha with my children job and of course wife oh yes I have a very FULL life thank you....... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kev inr (talk • contribs) 23:26, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Simon's Sircus
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Simon's Sircus. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

GOCE February 2018 news
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Athsquare needs your help!!
listen guys stop deleting my post I just put a small addition for a class I need it for a grade IF YOU DONT LIKE THE ADDITION PLEASE LEAVE IT UP FOR A WEEK THEN DELETE IT I DONT CARE!!!!! AGAIN I AM DOING IT FOR A CLASS JUST TO GET AN EDIT IN> THANKS IN ADVANCE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Athsquare (talk • contribs) 23:28, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm more than happy to check over your editing, and revert and warn you when needed. I would hate to think that you couldn't find help on Wikipedia. That said, does your instructor have a point of contact at Wikipedia? We actually have a program to help students. In fact, if your teacher hasn't contacted Wikipedia already, please have them look into https://wikiedu.org/teach-with-wikipedia/. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 23:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * LISTEN this is the stupidest assignment ever first of all Wikipedia isn't ever allowed to be a real source now I got jerks like you deleting my content I am just trying to get a good grade in grad school can you guys please stop being jerks and stop deleting my stuff like I said if you want to delete it next sunday please by all means do so I have never used wiki before and I never will after this so cut me some slack I have a lot of stress in this grad program then to have you jerks deleting my content over and over — Preceding unsigned comment added by Athsquare (talk • contribs) 23:37, 24 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Hey, I left them a note on their talk page with instructions to get their professor to contact Wiki Education or at least someone on Wikipedia. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:37, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, although I'm beginning to wonder if the editor in question was using the claim of classroom involvement as an excuse. I hope WikiEd is able to wrangle the teacher in question. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:38, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Banderites
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Banderites. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

This Month in Education: February 2018
<span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:60px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">This Month in Education <span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:20px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:900px;"> Volume 7 | Issue 2 | February 2018

<span style="font-weight:regular; text-align:center; font-size:14px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:1000px;">This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

<span style="color:white; font-size:24px; font-family:times new roman; display:block; background:#339966; width:1000px;">In This Issue

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 08:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Refactoring
is removing a legitimate comment by, in violation of WP:REFACTOR. That's what I was trying to correct. I'm not sure why you've reverted me. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 10:15, 1 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Check Dave's history and you will see that "Iggy" is a plagiarist (my greeting) &#8209; &#8209; Gareth Griffith&#8209;Jones&#160;The Welsh Buzzard &#8209; &#8209; 10:20, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * You are incorrect. You don't own a greeting or any other piece of code. You donated it to the community when you hit "publish." For example, what about these holiday greetings from this past Christmas and New Years'? Are those editors plagiarizing someone else's code? Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 10:23, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Google Dictionary
Its Google Dictionary, not really Google Search. See the article. I agree that its not ideal though, as it doesnt have another way of linkage, and will reference other texts. -Inowen (talk) 11:03, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * First, just goes to the so-called dictionary. Second, even if I type in the word "empire" the result fails WP:SPS. Google is fed by stuff like Wikipedia and Wiktionary, among others. Just because Wikipedia has an article about Google Dictionary does not make Google Dictionary a reliable source. You cannot be so cavalier and uncritical of what sources you use. Finally, you added content to the lede of that article, which is 99% of the time a bad idea, indicative of poor understanding.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 11:10, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Lourdes†
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg AngelOfSadness • Bhadani • Chris 73 • Coren • Friday • Midom • Mike V
 * † Lourdes has requested that her admin rights be temporarily removed, pending her return from travel.

Guideline and policy news
 * The autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) is scheduled to end on 14 March 2018. The results of the research collected can be read on Meta Wiki.
 * Community ban discussions must now stay open for at least 24 hours prior to being closed.
 * A change to the administrator inactivity policy has been proposed. Under the proposal, if an administrator has not used their admin tools for a period of five years and is subsequently desysopped for inactivity, the administrator would have to file a new RfA in order to regain the tools.
 * A change to the banning policy has been proposed which would specify conditions under which a repeat sockmaster may be considered de facto banned, reducing the need to start a community ban discussion for these users.

Technical news
 * CheckUsers are now able to view private data such as IP addresses from the edit filter log, e.g. when the filter prevents a user from creating an account. Previously, this information was unavailable to CheckUsers because access to it could not be logged.
 * The edit filter has a new feature  that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.

Miscellaneous
 * Following the 2018 Steward elections, the following users are our new stewards:, , , ,.

Obituaries
 * Bhadani (Gangadhar Bhadani) passed away on 8 February 2018. Bhadani joined Wikipedia in March 2005 and became an administrator in September 2005. While he was active, Bhadani was regarded as one of the most prolific Wikipedians from India.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.

Our top scorers in round 1 were:


 * 🇺🇸 Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
 * 🇩🇪 FrB.TG, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
 * 🇮🇳 Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.
 * 🇺🇸 Ceranthor, 🇮🇳 Numerounovedant, Carbrera, 🇳🇱 Farang Rak Tham and 🇷🇴 Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Vanamonde (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Societal Collapse – Mali Empire, Volga Bulgaria
Hi, sorry for being a fairly amateur contributor to Wikipedia, I wasn't logged in when I did the changes.

I'm not sure if that is the correct way to answer to you, in general I don't see any Messaging feature in Wikipedia so I guess I have to do it this way.

I don't understand : 1) Why I should provide a link to a reliable source when none of the other examples of societal collapse listed have one. I'm not against it, I can provide links, I just don't understand why only the examples I want to add should have links to such sources, when the others have not. For Mali, i have UNESCO's A General History of Africa ; for Volga Bulgaria, I think everything is pretty much explained on the relevant Wikipedia page, isn't that enough ? Anyway, a process such as Societal Collapse is so complex that is difficult to find one exact quote saying « And then, society collapsed ».

2) Why according to you those examples do not qualify as societal collapse.

– The Mali Empire that was a highly centralized and developed country ruling an extensive territory disappeared after the main trading cities were lost to the Songhai and the Tuareg and the empire failed to reconquer them. This led to a loss of central authority, and as the Western provinces started trading directly with Europeans, they got empowered and took their independance. A lot of lands were lost to the Fulani hordes, too. Malian culture continued but it wasn't anymore the complex caste society of the Middle Ages, some rulers abandoned islam (the religion of the traders and of their former North Africa allies) to revert to traditional religion. In general chaos ensued for a long period in the whole region as Saharan trade lost its importance (since trade was now mostly done with Europeans on the coast) and the slave-hunt became the main economic activity. In general Western Africa from the 17th to 19th century can best be qualified as a post-apocalyptic one. Major cities such as Niani and Timbuktu were abandoned. Isn't that societal collapse ?

– Volga Bulgaria, a major trading country whose capital was at one time one of the biggest cities in the world, whose influence was such that they almost converted Russia to islam, was destroyed by the Tatar, 80 % of its population was slaughtered, all its buildings were razed except one tower in Yelabuga, and the fugitives, chased from their lands, adopted a new name and religion. Isn't that societal collapse ?

Thank you for your answer. Ghiznuk (talk) 19:53, 2 March 2018 (UTC) Ghiznuk
 * Thanks for signing-in and leaving the message. There are two issues here: First, I reverted you because the content you added was unreferenced. You are correct that the entire section of Societal collapse is unreferenced but if I don't revert you, it will take even more research later on to fix what's wrong there, unless we just delete the whole section. As Captain Picard once said, we must draw the line here, no farther. Second, neither of the articles you pointed to (Volga Bulgaria and Mali Empire) indicate that their societies collapsed. Those polities either split or were conquered, each of which happens often. Cases like the Mayans or Cahokia explicate collapse. I'll grant that other entries listed might not belong, either. So while I understand what you're saying, your conclusion that those societies collapsed is original research. I need to see you cite a reliable source that says those societies collapsed in the terms the article about societal collapse sets out. I hope my answer suffices. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 23:30, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

What are you doing?
The user blanked their own talk page in violation of Wikipedia policy. I reverted that back so it's immediately obvious to anyone reviewing that account why that user has been blocked. What are you doing? --Coolcaesar (talk) 22:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Do you even know what policy is? WP:OWNTALK points to WP:UP. Both specify that the only things that can't be removed by a registered user are "Declined unblock requests regarding a currently active block, Miscellany for deletion tags (while the discussion is in progress), Speedy deletion tags and requests for uninvolved administrator help". The material you restored is none of those things, so YOU are in violation of policy. If you want to know why an acocunt is blocked, just look at their contributions list (it'll say at the top) or look at their block log. I expect an editor like you to actually read the rules before you come to my talk page to complain. Go back to your law school to get your money back. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:23, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Can you dial it back a bit please? I've seen experienced admins make the same error. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 22:27, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Seconded. Primefac (talk) 22:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok. I overreacted. I'm a bitter frustrated man. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:29, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Looking through Unusual articles might help with that a bit. The stuff we have on here... --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 22:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * That page should be titled "Wikipedia:Stuff we need to get on the Main Page ASAP." Ian.thomson (talk) 22:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks Chris. I was going to try to reason with them, especially when they did a couple of OK edits, and I was halfway through composing a nice talk page message to them - but I think we are past that point now ... I do appreciate your vigilance! cheers DBaK (talk) 19:11, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Glad to help. I'm grateful that editor did us the favor of announcing that they were editing in bad faith, as a few constructive edits might have some Wikipedians (not me) pause to be thoughtful in reply. Certainly, I hate the name-calling and abuse hurled at regular editors like you who, looking at your username, have become disillusioned, bitter, and knackered in the process of contributing. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:16, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Ha, quite! It's taken quite a while of marinading myself in gall to get to this peak of vileness and hatred! Cheers DBaK (talk) 19:19, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Enrique Iglesias
Maybe that source (which is the one used in the article Julio Iglesias Sr., as I have made clear with my comment) is not good enough. However, I have also specified the source used in this very article Enrique Iglesias, which contradicts the assertion that the kidnapping took place in 1986. I would think it is not so smart to revert from a maybe not enough reliable to a provably false date. By the way: People apparently already are joking about this less than clever way of fact checking, see, — both edits were completely unsourced, silently accepted, and they followed this good-faith-distortion:  (completely unsourced, of course). Now do as you please with this mess. --2003:C2:A3DC:E900:4020:2174:F62C:E2C2 (talk) 18:54, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi. I don't care. Fault me if you will, but I judge edits (while in a countervandalism role) in a vacuum. I'm not looking at the wider pattern of editing nor do I have any idea what the correct fact is. You added a Daily Mail source and I can revert that on sight. For the sort of responsibility you want me to exercise, it would require me to be anything more than a drive-by reverter. I'm following that article only because it seems to attract vandalism and I can pad my edit count but just hitting a couple buttons maybe a few times a month. What I recommend, if you care about making the article correct, is finding a reliable source(s) and then use that source(s) to fix what's wrong. If you're trying to make the article to elucidate a theory, then please discuss on the article's talk page. "People apparently already are joking about this... " I'm a misanthrope; I don't care how the sheep are braying. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:03, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * No, you have ignored one of my well-specified and easy-accessible sources, which is not lege artis when checking edits. If you had considered it, you simply could have removed the date. The risk of making an article worse by reinstating an unsourced false assertion is in this case completely your responsibility. --2003:C2:A3DC:E900:4020:2174:F62C:E2C2 (talk) 19:40, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I found an actual source and put the date of the kidnapping to 1981. It wasn't so hard but it was worth more to you who won't register an account than it was to me, who just enjoys reverting vandals semi-automatically. You made me do work that you could have and should have done yourself. In the immortal words of George W. Bush: "you're welcome." Chris Troutman  ( talk )

Please comment on Talk:Winter War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Winter War. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks so much; I appreciate it, although I'm just trying to maintain what we've all worked so hard to create. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 06:21, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's an essential thing, but it's good to see people working hard at it. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 06:34, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Warning
Hey, where can I find the "" template? I wanna add it to my twinkle menu! - the <em style="font-family:Matisse itc;color:red">WOLF  child  16:01, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * You should be careful about encouraging me. The president of my fan club will haul me to ANI again if I don't remain civil. SOFREP's podcast and website has some interesting material but you get fans of that stuff trying to use the self-serving interviews there as if they were journalism, and Wikipedia attracts too many editors looking to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. The word "nope" isn't defamatory or obscene but it's the right level of dismissive to help new editors stop and read. I really think being nice and AGF'ing puts too much sugar in the medicine. Happy hunting.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:10, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you
Hallo Chris troutman,

Thank you for your kind message. I am surprised myself, I didn't know, but nice to receive such a reminder :-). Happy editing! Gryffindor (talk) 21:18, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Haynes Purple Heart record claim
Did you ever get word back from Don Shipley on Curry T. Hayne's claim of ten Purple Hearts? The claim is still on the Purple Heart article, and if it is shown to be false it ought to be removed. Kges1901 (talk) 21:54, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Nope, and I've been patiently waiting. For the time being, we have a Congressman saying the claim is true and I have nothing solid to refute it. Guaranteed, I'll let you know the minute I hear back. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

What a swell party this is
Can I ask you a question, please? Did you ever give advice to the tune that if an editor gets blocked here, the thing to do is "kowtow" to the admins who blocked them? I hazily recall reading something like that written under a similar handle to yours. If you didn't, my apologies for the memory error. If you did, then could you please clarify if you were serious? Thanks in advance. -The Gnome (talk) 16:13, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes. It took me awhile to find the comment in question but it was in response to a poorly-thought unblock request. (BTW, WMF needs a better interface to allow me to search my contributions for words like "kowtow.") Yes, I was being serious. WP:NICETRY is pretty clear that an unabashed admission of wrong-doing is required. Blocked parties could argue that the block wasn't made in a preventative manner or that the block was unrelated to conduct. The nonsense unblock request  gave was wrong in character, though understandable coming from an outsider/n00b. Aggravating the admins is just going to result in a swift rejection. Sadly, my sage advice was not considered and the offending party remains blocked.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 23:12, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the response. Yes, that's what it was. Your proposal was definitely constructive and helpful. The word "kowtow" though stuck a bit sorely - for a reason. IMVHO, it's the wrong word to use. The directions in WP:NICETRY most certainly do not direct the blocked party to kneel and bow down in a "prostrate position" with your "head touching the ground" and showing the "highest form of reverence" to the almighty administration. :-) The directions advise something, let's say, milder. But anyway. Thanks, again. -The Gnome (talk) 23:28, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Appeasement
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Appeasement. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Collaboration with the Axis Powers during World War II
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Collaboration with the Axis Powers during World War II. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

We post to talk pages, not vandalize user pages!
Sorry, I clicked on the wrong link. I should have realized something was wrong, when I saw the page was empty. Comfr (talk) 20:30, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Gentle reminder
We all get into passionate discussions, like you have at Wikipedia talk:Notability (people). A reminder that Wikipedia is WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 08:43, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:National Rifle Association
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:National Rifle Association. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Sad
I constantly get reprimanded by lots of people,even when I am trying to do good. I don't know if I belong on Wikipedia. Me at my happiest! 12:52, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think you do, quite honestly. Wikipedia is about writing encyclopedic content. This isn't a social networking site. We're not here to fool around with posting images in sandboxes or customizing user pages. We give editors a fair bit of latitude but the expectation is that we're trying to improve articles, templates, categories, and other content. That's not for everyone. Some people just like how easy it is to edit a wiki. If you spend all your time in your sandboxes, that's your business. But when you keep creating bad articles or posting the wrong stuff, you create a mess for the rest of us to clean up, which isn't fair to us and I know it doesn't make you happy. Instead of editing, try reading all of our policies and guidelines. Or, ask to be adopted. That might really help you. But based upon your editing thus far, I think you need to find a different hobby. You can always come back a few years from now if you decide you want to be an editor. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 13:00, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

I have gotten rid of everything on my user page and will return in several years.Goodbye.-CM88 — Preceding unsigned comment added by CrazyMinecart88 (talk • contribs) 16:29, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

User:MireiaPV/sandbox
User:MireiaPV/sandbox MireiaPV (talk) 19:52, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks
I appreciate the holiday greetings you sent in December. Thanks for keeping an eye on the Fat Leonard article. I suspect the IP editor changed the wording of the circumstances of the Brooks case because they are familiar with the family or is even a member. The original quote from the WashPost indicated the "family" accepted the services of prostitutes. I expect that statement may have been overly broad, so I reduced the quote to eliminate that specific emolument as Brooks himself was probably the only recipient. I didn't read the pleadings/original source document. Activist (talk) 00:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Question
I dont follow. User:Justlettersandnumbers is singling me out because I reported one of his articles for copyright. My article Sabrina Schloss is perfectly applicable to guidelines for Wiki. I undid vandalism by User:Justlettersandnumbers. Makro (talk) 22:43, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * You are incorrect. Justlettersandnumbers removed sources from Sabrina Schloss because he says that the sources don't support the article's assertions, or aren't independent. This is a content dispute and you made a serious mistake by reporting him at AIV when you should have discussed it on the talk page. You also removed the AfD tag, which is not allowed. I recommend you quit editing Wikipedia right this minute and stay away for at least several months lest you end up blocked. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:48, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * A) I reverted Justlettersandnumbers vandalism. B) I reported him because it wasn't the first time he has vandalised an article I created. C) i'm pretty sure your threats are acts of bullying against Wiki standards. I am a perfectly fine editor. I always use accurate sources. Makro (talk) 22:51, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Your, as no one agrees with your interpretation. I'm only recommending you not continue to run headlong into traffic. If you don't like my advice, then get off my talk page. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:57, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * It was refused by you. Are you two working together to bully me? Makro (talk) 23:01, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * No, made that edit to erase your complaint. I simply pointed out that your claim was wrong. You can't falsely report editors at drama boards. If you don't understand then I think you should avoid noticeboards.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 23:03, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I correctly reported him.Makro (talk) 23:06, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Chris, I've started a discussion at ANI – specifically about the repeated BLP violations – and have mentioned you there. Sorry about that! Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:14, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Reverts
Just curious as to why two MMA results were reverted. You say it is because they are un-sourced, but never in my life have I seen anyone have to source a result on a MMA record box. Here are the last two UFC headliner winners with no sources next to their wins: Cris Cyborg and Alexander Volkov. Why the sudden strictness demanding a source on a win? Udar55 (talk) 00:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for asking this question. Wikipedia is a big place and things like the strictness of enforcement of WP:V (the policy that requires you provide sources) does seem to vary. I stay away from articles about athletes generally because they're always populated by fanboys that only seek to write their narrative about whomever. I have only a couple articles about fighters on my watchlist and I enforce WP:V and WP:CITE there as I would anywhere. I happened to stumble upon your edits and I reverted them because you haven't provided a source. Just because no one reverted you before does not mean your editing is acceptable. Although you've been an editor for ten years, I invite you to read up on Wikipedia's requirements and get with our program. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 14:51, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. But I still have the question - why ask for a source in results tables? When mentioned a result in preceding text, the sources are always there. It is a Wikipedia MMA staple to source in the text body and done on hundreds of pages per year. However, I've never seen anyone put (or ask for) a source in a record box. I'll gladly add that if that satisfies you, but I'm not kidding when I say literally no one puts sources in MMA record boxes (unless something odd happened and is mentioned in the notes section). Udar55 (talk) 17:38, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, I'll first give you my standard countervandalism cop-out: doing countervandalism work, I'm judging each edit on its own. Adding material likely to be challenged without also adding a reliable source in that same edit can be reverted on sight. I can know nothing about the subject and still revert. That said, I took a look at each before reverting. as well as  were both legitimate. Had there been sourced text in the article, I would agree you might not have to add a citation for the table, too. But in neither case was there a mention of the event's outcome in the article's text or any citation to back it up. Further, at the time of my revert  at the article about the event itself. As you might imagine, I hold WikiProject Mixed martial arts in some contempt due to their lack of professionalism. Biographical articles about fighters are not immune to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies and WP:MMA would do well to be more stringent in restraining the over-excited fans who can't tell a citation from an armbar.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:43, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of the busiest airports in Europe
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of the busiest airports in Europe. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Martsander
Thank you for dealing with the nonsense on my talkpage from User:Martsander. After Martsander had been banished from WP, some further edits appeared on the article Mart Sander by a brand new editor (see Special:Contributions/82.131.14.105). These were largely useful in containing relevant citations, but one of them had the summary " Priit Pullerits, the noted journalist, objects to being referred to as Pret Pullerit, as edited by the illiterate David Conway / Smerus." I have been called worse things on WP, so I expect I will survive; but might this be a sockpuppet/alias of Martsander?--Smerus (talk) 08:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I tend to agree. Here you go. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 08:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Many thanks.--Smerus (talk) 09:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * and here by the way is another similar intervention from an anonymous editor whom I beleive is likely to be the same person. Can one consider semi-protection for the page in the circumstances?--Smerus (talk) 15:23, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't see the problem with that edit. If the edit doesn't have duck-like qualities and it's not vandalistic, then you have no grounds to ask for protection. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 15:37, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * So long as the belief that the block of Martsander was due only to username, then there's no going after IPs or other users for socking. As it is, was unsourced and rightfully reverted. The edit summary isn't duck-like enough for me and the IP doesn't resolve to Estonia. You can have more than one crank editing that article. Further, you can ask for protection only if an article is likely to receive a flood of vandalism. A handful of edits here and there, even a couple a day, might not be enough to pass muster at RFPP. While we're on the subject, I'm not your hatchet man; I remind you that a lynch mob formed at ANI about me not so long ago. Perhaps you should act on your behalf.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 23:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * No indeed, I was only asking for advice. I am not strong on the procedural side at WP. With thanks, --Smerus (talk) 07:51, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

New Page Review Newsletter No.10
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages! ACTRIAL:
 * ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing
 * Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking  place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
 * While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

Administrators' newsletter – April 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg 331dot • Cordless Larry • ClueBot NG
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Gogo Dodo • Pb30 • Sebastiankessel • Seicer • SoLando

Guideline and policy news
 * Administrators who have been desysopped due to inactivity are now required to have performed at least one (logged) administrative action in the past 5 years in order to qualify for a resysop without going through a new RfA.
 * Editors who have been found to have engaged in sockpuppetry on at least two occasions after an initial indefinite block, for whatever reason, are now automatically considered banned by the community without the need to start a ban discussion.
 * The notability guideline for organizations and companies has been substantially rewritten following the closure of this request for comment. Among the changes, the guideline more clearly defines the sourcing requirements needed for organizations and companies to be considered notable.
 * The six-month autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) ended on 14 March 2018. The post-trial research report has been published. A request for comment is now underway to determine whether the restrictions from ACTRIAL should be implemented permanently.

Technical news
 * There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee is considering a change to the discretionary sanctions procedures which would require an editor to appeal a sanction to the community at WP:AE or WP:AN prior to appealing directly to the Arbitration Committee at WP:ARCA.

Miscellaneous
 * A discussion has closed which concluded that administrators are not required to enable email, though many editors suggested doing so as a matter of best practice.
 * The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team has released the Interaction Timeline. This shows a chronologic history for two users on pages where they have both made edits, which may be helpful in identifying sockpuppetry and investigating editing disputes.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Yeah for the squirrels
They made it to DYK. It is also the first listing. I am so proud. Best Regards, Barbara ✐ ✉  10:26, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm happy for you that your eccentricity has found a home in the humor column at The Signpost and the April Fools' DYK. I think it's important that you have your niches within which to contribute. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you? Best Regards, Barbara ✐ ✉  01:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)



This Month in Education: March 2018
<span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:60px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">This Month in Education <span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:20px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:900px;"> Volume 7 | Issue 3 | March 2018

<span style="font-weight:regular; text-align:center; font-size:14px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:1000px;">This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

<span style="color:white; font-size:24px; font-family:times new roman; display:block; background:#339966; width:1000px;">In This Issue

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 10:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Buckingham Palace
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Buckingham Palace. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

My edit on Harry-Oscar 1812 (my previous account)
Just recieved a message from you claiming I vandalised Harry-Oscar 1812 (talk page), which is indeed my first account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anticitizen 98 (talk • contribs) 12:29, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm glad you've explained that you changed accounts, although we only have your word for that. Had you made the change in your old account or at least claimed the other account on your current user page, I'd've left it alone. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

I also deleted this account's userpage, will be using my new account from now.Harry-Oscar 1812 (talk) 12:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Shayna Baszler
What more proof do you need? That's their official music page. What else do you need for a "source"? --Evil Yugi (talk) 01:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * First, that youTube video is a song uploaded by WWE. It doesn't say that it's her entrance theme. Second, you put a link in your edit summary. You need to make an in-line citation. Also, the rest of that section is cited and you restored all of that, as well. Please see WP:42 and WP:V. We need an independent, reliable source. You don't belong on Wikipedia if you can't be bothered to cite the stuff that you as a fan want to see. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 01:23, 5 April 2018 (UTC)


 * With all due respect, she's been using that song since she came into NXT. I'm not entirely sure how else to cite it except link video of the WWE Network, which is quite reliable in itself. I'm not a pro at editing and I probably never will be, but you could at least look into video footage and see that her theme is correct. --Evil Yugi (talk) 01:29, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No, you need to understand that not everything that is true can be cited. Wikipedia is a collection of what can be cited, not what's true. Because you're a fan, you're invested in making the article say what her current entrance theme is. But without a proper citation, that's a fact which can't be included. Some people might be willing to accept the WWE's YouTube channel and that's their fault, not mine. I'm not editing that article anymore because of you. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 15:59, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Got It (but can't add it)
I'm trying to add ref (7) to a CIA document: https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol-61-no-1/pdfs/virginia-halls-steps.pdf I cut and pasted the address, (it's about the discovery of Virginia Hall's trail she used across the Pyrenees) but doesn't seem to open the link. Any thoughts? thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CGralley (talk • contribs) 19:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Already fixed it. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Archive
Hi Chris, I very nearly headed to ANI fearing the worst!, I'm assuming your link was meant to point to this and not my reply moving on their page?, Hope you're okay, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 20:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * So sorry if I've caused misunderstanding. I am, as usual, unhappy with life and the human race. I was pointing enabled by a generous reading of WP:IAR. I wasn't pointing to any of your actions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 21:01, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Chris, Ah no worries I'm just glad you're okay!, Bizarrely I feel the same way as you .... If it helps it's all only going to get worse lol, Bring back the 90s I say!, I feel as if I want to revert that editor but at the same time I don't want to edit war on a deceased editors talkpage I feel that'd be disrespectful although one could say it's disrespectful to tamper with their talkpage like that, Anyway I'm just glad you're okay!, Take care, – Davey 2010 Talk 21:13, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Ichthus April 2018
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">

Project News By Lionelt

Belated Happy Easter and Kalo Pascha! We're excited to announce the return of our newsletter Ichthus! Getting this issue out was touch-and-go for a while. Check out what's happening at the Project:
 * There was a lively discussion about the Easter Did You Know nomination Christ the Lord is Risen Today
 * RFC at Knights of Columbus regarding a question about having Prop 8 in the lead
 * In anticipation of being nominated for Featured article, Presbyterian Church in the United States of America was put up for Peer Review by Ltwin
 * The death of Billy Graham on February 21 was a profound loss for many. For the Wikipedia reaction see this discussion. Graham received a blurb.
 * And... Order of Friars Minor--nominated by Chicbyaccident--is still waiting for a GA reviewer. Please help out if you can.

Achievements

In March the Project saw four articles promoted to GA-Class. They were the oh-so-irresistible Delilah (nom. MagicatthemovieS) (pictured), Edict of Torda (nom. Borsoka), David Meade (author) (nom. LovelyGirl7) and last but not least Black Christmas (2006 film) (nom. Drown_Soda). Black Christmas? How did that get in there lol? Congratulations to all of the nominators for a job well done!

Did You Know Nominated by The C of E

... that some people know Christ the Lord is risen today from Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch?"

Featured article Nominated by FutureTrillionaire

Jesus (7–2 BC to 30–33 AD) is the central figure of Christianity, whom the teachings of most Christian denominations hold to be the Son of God and the awaited Messiah of the Old Testament. Virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that a historical Jesus existed, although there is little agreement on the reliability of the gospel narratives and how closely the biblical Jesus reflects the historical Jesus. Most scholars agree that Jesus was a Jewish preacher from Galilee, was baptized by John the Baptist, and was crucified in Jerusalem on the orders of the Roman prefect, Pontius Pilate. Christians generally believe that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of a virgin, performed miracles, founded the Church, died by crucifixion as a sacrifice to achieve atonement, rose from the dead, and ascended into heaven, from which he will return. The great majority of Christians worship Jesus as the incarnation of God the Son, the second of three Persons of a Divine Trinity. A few Christian groups reject Trinitarianism, wholly or partly, as non-scriptural. In Islam, Jesus is considered one of God's important prophets and the Messiah.

Help wanted

We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project that you'd like to highlight? An issue that you'd like to bring to light? Post your inquiries or submission here. And if the publication of this issue is any indication, you're in for the ride of a lifetime!

- Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here Delivered: 00:13, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Mike Jackson (fighter)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Jackson_(fighter) The MMA Fighter page just got a Maintenance Tag. I did every i can to avoid that, but still tagged it. 🥇 BUS  riderSFUser (talk • contribs) 20:09, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Mike Jackson (fighter) fails WP:MMABIO, which requires three fights in a top-tier promotion. I thought the rule only required one fight, which is why I didn't nominate it for deletion, myself. When starting a new article, you need to be sure the subject passes some part of WP:N. When you just write stuff you have citations for without taking notability into consideration, your hard work could get deleted. Jackson already has one fight in the UFC and he's scheduled for a a second one. What I could do is move the article into draft space and then it can stay there unsubmitted until Jackson has his third fight in the UFC when he'll be notable. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:16, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * https://www.tapology.com/fightcenter/fighters/20057-mike-jackson Tapology stated he has 3 MMA Fights already?..CM PUNK fight going be 4th...how to fix. 🥇 BUS  riderSFUser (talk • contribs) 20:32, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The amateur fight doesn't count and neither does the Muay Thai fight. Jackson has only one UFC fight so far and he needs three. Not just planned matches, but fights he actually competed in. Shall I move it to draft or would you rather take your chances? It's possible people might ignore it for now but the subject isn't notable so it could be deleted. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:38, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I will take my chances because in many years people with Maintenance Tags are able keep the page alive within that status. Even if MMA Fighter Mike Jackson did not fight 3 UFC fight, its should be "worthy of notice" enough to know that he fighting a Former ECW Championship, World Heavyweight Championship, World Tag Team Championship, WWE Championship and WWE Intercontinental Championship. CM Punk is a superstar. I believe this is "worthy of notice" after the UFC225: CM PUNK vs Mike Jackson fight. 🥇 BUS  riderSFUser (talk • contribs) 21:25, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * That's not how notability works here. When the article is nominated for deletion, be sure to ask for a WP:REFUND. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 21:43, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Here submit my Challenges on one of your edits
I am here to challenge your recent edit stating that it does not follow a policy in Wikapedia, {WP:SPS} under "Sources that are usually not reliable" Dispute these source ""usually" not reliable. For this case i disagree for reddit part of the source. Mike "The Jackson" had a verification successfully passed (to confirm he the actual source of owner of the person) in the Q&A He made and this is a valid reliable source at this time. https://www.reddit.com/r/MMA/comments/5bp1dt/i_am_mike_the_truth_jackson_pro_fighter_and_mma/ and his Personal Site too (ok source for this case with use of WP:COMMONSENSE. Cheers.

Short Version 🥇 BUS  riderSFUser (talk • contribs) 23:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Mike "The Truth" Jackson Q&A at Reddit (its really him and was verified) for this case, this is a reliable source at this time.
 * The Podcast site/BIO Site is also reliable for this case. (No other google research can be found for his bio except that site.

Please comment on Talk:Muslim conquests of the Indian subcontinent
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Muslim conquests of the Indian subcontinent. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Your comments
I realize it's a contentious topic, but your demands and actions at User:Felsic2/Gun use were inappropriate. In the future please try to be more civil. –dlthewave ☎ 16:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I was civil. Simply because you disagree or you felt uncomfortable does not mean that I was not civil. Accordingly, I don't take much stock in your opinion of what's "inappropriate". Next time, I'll just send the matter to MfD since you did not want to be engaged on the topic or defend your actions. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:24, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Nutshell on common outcomes
I saw the addition you suggested to WP:OUTCOMES and its unfortunate that it wasn't better received. Editors are mistaking that page for guidelines, very much to the detriment of AfD discussions. If someone really wanted an effective page about precedent, it would list previous discussions on a case-by-case basis, not summaries without any context or background. Since there's no sourcing, its not even clear to what extent the common outcomes actually are common - though given that they're self-reinforcing, they probably become common once they're added to the page. Bangabandhu (talk) 02:47, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your message. Essays are generally opinion-based; they don't lay out facts and as you have intoned, if the facts actually pointed to something different that wouldn't help, at all. OUTCOMES is a political issue and the inclusionists will not be ceding ground any time in the near future. I didn't suggest the nutshell to push a deletionist narrative and I hope you can see that. I got ambushed by inclusionists while making good-faith deletion nominations. The nutshell was only meant to be an effective warning to editors strictly applying notability rules so no one else got bitten the way I was. You can always point to WP:OUTCOMESBASED if you see anyone cite OUTCOMES at AfD. Thanks again and good luck. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 03:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I think that the essay can be misused by deletionists or inclusionists if cited. It really has no place in an AfD discussion - as your nutshell succinctly highlighted. Personally I think that the essay should go becuase its potential for misuse is too high. Since that's unlikely to happen, the nutshell is a great move in the right direction. Bangabandhu (talk) 21:10, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jan Grabowski (historian)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jan Grabowski (historian). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Love that song
. Long version: Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:31, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Books & Bytes - Issue 27
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 27, February – March 2018 <div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
 * # 1Lib1Ref
 * New collections
 * Alexander Street (expansion)
 * Cambridge University Press (expansion)
 * User Group
 * Global branches update
 * Wiki Indaba Wikipedia + Library Discussions
 * Spotlight: Using librarianship to create a more equitable internet: LGBTQ+ advocacy as a wiki-librarian
 * Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Horst-Wessel-Lied
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Horst-Wessel-Lied. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Cyber bullying
Please refrain from cyber bullying. It is not constructive. The MOS lays out very specific guidelines. The use of links and boldface in the lead is one very particular no-no (see MOS:BOLDAVOID). The Ukraine article like all others must follow this like any other. If you are not familiar with MOS, please read it before editing further. -- MC 141.131.2.3 (talk) 18:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Please see MOS:BOLDTITLE. "The Ukraine" is considered an alternative name for Ukraine by everyone except the Ukrainian nationalists who cannot abide English-language usage. If you disagree you can discuss it on the talk page. Also, be advised that my use of warning templates is not bullying just because you say so. Do not doubt my ability to hasten the blocking of editors via the careful use of such templates. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Mike Pompeo
OK I am sarry now I just looked at all the other Cabnit Leaders and Rex Tillerson's page is the only one who has it if you want to you can take it off the Rex Tillerson page. Or should I do it for you I don't know who put Rex Tillerson's and not on all the others but you know what I am talking about right. And just want to let you know I have ADHD. And can't spell that good.96.36.68.29 (talk) 16:47, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries. I'm not the only editor looking at that page. As I've already done a lot of reverting there, I'm going to back off and let others figure out what they want to do with it. You can discuss the issue on the talk page, which is what I have been doing. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:49, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Page mover granted
Hello, Chris troutman. Your account has been [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AChris_troutman granted] the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when  is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:
 * Requested moves
 * Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Widr (talk) 05:59, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Mass message sender granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "massmessage-sender" user right, allowing you to send messages to multiple users at once. A few important things to note:
 * Messages should only be sent to groups of users who are likely to be interested in the topic.
 * For regular mailings such as those for WikiProjects, localized events, or newsletters, users should be informed of how they can unsubscribe from future mailings.
 * The mass messaging tool should never be used for canvassing with the intention of influencing the outcome of discussions.

For more information, refer to the guidance for use. If you do not want mass message sender rights anymore, just let me or any other administrator know and we will remove it. Thank you and happy editing! Widr (talk) 05:59, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Mass message sender on meta
Don't forget you will need mass message sender rights on meta. See Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom/Coordination for details. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:31, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * p.s. I'm about to start publication and there's an outside chance the step referred to above will fail, if my rights expired. It would probably make sense for you to complete it, rather than me re-applying for rights. If publication on meta fails for me ... would you do the honors? ☆ Bri (talk) 01:35, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Publication failed on meta, as I feared/expected. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:50, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Last minute editing
I haven't examined the publishing script yet, but am pretty sure I got a glitch you should know about. The first (zeroth) section apparently reverted to an earlier revision. It could be because I started the script, did some final edits on the section, then clicked the final "publish" button. It's likely that it was pinned to the revisions at the point the script was launched. Bottom line, it's probably necessary to cancel and restart the script if you make any changes to the issue. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:59, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

I'm going  to  stay  on  board as acting   E-in-C for  a while only, at  least  until we've got  the next  issue published. It was a very  steep  learning  curve for  me but it's a knowledge I  can now use. Be aware that 'publisher' is a bit  more than just  pressing  the buttons on the publishing  script -  there's a whole host  of other templates and transcusions to  check  before you  get  that  far. Stuff I wouldn't  even know where to  start with. I did most  of the heavy copyediting this time. Quite a nighmare. There are authors who submit very  clean copy, but  there are others whose prose sometimes needs a rewrite. Thank heavens I majored in  Creative Writing amongst other things. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:21, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * It looks like the latest issue has not gone out globally. Do you need me to publish? I have the global mass message sender and can do this this weekend if not today. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 15:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes please do send globally (meta mass message). I mentioned it here. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:08, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * You and may also wish to head over  here and get a quick consensus for the watchlist notice  in spite of the snark that was delivered last time. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:37, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I can confirm the latest issue went out globally. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:01, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Spot checked a few non-enwp users, and I see it too. Thanks for sending, Chris, and good luck with publication. I'll be around if you need any assistance, and it looks like Evad37 is here for help too. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:06, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Husan
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Husan. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

AN/COIN Discussion
In retrospect, WP:AN would have been the correct place, because we didn't have a paid editor but a warrior. Oh well. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:58, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Laurence “Scrappy” Blumer
Hello I received your message regarding the edits I did to my fathers profile on Wikipedia that we’re deleted by Canturberry tail. Thank You for your input. I am not versed on the rules and regulations of Wikipedia. As a Combat Veteran of the United States Army & Navy and being the Son of Laurence “Scrappy” Blumer I felt obligated to try and correct a few inaccuracies on his profile. Anyone wanting to improve his profile should read “ The Dynamite Gang” by Richard Groh. I also have several articles on my father as well as pictures I would be willing to donate to improve the accuracy of Wikipedia for the reader, thanks. Team Blumer (talk) 04:31, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reaching out. It's totally understandable why you're motivated to correct perceived errors. We get this sort of thing all the time. I once knew a woman who wanted me to fix an entry that listed her daughter's birthdate incorrectly. I told her that her personal experience giving birth wasn't something we could trust. We trust the LA Times, instead. Our interest is verifiability, not truth. As I have pointed out on your talk page, it is wholly inappropriate for you to edit an article about your dad. Instead, what you can do is list The Dynamite Gang as well as the articles you have on the article's talk page, so other editors know about them. Be sure to provide all the information on how editors can look-up these sources, including publication names, authors, publication dates, ISBNs, page numbers, etc. Wherever the data can be found, imagine Wikipedians like me going to the library to dig those sources up to use them. If you wanted to donate your pictures to public domain, you could upload them to Wikimedia Commons and then add links to those images on the talk page, too, so editors can find them and utilize them. If you're really itching to get changes made, visit the reward board where you can permissibly offer a reward to editors for their help. Thanks again for contacting me. Let me know if you have other questions. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 04:46, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Harassment and hounding
I feel harassed and now hounded by Davey2010. As you noted at his talk page, he stated he wanted me to stay away from it. If you also notice, he stated he wanted nothing more to do with me. So, if that's truly the case, why is he - just a short time afterward - reverting my edits and thanking me for something I put on in my own userspace? (see the following:,  This whole drama with him started almost two nights ago.  He reverted a photo I had placed in an article, when I went to his talk page to discuss it with him, he responded with the following edit summary: "It's 3 in the morning I'm not arguing - If you want it changed start an RFC".  Because he had I have been friendly for a couple of years, I thought it odd he wouldn't even discuss it, so I thought he was joking with his edit summary, or maybe just having a bad night.  In an attempt to lighten the mood, I responded by Trouting him here. His response? "Fuck off!, Just sayin'". To say I was confused would be an understatement. I figured maybe he just needed some time to sort some things out. Just a few days ago, he commented on an RfC I started and everything seemed fine. Curiously, after he told me to fuck off, he removed the FRS notice for that RfC (see here). And then this happened today: ; the reason why I went back to his talk page:, , , ,. His response: ""it does seem as if you have a vendetta" - You really know how to ruin things huh, Kindly don't ever post here again unless it's ANI notifications, I genuinely want nothing more to do with you.) . And then, my response to him re: reverting my edits: .  That's what you reverted off his talk page.  Fair enough.  But... in your message to me on my own talk page ("You were asked not to edit there, so I reverted you. On talk pages other than your own, you don't get to have the last word. If you still have issues with Davey2010, then I suggest a drama board would be more appropriate"), I don't still have issues with him. *HE* has issues with me, and I have no idea what they are.  Which I can live with, but not if he's going to continue to revert my edits and then "thank" me for something I placed on my own talk page and certainly not after he says, "I genuinely want nothing more to do with you".  That's harassment.  And, frankly, I believe that he's reverting my reversions knowing I can't revert again because of my 1RR restriction.  I don't want to go to a drama board.  I'm coming to you because you stepped in.  I'm hoping you can get him to change his behavior.  It feels very, very much like harassment and I'd like it to stop.  Thanks. <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">-- ψλ  ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">✉ ✓ 01:28, 8 April 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm about to head off so not going to write one gigantic statement so i'll keep it short and to the point - Winklevi having seen you argue with everyone you're IMHO someone who argues to death with someone until you get your own way or desired way ..... which is why I was unwilling to discuss it with you (also your talkpage message wasn't even a polite one you just came demanding I do something),
 * I don't have an issue with you and as I explained in one of my replies today I would've reverted regardless who the editor or admin was .....
 * The whole 1RR thing is horsehit - Truth be told I had absolutely no idea you were even on a 1rr ....
 * At the end of the day Winklevi If I object to you changing something I'll then say/revert - Alls you need to do is go to the talkpage and start an RFC - Had you been more of a community person I would've happily discussed it with you but I'm not discussing something with someone who sees it as "I'M RIGHT, YOU'RE WRONG, REVERT NOW" .....,
 * Last but least that whole segement on your userpage was directed at me and so in a sarcastic way I thanked you for it ..... but duly noted I shan't thank nor shall I interact with you - I don't like reverting you trust me but If I object to you doing something than it's my right to revert just like it is with everyone else - If you want to take my reverts as a personal thing than that's your problem not mine),
 * If you want an IBAN done by all means go & do that but for me life's too short for pathetic dramas such as this and quite frankly I think it's fair to say you and I have far better things to do with our time,
 * My suggestion would be if you want to change an image then start an RFC beforehand as that way it makes you, me and others happy. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:57, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Also inregards to the fuck off thing - After removing that section (telling you to start an RFC) you then decided trouting me was a great idea hence that fuck off comment, I shant keep replying here as I feel it's unfair to take up someone elses tp with it all. 02:03, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * "The whole 1RR thing is horsehit - Truth be told I had absolutely no idea you were even on a 1rr" Blatant lie.  You were the last one to comment at the AN filing where I was brought back from 0RR to 1RR.  Your words there were: "Support 1RR - The opposes all raise valid concerns however lets be honest this 0rr is a gag and it's great short term however I don't agree with it being an indef thing - Everyone deserves atleasr 1rr! - Obviously you shouldn't edit war but you also shouldn't be gagged indef." .  <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">-- ψλ  ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">✉ ✓ 02:12, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Blatant truth - We've never really interacted as such in all the years we've known each other so why in gods name would I remember something I commented on in 2017 that had absolutely nothing to do with me ?, I had genuinely forgot that I even commented on it because it clearly wasn't something worth remembering (After ANI, had we interacted on a daily basis then yes I would've remembered but as we haven't I clearly forgot) .... But then again had I had any sort of clue about your 1rr thing then that's still your issue not mine - I've never forced you to revert and tried to make you ? .... I've reverted stating my opinions and expected you to head to the talkpage on each occasion (the same way I revert any and every one) . – Davey 2010 Talk 02:30, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't know if you're having memory problems or what, but for a while, you and I exchanged several emails in the past regarding...ta-da!...images. We've interacted quite a bit since at least 2016.  Our interactions have always been friendly until you told me to fuck off a couple of nights ago.  The AN comment was in November (only five months ago) and you commented at the other ANI re: 0RR for me and Coffee's block discussion about a year ago as well.  We've exchanged pleasantries on numerous occasions including RfCs and article talk page discussions.  I don't know what the deal is, if you're having memory issues or what, but if you really, really "genuinely" don't want to have anything to do with me, then cut the crap.  Stop reverting my edits over and again and don't "Thank" me for something I did at my own talk page.  It really does feel like harassment and I want it to end.  Now.  I don't think that's asking too much in the least.  <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">-- ψλ  ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">✉ ✓ 02:45, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Nope my memory is absolutely fine thanks!, My bad we've interacted but it's never been a frequent thing..... It's not as if we interact on a daily basis .... Point is why would I remember something that doesn't remotely concern me ? ....., Anyway I fail to see what on earth my memory has got to do with any of this - Although I think it's you who may have memory issues as I have now explained twice that I will revert anyone (three times now!) and again I've already stated the thanking will stop,
 * No idea how many times I've said this but again start an RFC before you change any image and we'll all live happier lives,
 * Apologies Chris for this whole charade, I shant reply now. – Davey 2010 Talk 03:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

I took a quick look over your interactions with Davey as well as some of your editing history. I can see why you'd want to avoid ANI, although I suggested a drama board because I don't seek to use my talk page to host third party battles. I acknowledge your feelings about Davey's editing but I don't think I could consider what I'm seeing as harassment. I that the image you inserted was too bright. Per BRD, you should have discussed it on the talk page, not reverted each other. With your editing restrictions, you should avoid reverting any Wikipedian. There's a right way for you to contribute and this isn't it. I'll ask Davey to give you more room; I'm sorry you feel this has been unfair. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 03:21, 8 April 2018 (UTC) If you want Winkelvi to leave you alone, arguing with him here isn't accomplishing that. Winkelvi feels harassed and I think we both agree that our goal is not to make editors feel as if they were being bullied. Please let this drop. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 03:21, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Chris, I never want anyone to feel like they're being bullied that certainly isn't who I am although from an outside perspective I can see it may look different, Will do, Thanks for your comments. – Davey 2010 Talk 03:35, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Follow up events
, remember this? The drama continues from Davey2010. It started today with when I did this and just four minutes later, while I was creating an RfC at the article's talk page (see here), this happened. I left the following warning and message:. Responses are here:, , , ,. He finally came to the RfC to comment, and after I had invited a few editors I know who like to comment at image RfCs, Davey decided to copy and paste my message on another editor's talk page here. I only found out about it because I was pinged due to Davey forgetting (or not forgetting) to remove my signature from the copy and paste. I put the following on his talk page: here. He now has to be hounding/stalking my edits because all three of the editor talk pages where I placed that message... he had never edited their pages before. Following someone's edits is pretty odd behavior for someone who said to me, "I genuinely want nothing more to do with you" (diff is here) just a week ago and when you pointed out that I was feeling bullied then, asking him to drop it, he responded, "I never want anyone to feel like they're being bullied that certainly isn't who I am although from an outside perspective I can see it may look different, Will do...". I'm sorry, but I have no problem leaving the other editor alone. He doesn't seem to be able to do so. I'm not asking for any kind of sanction or interaction ban, but when I'm obviously being hounded/stalked, mocked, bullied, harassed, and told once more to "Fuck off" in an edit summary here when I've done nothing close to deserving such treatment, something stronger than offering an olive branch needs to be done. It would seem. I can continue to ignore him, but when he's purposefully trying to get my attention (for God knows what reason)... ugh. Any thoughts or suggestions? Once again, I appreciate your time and patience. <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">-- ψλ  ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">✉ ✓ 22:21, 14 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Apology:, I have to apologize to you. When I wrote the above, for whatever reason, I thought you are an administrator.  That's the only reason I came to you with this issue.  I feel pretty foolish now for bothering you with all this.  I hope you saw my response to you at AN/I - I did not ping you for the reason you speculated.  Again, my sincerest apologies for taking up your talk page space.  <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">-- ψλ  ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">✉ ✓ 03:51, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't feel you owed me an apology but I accept, regardless. Please do me a favor and avoid Davey. Sometimes editors don't get along and I'd really prefer we pursue improving articles rather than let arguments get in the way. Rest assured, I want every Wikipedian to get a fair shake; WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA protect all of us. I am not now nor will I ever be an admin, but I will check out WP:IBAN if the two of you can't stop this cycle of nonsense. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 04:11, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Dude, I am avoiding him. He's been seeking me out, seeking my edits out, commenting at RfCs I've started or participated in, not the other way around.  This is what I tried to explain to you last time, in this thread and the one previous.  My participation in the report at AN/I came about only because I have the page on my watchlist.  After reading it, and Davey's claims of "rarely" telling people to f-off, I couldn't let it go - that would be irresponsible. <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">-- ψλ  ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">✉ ✓ 04:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * "I couldn't let it go..." I disagree. Wikipedia allows you to chime in if you like, but your involvement is going to confuse the issue into this ongoing disagreement between the two of you when it was complaining about four-letter words. Your input is not useful as it's hard to assume good faith with your level of involvement. As Softlavender points out, I, myself, was the subject of an ANI lynch mob not long ago; she apparently feels that was a great solution. I can only assume you feel the same. I don't. Just because you see Davey being the recipient of a complaint does not obligate you to pitch in. You could choose to stay out of it. Let's remember that you have quite a block log, too. I would think avoiding drama would be the order of the day. I have been asking both sides for deescalation and I keep hearing replies that the other guy started it.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 05:08, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 May newsletter
The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:


 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
 * Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
 * 🇮🇳 Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
 * SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
 * 🇺🇸 Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
 * Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
 * Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs

So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg None
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Chochopk • Coffee • Gryffindor • Jimp • Knowledge Seeker • Lankiveil • Peridon • Rjd0060

Guideline and policy news
 * The ability to create articles directly in mainspace is now indefinitely restricted to autoconfirmed users.
 * A proposal is being discussed which would create a new "event coordinator" right that would allow users to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate limit.

Technical news
 * AbuseFilter has received numerous improvements, including an OOUI overhaul, syntax highlighting, ability to search existing filters, and a few new functions. In particular, the search feature can be used to ensure there aren't existing filters for what you need, and the new  function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to Logstash.
 * When blocking anonymous users, a cookie will be applied that reloads the block if the user changes their IP. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. This currently only occurs when hard-blocking accounts.
 * The block notice shown on mobile will soon be more informative and point users to a help page on how to request an unblock, just as it currently does on desktop.
 * There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee is seeking additional clerks to help with the arbitration process.

Obituaries
 * (Craig Franklin) passed away in mid-April. Lankiveil joined Wikipedia on 12 August 2004 and became an administrator on 31 August 2008. During his time with the Wikimedia community, Lankiveil served as an oversighter for the English Wikipedia and as president of Wikimedia Australia.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:05, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Ichthus: May 2018
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">

Project News By

Last month's auspicious relaunch of our newsletter precipitated something of an uproar in the Wikipedia community. What started as a localized edit war over censorship spilled over onto the Administrator's Noticeboard finally ending up at Wikipedia's supreme judicial body ArbCom. Their ruling resulted in the admonishment of administrator for his involvement in the dispute. The story was reported by Wikipedia's venerable flagship newspaper The Signpost.

The question of whether to delete all portals--including the 27 Christianity-related portals--was put to the Wikipedia community. Approximately 400 editors have participated in the protracted discussion. Going by !votes, Oppose deletion has a distinct majority. The original Christianity Portal was created on November 5, 2005 by and the following year he successfully nominated the portal for Featured Portal. has revived WikiProject Portals with hopes of revitalizing Wikipedia's system of 1,515 portals.

Stay up-to-date on the latest happenings at the Project

Achievements

Four articles in the Project were promoted to GA: Edict of Torda nom. by, Jim Bakker nom. by, Ralph Abernathy nom. by and Psalm 84 nom. by. The Psalm ends with "O Lord of hosts, blessed is the man that trusteth in thee." Words to live by. Please support our members and send some WikiLove to the nominators!

Featured article Nominated by Operation Auca was an attempt by five Evangelical Christian missionaries from the United States to make contact with the Huaorani people of the rainforest of Ecuador. The Huaorani, also known as the Aucas, were an isolated tribe known for their violence, both against their own people and outsiders who entered their territory. With the intention of being the first Protestants to evangelize the Huaorani, the missionaries began making regular flights over Huaorani settlements in September 1955, dropping gifts. After several months of exchanging gifts, on January 2, 1956, the missionaries established a camp at "Palm Beach", a sandbar along the Curaray River, a few miles from Huaorani settlements. Their efforts culminated on January 8, 1956, when all five&mdash;Jim Elliot, Nate Saint, Ed McCully, Peter Fleming, and Roger Youderian&mdash;were attacked and speared by a group of Huaorani warriors. The news of their deaths was broadcast around the world, and Life magazine covered the event with a photo essay. The deaths of the men galvanized the missionary effort in the United States, sparking an outpouring of funding for evangelization efforts around the world. Their work is still frequently remembered in evangelical publications, and in 2006, was the subject of the film production End of the Spear. (more...)

Did You Know Nominated by

"... that, shortly after being sentenced to death for treason, Ioan C. Filitti became manager of the National Theatre Bucharest?"

- Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom• Unsubscribe here Delivered: 19:15, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of English monarchs
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of English monarchs. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

This Month in Education: April 2018
<span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:60px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">This Month in Education <span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:20px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:900px;"> Volume 7 | Issue 4 | April 2018

<span style="font-weight:regular; text-align:center; font-size:14px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:1000px;">This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

<span style="color:white; font-size:24px; font-family:times new roman; display:block; background:#339966; width:1000px;">In This Issue

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 07:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

I am sorry.
Hi there, I just got caught up in something emotionally, and I do apologize for my comments directed to you, and Marianna UserHerName ping me or dm me if you respond.(talk) 19:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

I don't envy your job
I had a couple of people reach out to me about John W. Troxell's ribbon deletion the past week and I posted Talk:John W. Troxell my thoughts on the matter. I have to tell you that I don't envy the work you do as an admin. I've been editing for a long time and there were times that I thought about applying to be an admin. Be then I think back about some of my past edits and my personality, I probably would not have been a good admin, because I don't think I have the temperament and I get too attached to the work that I do. I think that there are way too many "guidelines" at times, but... in hind site, they are a necessary evil. Just wanted to say, keeping doing what you do, but please continue to do your best to not ruffle too many feather along the way. :) I think building a great working relationship with the wiki community is key part in making wiki viable research location. :) Neovu79 (talk) 15:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comments on Talk:John W. Troxell. I'd like to correct your mis-impression: I'm no admin, nor shall I ever be. "...please continue to do your best to not ruffle too many feather along the way." Too late. I have in the past been warned about being too hostile and I've since made efforts to be more reasonable. As you point out on the talk page, the ribbons Troxell wears are seen in the photo. I don't doubt the rack is correct but the Manual of Style doesn't seem to allow for those ribbon racks. I see them on many articles and I know that some editors find value in them. I would be happier if WP:MILHIST provided solid guidance on what would be allowed. But again, I appreciate your praise. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:02, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Signpost Congradulations
Congratulations on what appears to be a new gig for you! I'm sure you'll do great and I'm looking forward to it. I've never contributed to the Signpost and have terrible grammar, spelling, and typography; but as you and I have a relationship, I wanted to extend an offer to help out now and then if you need anyone with my skills (whatever they may be). All the best, Smmurphy(Talk) 16:46, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I assure you, the bar for entry at The Signpost isn't that high. All I'm doing is pressing buttons to publish The Signpost; I have no editorial role. I, like you, enjoy reading about Wikipedia's goings-on an I volunteered just to keep that happening. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:49, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I assure you, the bar for entry at The Signpost isn't that high. Wow, that hurts :)Eddie891 Talk Work 18:02, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Brigham D. Madsen
Brigham D. Madsen passes wp:PROF #1 w rgd Native Americans of the Western U.S. studies and #8 w rgd numerous books having been reviewed. Also there are many reliable sources w rgd Madsen's awards and accomplishments, per wp:GNG.--Hodgdon&#39;s secret garden (talk) 21:22, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 * You are incorrect. I really wish you would have spent time developing the article instead of just moving into the main namespace, especially after I asked you about it. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 21:28, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 * IMHO your knee-jerk nomination is emblematic of WP's problems, not a source of any solutions. As to your accusations w rgd WikiRealpolitik. Please provide a timeline of my wp:BOLDly creating the page after you asked about it. I believe your research will show your contention to be mistaken. Thankyou.--Hodgdon&#39;s secret garden (talk) 21:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I was unclear. I was watching you develop that article in sandbox and I waited patiently. When you moved it to mainspace, I stopped to ask you on your talk page why you thought the subject was notable, because I had already done a BEFORE search when you were still working on it. It would be my hope that, instead of writing articles about stuff you like, you would carefully consider WP:N, since you and I have had this interaction before. Further, since you habitually misunderstand WP:N, when I asked about it I would hope you'd consider that perhaps you were too quick to publish and we could have saved the trouble and moved the draft back into a sandbox. You defended your assertion which is why I have since sent it to AfD. Wikipedia is not a place for you to write your preferred narrative in defiance of community standards. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Look, this dude does have substantial pubs, unlike Park. Just because I believed/believe the original Park blp should have defaulted to keep, per my and another editors' arguments per wp:GNG, due to multiple not trivial discussion of his ideas in multiple sources...you're gonna follow me around Wikipedia arguing that awards from the UT state historcl soc., Westerners Int'l, Jn Whitmer historcl assoc. are schlock? pls get a life.--Hodgdon&#39;s secret garden (talk) 22:15, 28 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Friendly reminder - Ud sed: "When this AfD is over I'll consider taking the matter to ANI so you can start treating other editors fairly." It's over.  I appreciate ur identification with the culture and prejudices of encyclopedias' contributors and of the academy. E.g Here's a cool breakdown by U. of North Texas's George Yancey of "willingness of academic philosophers to hire [various groups]" (nuthin new here but still interesting IMHO)-->"I did this quick breakdown of some of the different groups and the willingness of academic philosophers  to hire them. Note that their unwillingness to hire them may be slight or may be strong. This is only the percentage that have an unwillingness to hire someone because they are a member of this group. I do not have the time right now to do a breakdown by being slightly, moderately or strongly more unwilling to hire from that group but do not want to overestimate the degree of rejection either.--- Dr. Yancey link"--Hodgdon&#39;s secret garden (talk) 05:20, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

I take it you aren't going to respond?
After my apology to you (which still stands) are you not willing to even talk to me or even accept my apology? I'm sorry for causing you so much psychological dissonance that you will not accept my apology. UserHerName (talk) 16:29, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I accept your apology. Please take no offense; I didn't think you needed a response. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:46, 6 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Cheers cool no problem. UserHerName (talk) 10:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:"Polish death camp" controversy
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:"Polish death camp" controversy. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ibn Battuta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berber ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ibn_Battuta check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ibn_Battuta?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:00, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Wikipe-tan, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''Per WP:OWN, Special:diff/840863249 is not an acceptable edit summary. No one editor’s “consent” is needed to change any page.'' — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 17:48, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The onus is on you. I'm pleased you chose to do this. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:53, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Your edit summary for the above was game on (diff). May I remind you that WP:Wikipedia is not a battleground. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 18:48, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The words "game on" might imply opposition, not battle, but I see what you're trying to claim. If you object to Wikipe-tan, just come out and say so. Being orthogonal and trying to shoe-horn some criticism into the page seems dishonest. We'll see if your RfC to nip at the edges in an attempt to counter perceived misogyny succeeds. I posit that admitting your biases upfront puts you in better stead that playing picayune games about policy while pretending objectivity. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:55, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Please note that WP:TALKNEW strongly discourages using editor names in talk page section headers. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 03:54, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I was unaware of that. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 14:47, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Germanic peoples
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Germanic peoples. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

German war effort arbitration case opened
You were recently listed as a party to or recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort/Evidence. Please add your evidence by May 30, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:01, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

I had the same thought
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jytdog&diff=prev&oldid=841916596 Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 23:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Theosophy (Blavatskian)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Theosophy (Blavatskian). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

"Evil Nazis"
Re This is the same thing Kecoffman is at ARBCOM at, making sure we can't talk about WWII flanking attacks or encirclements without reiterating that all Germans are Nazis and therefore evil" - thanks for the shout-out. It's good to know that my contributions are appreciated :-). --K.e.coffman (talk) 17:00, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Don't put a smiley face at the end of your comments, like you have above, if you took enough offense to list my comments as evidence at ARBCOM. ( pinged me and others that you have made claims against although we're not parties to this dispute.) Don't pretend friendliness and then accuse me. It shows how weak your case is when you make irrelevant complaints about half a dozen uninvolved editors so you can confuse the issue, and then have the gall to ask for more room to make further spurious claims. You're not being persecuted, K.e.coffman, and I don't think ARBCOM is going to buy it. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 15:47, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Gun use deletion
Thanks for the fix. I couldn't get it to work--RAF910 (talk) 20:25, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Fat Leonard
I requested page protection and it has been implemented, though briefly. Activist (talk) 09:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Checking in for May Signpost publication
Just checking in since I will be your backup if you aren't available to publish the May edition of The Signpost. Will you be around & able to publish on May 25-ish? ☆ Bri (talk) 04:13, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'm standing by to publish. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 14:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Every section is now marked "done". You'll probably get the signal from Kudpung soon. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Gun use essay comments - Second warning
Please tone down your comments about other users. Statements like this may be viewed as uncivil or even as a personal attack. I'm unaware of any editors who are advocating for the abolition of firearms, using the phrase scary black rifles in earnest or suggesting the use of primary source materials in these articles, it seems that you've made all of these things up. Perhaps I'm mistaken and you can provide diffs to back up these aspersions. Additionally, there is nothing preventing editors from focusing on the technical aspects of a firearm if they wish to do so and leaving the other details to others. I look forward to your Signpost write-up. –dlthewave ☎ 12:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Signpost
Hi Chris troutman, just a note for Signpost publication: a recent discussion approved SP notifications to the Watchlist_notices - feel free to drop an edit request at MediaWiki talk:Watchlist-messages as part of the "publication" process. — xaosflux  Talk 14:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:
 * WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags
 * Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:
 * A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons
 * There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy
 * Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English News Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.
 * Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
 * The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

MMS!
Do you realize you just spammed over a thousand editors with a duplicate delivery!? — xaosflux  Talk 15:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * See Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost. — xaosflux  Talk 15:41, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * No, I was not aware, although I can see what you mean. I only hit the button once. I'm not sure what went wrong. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 15:44, 24 May 2018 (UTC)


 * lowers pitchfork – TheGridExe  ( talk )  18:27, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

—  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 20:11, 24 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Can you please look into why this happened, and let me and Evad know. As far as and I know, this has never happened before, but of course a bug could be possible. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The duplication happened because Evad's script mass messages the content out but the instructions this morning were not clear about that. The other distribution methods (Twitter, Facebook, mailing list) were included in the same section, which is why I thought the script only moved the subpages. It has since been cleared up. I am still trying to find out why the global mass message was sent but not delivered. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Accidents happen Chris, No one is perfect and we're all bound to make mistakes at one time or another .... Just don't do it again! :) – Davey 2010 Talk 22:12, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Live and learn
You're doing fine as far as I'm concerned. If this stuff was easy, everybody would be doing it. The Signpost team sends thanks for taking the publishing task on. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:49, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

If you're going to expect a good working environment in the newsroom, you may need to consider not only watching what you're doing with the tools, but being more reserved with your criticisms of your Signpost colleagues. As far as I'm concerned, your first attempt to do anything for the publication 'failed' far worse than an op-ed that took a lot longer to put together than mashing buttons in the publishing script. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Let's step back and take a couple deep breaths. Chris, not the most diplomatic of moves there. While I doubt anyone would support self-censoring, it's also rather off-putting to receive criticism like that from a colleague you work with., no need to take a shot at Chris in return, especially over a mistake like this. Hell, I did far worse with publishing scripts. @Both, let's stay kind. The Signpost needs as many people as it can get. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:01, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

I've got a cleanup running now for you. If there is a "publish script" it might be good for it to file the edit request for watchlist notice too. — xaosflux  Talk 00:12, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

RfA criteria
Since I pinged you at WR:RFA, thought I should tell you that while it is significantly stricter than mine, I think your RfA criteria are actually the ones that closest match what will make a successful RfA and what the community as a whole's expectations are. Just reread them again now, and they are more or less the advice I give people who ask my thoughts. Anyway, wanted to let you know, because they are very valuable in terms of having something to point to as where the bar roughly is. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:58, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your kind words, as well as pointing me to that discussion. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:02, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

First Edit Day
Just wondering, which tool did you (or does the project) use to figure this out? Even I didn't realize! --JustBerry (talk) 23:36, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * had a year and a half ago. I used Navigation popups to see how long you've been editing: you can hover over a blue-linked user name to see that editor's registration date. You can, of course, also check an editor's contributions and look for the oldest. There are any number of frustrations and disappointments encountered while editing Wikipedia. The Birthday Committee, as part of WikiProject Editor Retention, seeks to remind editors like you that you're part of this community and we notice your longevity.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jabel Mukaber
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jabel Mukaber. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Gettysburg
Yes I should have cited it better--my old notes show I used a bunch of sources: Albanese,. "Requiem for Memorial Day: Dissent in the Redeemer Nation," American Quarterly, in JSTOR; Bellah,  "Civil Religion in America." Daedalus 1967 96(1): 1-21. online edition; Blight, "Decoration Day: The Origins of Memorial Day in North and South" in Alice Fahs and Joan Waugh, eds. The Memory of the Civil War in American Culture (2004), in Questia; pp 94-129;  Peter Karsten, "Encyclopedia of War and American Society; and Myers Robert J. "Memorial Day". Chapter 24 in Celebrations: The Complete Book of American Holidays. (1972). Rjensen (talk)
 * the 1913 bit -- I put it back with cite: G. Allan Yeomans, "A Southern Segregationist Goes to Gettysburg," Alabama Historical Quarterly (1972) 34#3 pp 194-205.  Rjensen (talk) 20:39, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Please STOP Redirecting XM Radio Channels!!
Listen here. It may be unsourced. But, I Don't Care.

I love those pages and I Wanna Keep it That Way.

Block Me All You Want, You have NOT Seen the LAST of Me.

NOW, STOP REDIRECTING XM RADIO CHANNELS FOR NOW!!! (And, that goes for Trivialist, too.)

Sincerely, 74.101.49.16 (talk) 27 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hm. Special:Contributions/74.101.49.16 and Special:Contributions/108.6.248.173 are WP:NOTHERE but not on the same range.  I guess I'll watch the pages in question and set them to pending changes.  Ian.thomson (talk) 21:32, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg None
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Al Ameer son • AliveFreeHappy • Cenarium • Lupo • MichaelBillington

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a successful request for comment, administrators are now able to add and remove editors to the "event coordinator" group. Users in the event coordinator group have the ability to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate limit. Users will no longer need to be in the "account creator" group if they are in the event coordinator group.
 * Following an AN discussion, all pages with content related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies, broadly construed, are now under indefinite general sanctions.

Technical news
 * IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in June. This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team will build granular types of blocks in 2018 (e.g. a block from uploading or editing specific pages, categories, or namespaces, as opposed to a full-site block). Feedback on the concept may be left at the talk page.
 * There is now a checkbox on Special:ListUsers to let you see only users in temporary user groups.
 * It is now easier for blocked mobile users to see why they were blocked.

Arbitration
 * A recent technical issue with the Arbitration Committee's spam filter inadvertently caused all messages sent to the committee through Wikipedia (i.e. Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee) to be discarded. If you attempted to send an email to the Arbitration Committee via Wikipedia between May 16 and May 31, your message was not received and you are encouraged to resend it. Messages sent outside of these dates or directly to the Arbitration Committee email address were not affected by this issue.

Miscellaneous
 * In early May, an unusually high level of failed login attempts was observed. The WMF has stated that this was an "external effort to gain unauthorized access to random accounts". Under Wikipedia policy, administrators are required to have strong passwords. To further reinforce security, administrators should also consider enabling two-factor authentication. A committed identity can be used to verify that you are the true account owner in the event that your account is compromised and/or you are unable to log in.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:59, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

This Month in Education: May 2018
<span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:60px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">This Month in Education <span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:20px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:900px;"> Volume 4 | Issue 5 | May 2018

<span style="font-weight:regular; text-align:center; font-size:14px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:1000px;">This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

<span style="color:white; font-size:24px; font-family:times new roman; display:block; background:#339966; width:1000px;">In This Issue

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 21:44, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

deletionism/inclusionism
why did you revert my edit and not at least retain the correction that there are specific pages for the two tribes? Speculatrix (talk)
 * My edit summary explained that MOS:SELFREF discourages articles in the main space from referring back to themselves as Wikipedia articles. That's why we use edit summaries. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:28, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pune
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pune. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Ichthus June 2018
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">

Project news By

Here are discussions relevant to the Project:
 * Liberty University has an RFC regarding the university's relationship with President Trump; see discussion
 * Is Genesis History? has an RFC regarding acceptability of movie reviews for inclusion; see discussion
 * United States pro-life movement has a requested move to United States anti-abortion movement; see discussion

The following articles need reviewers for GA-class: Type of Constans nom. by, Tian Feng (magazine) nom. by. Your assistance is greatly appreciated.

Stay up-to-date on the latest happenings at the Project

Did You Know Nominated by

... that in 1636, Phineas Hodson, Chancellor of York Minster, lost his 38-year-old wife Jane during the birth of the couple's 24th child?

Featured article Nominated by The Mortara case was a controversy precipitated by the Papal States' seizure of Edgardo Mortara, a six-year-old Jewish child, from his family in Bologna, Italy, in 1858. The city's inquisitor, Father Pier Feletti, heard from a servant that she had administered emergency baptism to the boy when he fell sick as an infant, and the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Roman and Universal Inquisition held that this made the child irrevocably a Catholic. Because the Papal States had forbidden the raising of Christians by members of other faiths, it was ordered that he be taken from his family and brought up by the Church. After visits from the child's father, international protests mounted, but Pope Pius IX would not be moved. The boy grew up as a Catholic with the Pope as a substitute father, trained for the priesthood in Rome until 1870, and was ordained in France three years later. In 1870 the Kingdom of Italy captured Rome during the unification of Italy, ending the pontifical state; opposition across Italy, Europe and the United States over Mortara's treatment may have contributed to its downfall.

- Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom • Unsubscribe here Delivered: 11:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Claude of France (1547–1575)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Claude of France (1547–1575). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Venezuelan deletion nominations
Hi! I started a discussion regarding the recent deletion nominations, I thought you might be interested in seeing it. Best wishes! --Jamez42 (talk) 18:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:1946 British Embassy bombing
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1946 British Embassy bombing. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive! Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
 * Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: NPPbarnstar SE.png. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: RR3217-0014 100 rubles USSR 1989 Gold avers.png, Swiss-Commemorative-Coin-1991-CHF-250-reverse.png, Coin of Kazakhstan 500Thinker averse.png, US-$1000-SC-1878-FR-346a-PROOF.jpg.
 * Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

New page reviewer granted
Hello Chris troutman. Your account has been added to the " " user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia; if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk. The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:04, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
 * Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
 * Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

A second opinion
Notwithstanding this near-farcical discussion, what's your take on the notability of Deepak Vinayak? Hard to segregate the notable stuff (if any) from the spam..... &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 06:06, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The subject was awarded the Medal of the Order of Australia just recently and now passes WP:ANYBIO. However, that discussion took place in May and at the time, the subject could only claim provincial Victoria awards, which are NN themselves. Being an Australia Day ambassador means nothing to me. The nominator should have made the case that many of the sources focused on the subject like this and this contain information provided by the subject via interview. While I myself have used interviews to help bring facts into biographic articles, it's questionable if the journalist involved fact-checked what the subject told them. I balk at attaching notability via a media source that used a short conversation they had with the subject just to fill inches. If you strip out sources that are mere mentions and have doubtful reliability, I wouldn't be so sure the subject passes GNG. There were only two !votes with policy basis, more or less arguing the subject passed GNG. When this discussion was still open I'd've probably !voted delete. The nominator screwed the pooch on this one. Hope that helps. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for your comprehensive assessment and I completely concur with it. &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 05:51, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Template use
Since your template requested I comment on your talk page if I have a response, I'll add, per [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sergecross73#A_page_you_started_(The_Lost_Child_(video_game))_has_been_reviewed! this conversation], that you please don't template the regulars about the GNG, especially about the redirect they created a year ago. Thanks. Sergecross73  msg me  03:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * That was my mistake, failing to notice that you only created the redirect. That's the cost of creating redirects. I've left a larger message on your talk page about your unhappiness. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:12, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 28
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 28, April – May 2018 <div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
 * # 1Bib1Ref
 * New partners
 * Rock's Backpages
 * Invaluable
 * Termsoup
 * User Group update
 * Global branches update
 * Wikipedia Library global coordinators' meeting
 * Spotlight: What are the ten most cited sources on Wikipedia? Let's ask the data
 * Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Gupta socking
Hello, my friend. Please be on the lookout for socking. I quite expect it. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:48, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

I smell a bit of a PAID sockfarm with this last entry here. I'm busy these next few days, so if this is your cup of tea, please dig. Otherwise, I certainly will. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:59, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Higi
Hi, I'm working on this article now. The subject has reliable sourcing. You may start an AFD if you wish. Andrevan@ 19:05, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * An alternative would be to make a disambiguation page. There are clearly sources in the article text. Andrevan@ 19:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I preach WP:REALPROBLEM, because I judge an article as a find it, even if you're still working on it. I'll check back at the end of the day. That there are sources does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Please be sure you make a case for notability. Writing an article about any business entity raises questions about WP:COI, so please make a declaration if required. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I have no COI with this entity. REALPROBLEM is an essay, not a policy. You may propose an AFD if you don't believe the company is notable, but I wouldn't have created the article if I didn't think it was notable. I've been editing Wikipedia since 2003. Andrevan@ 19:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Deleting John Carlo Villaruel
I edited and already found his journalism credentials online.

https://www.cebujournalism.org/cebu-working-press/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockmond2572 (talk • contribs) 22:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * It's not that I doubt he's a journalist; that doesn't matter. The point is that the subject isn't notable. You should have read what I posted on your talk page and on the article. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:14, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Oh I see. My bad. Noted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockmond2572 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mumbai
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mumbai. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

This Month in Education: June 2018
<span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:60px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">This Month in Education <span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:20px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:900px;"> Volume 4 | Issue 6 | June 2018

<span style="font-weight:regular; text-align:center; font-size:14px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:1000px;">This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

<span style="color:white; font-size:24px; font-family:times new roman; display:block; background:#339966; width:1000px;">In This Issue

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 06:03, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost
Thank you  again  for putting the press in  motion. Let's hope the script can be sorted out  making  it  less arduous for you  on  future issues which  may  have even more pages to  move.. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:53, 30 June 2018 (UTC).
 * While we could submit a Phabricator ticket to increase the limit by one, we could see about limiting content to 16 items. To that end, as I'm responsible for publishing, might The Signpost return to publishing every two weeks, so content can be more recent while not overloading each issue? Don't get me wrong, I like the monthly magazine. Because this is a technical limit, one wonders if we could do a half issue mid-month to run the traffic report and a couple other items so the monthly book can stay under 16. We're also re-publishing content (like the blog) from elsewhere, so perhaps that could be cut if it takes us over the limit. I love the script. I'm not a fan of the manual process. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 14:02, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you
Your work in getting the Signpost out and published is greatly appreciated - it is a skill set I don't possess. I've taken a job far away from Pittsburgh and will miss our 'real life' interactions. Best Regards, Barbara ✐ ✉  16:59, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Regarding deletion of Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India
Hello, Of course, I was not aware of the copyright issues in Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India. Would you like to get a draft of the same to enable me to address the issues and resubmit it. I think I deserve an opportunity to mend it. Hpsatapathy (talk) 04:43, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 July newsletter
The third round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:


 * Courcelles, a first time contestant, with 1756 points, a tally built largely on 27 GAs related to the Olympics
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three GAs on natural history and astronomy topics
 * SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with a variety of submissions related to transport in the state of Washington

Contestants managed 7 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 120 good articles, 1 good topic, 124 DYK entries, 15 ITN entries, and 132 good article reviews. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 458 GA reviews, in comparison to 244 good articles submitted for review and promoted. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process; several submissions, particularly in abstruse or technical areas, have needed additional work to make them completely verifiable.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk), Vanamonde (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Deleting Art cycling in Millstatt
Hi Chris. You proposed the page Art cycling in Millstatt for deletion with the very general argument that "it not meets our criteria for inclusion". You did not specificate, why it does not meet the criteria for inclusion in the English wikipedia. Where, by the way, can somebody find any criteria for inclusion of art events (NOT galleries, NOT artists, NOT festivals) in the English version of wikipedia? The event met the criteria for inclusion in the German, the Italian, and the Slovenian wikipedia. Are significant events of art in Central European countries generally not meeting the criteria for inclusion in the English wikipedia, and only events in the U.S. or in the U.K. or in other English speaking countries like Australia or New Zealand can meet these criteria? I do not think so.

I think that Art cycling in Millstatt meets any conceivable criteria for significant art events, and that some criteria for (not really comparable) music festivals (like number of people attending) or art galleries (like number of exhibitions and represented artists) cannot be used.

So please explain exactly, WHICH criteria (and WHERE are these criteria documented) are not met, WHY you think such criteria are applicable, and WHY you think these criteria are not met. Leontari1 (talk) 00:45, 1 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I just read (on the page Art cycling in Millstatt) your main deletion argument, that the page looks like a promotion piece, and that too few independant sources are cited. Ok, regarding this impression you are not completely wrong. I took notice of the event at a rather early stage, and therefore independent sources were rather scarce when editing the page. Now many independant sources discussing and commenting this important art event in Austria are available, and I will include these sources in an update of the page.Leontari1 (talk) 01:25, 1 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I have removed the "proposed deletion tag" from Art cycling in Millstatt, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. I tried to improve the page by adding independent sources and removing text sounding "promotional". Further arguments regarding notability can be found on the talk page Talk:Art cycling in Millstatt. If you still think this article should be deleted, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks!Leontari1 (talk) 09:33, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Talkback
Regarding your recent prod of the Ahvaz derby article. North America1000 22:06, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Ichthus: July 2018
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">

The Top 7 report By

The big news was the marriage of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. The Top 7 most popular articles in WikiProject Christianity were: <ol style="margin-left: -2.0em;"> </ol>
 * 1) Elizabeth I of England – legendary monarch who ushered in the Elizabethan Era over the dead body of her half-sister (#5)
 * 2) Henry VIII of England – on his deathbed the last words of the king who founded the English Reformation were "Monks! Monks! Monks!"
 * 3) Martin Luther King Jr. – can't wait to see the new US$5 bill featuring the "I Have a Dream" speech
 * 4) Seven deadly sins – surprisingly "original research" is not one of the Seven deadly sins
 * 5) Mary, Queen of Scots – arrested for Reigning While Catholic (RWC)
 * 6) Michael Curry (bishop) – our article says that he upstaged Meghan at her wedding. Did you see her wedding pictures? All I can say is
 * 7) Robert F. Kennedy – when informed that missiles were being installed in Cuba he famously quipped, "Can they hit Oxford, Mississippi?"

Did you know Nominated by

... that the little-known 1758 Methodist hymn "Sun of Unclouded Righteousness" asks God to send the doctrine of the "Unitarian fiend ... back to hell", referring to both Islam and Unitarianism?

Our newest Featured list Nominated by List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events. Predictions of apocalyptic events that would result in the extinction of humanity, a collapse of civilization, or the destruction of the planet have been made since at least the beginning of the Christian Era. Most predictions are related to Abrahamic religions, often standing for or similar to the eschatological events described in their scriptures. Christian predictions typically refer to events like the Rapture, Great Tribulation, Last Judgment, and the Second Coming of Christ.

Polls conducted in 2012 across 20 countries found over 14% of people believe the world will end in their lifetime, with percentages raging from 6% of people in France to 22% in the US and Turkey. In the UK in 2015, the general public believed the likeliest cause would be nuclear war, while experts thought it would be artificial intelligence. Between one and three percent of people from both countries thought the apocalypse would be caused by zombies or alien invasion. (more...)

Help wanted

We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project that you'd like to highlight? An issue that you'd like to bring to light? Post your inquiries or submission here.

- Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom • Unsubscribe here Delivered: 06:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Pbsouthwood • TheSandDoctor
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Gogo Dodo
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Andrevan • Doug • EVula • KaisaL • Tony Fox • WilyD

Bureaucrat changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Andrevan • EVula

Guideline and policy news
 * An RfC about the deletion of drafts closed with a consensus to change the wording of WP:NMFD. Specifically, a draft that has been repeatedly resubmitted and declined at AfC without any substantial improvement may be deleted at MfD if consensus determines that it is unlikely to ever meet the requirements for mainspace and it otherwise meets one of the reasons for deletion outlined in the deletion policy.
 * A request for comment closed with a consensus that the promising draft template cannot be used to indefinitely prevent a WP:G13 speedy deletion nomination.

Technical news
 * Starting on July 9, the WMF Security team, Trust & Safety, and the broader technical community will be seeking input on an upcoming change that will restrict editing of site-wide JavaScript and CSS to a new technical administrators user group. Bureaucrats and stewards will be able to grant this right per a community-defined process. The intention is to reduce the number of accounts who can edit frontend code to those who actually need to, which in turn lessens the risk of malicious code being added that compromises the security and privacy of everyone who accesses Wikipedia. For more information, please review the FAQ.
 * Syntax highlighting has been graduated from a Beta feature on the English Wikipedia. To enable this feature, click the highlighter icon (Codemirror-icon.png) in your editing toolbar (or under the hamburger menu in the 2017 wikitext editor). This feature can help prevent you from making mistakes when editing complex templates.
 * IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in July (previously scheduled for June). This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.

Miscellaneous
 * Currently around 20% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 17% a year ago. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless if you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Please run for adminship
Please run for adminship: MILHIST HELP_WANTED You'd be good at it. Once you have the tools, you will find all kinds of things you can correct and/or assist with. All those little things you now have to ask an Admin to help with, you will be able to do yourself. And I already know you have the knowledge MILHIST needs. So, please, go for it. — Maile (talk) 23:28, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Żegota
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Żegota. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

List_of_anti-corruption_activists_in_Ghana
Hi User:Chris troutman: Clearly this article and that one need some work, but I don't think tagging new editors' work for deletion is a good solution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masssly (talk • contribs) 00:25, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I disagree. New editors do not merit new articles of their own to write. Contributions must meet our policies, guidelines, and essays. Please read WP:LSC and WP:LISTN. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:45, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Regarding Proposed deletion of Vienna Residence Orchestra
Dear Chris, thanks for your message.

This article should not serve for promotional purpose but simply provide information about a traditional classical orchestra in vienna. I now cut it down to the very basic information and tried to solve the issues highlighted on top of page. I would very much appreciate your help/recheck if the issues are solved. Thank you very much in advance! --Kirstenohst (talk) 09:45, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The subjects of articles have to be notable. The VRO fails our guideline about organizations, as well as our guideline about musical groups and our general notability guideline. You should not have removed my proposed deletion, so I've nominated it for deletion, formally. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 01:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC)



Dear Chris, thank you very much. Just to clarify it - I removed the message for proposed deletion as you wrote:

"If you don't want the article deleted:   1.) edit the page    2.) remove the text that looks like this:      3.) save the page"

obviously I got you wrong, sorry. However feel free to do what ever is necessary. :-)

Best regards, Kirsten--Kirstenohst (talk) 08:56, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of military occupations
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of military occupations. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stateless nation
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stateless nation. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Meetups #87, #88, #89, #90
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:No original research
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:No original research. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Adolf Hitler
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Adolf Hitler. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers. Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
 * June backlog drive


 * New technology, new rules
 * New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
 * Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
 * Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.


 * Editathons
 * Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The Signpost
 * The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

This Month in Education: July 2018
<span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:60px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">This Month in Education <span style="font-weight:bold; color:#006699; font-size:20px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:900px;"> Volume 4 | Issue 7 | July 2018

<span style="font-weight:regular; text-align:center; font-size:14px; font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; display:block; width:1000px;">This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

<span style="color:white; font-size:24px; font-family:times new roman; display:block; background:#339966; width:1000px;">In This Issue

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 06:32, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Publishing Signpost
Hi Chris, just checking in to see that you will be OK publishing The Signpost. Our target is between 48 and 72 hours away; I think one or two sections are still being composed and checked. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:38, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Yup, I've been watching the dialogue at the newsroom; standing by, accordingly. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 14:29, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Awesome, thanks for the upcoming assist. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:56, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * As far as I'm concerned, we're ready to go, unless has noticed som last minute snags - he's better at layout than I am but he's not around to check my op-ed..Please do a print proof before running the distribution script. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Nøkkenbuer has formatted the op-ed, and the Christmas tree is 100% green. I think everything is ready. Let's release the clutch. In other words, publish when you see this, Chris; steer straight and don't forget to pop the chute. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:03, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Published; masssmessages went out locally and globally; notification out on Gmail and Twitter, too. I look forward to reading it. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Chris. I don't do Facebook; is there a notification there, as well? ☆ Bri (talk) 00:50, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Chris. We really  ought  to  thank  for  all  his work  copy editing  these issues. Perhaps he should be part of the team. He has a truly excellent  eye for  detail. His work is indispensable. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:02, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the appreciation, . I don't mind contributing in an unofficial capacity, so long as that is acceptable, but my immediate concern with being "part of the team" is that I am frankly too unreliable an editor. My interests and activities tend to change frequently, as does my editing schedule, so I wouldn't want anyone at The Signpost to be filled with a false sense of confidence that I will be active and available for each issue. How much longer until I wend and wander my way away? Anyway, attribution in the history pages is already more than I prefer; I don't need any more than that. Of course, the decision is up to you and the rest. I'll continue to contribute however best I think I can, regardless of where and whether I am in the team. —Nøkkenbuer (talk • contribs) 17:09, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:George Galloway
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Galloway. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Sro23
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg KaisaL • Ymblanter

Guideline and policy news
 * After a discussion at Meta, a new user group called "interface administrators" (formerly "technical administrator") has been created. Come the end of August, interface admins will be the only users able to edit site-wide JavaScript and CSS pages like MediaWiki:Common.js and MediaWiki:Common.css, or edit other user's personal JavaScript and CSS. The intention is to improve security and privacy by reducing the number of accounts which could be used to compromise the site or another user's account through malicious code. The new user group can be assigned and revoked by bureaucrats. Discussion is ongoing to establish details for implementing the group on the English Wikipedia.
 * Following a request for comment, the WP:SISTER style guideline now states that in the mainspace, interwiki links to Wikinews should only be made as per the external links guideline. This generally means that within the body of an article, you should not link to Wikinews about a particular event that is only a part of the larger topic. Wikinews links in "external links" sections can be used where helpful, but not automatically if an equivalent article from a reliable news outlet could be linked in the same manner.

Technical news
 * The WMF Anti-Harassment Tools team is seeking input on the second set of wireframes for the Special:Block redesign that will introduce partial blocks. The new functionality will allow you to block a user from editing a specific set of pages, pages in a category, a namespace, and for specific actions such as moving pages and uploading files.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Albert Cashier
You have previously participated in discussions about the use of gendered pronouns in the biography of Albert Cashier. An Rfc about this topic is taking place at Talk:Albert Cashier, and your comments are welcome. Mathglot (talk) 18:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort closed
An arbitration case regarding German war effort articles has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

For the Arbitration Committee,
 * 1) For engaging in harassment of other users, is indefinitely banned from the English Wikipedia under any account.
 * 2) is topic banned from the history of Germany from 1932 to 1945, broadly construed. This topic ban may be appealed after six months have elapsed and every six months thereafter.
 * 3) is reminded that project coordinators have no special roles in a content dispute, and that featured articles are not immune to sourcing problems.
 * 4) Editors are reminded that consensus-building is key to the purpose and development of Wikipedia. The most reliable sources should be used instead of questionable sourcing whenever possible, especially when dealing with sensitive topics. Long-term disagreement over local consensus in a topic area should be resolved through soliciting comments from the wider community, instead of being re-litigated persistently at the local level.
 * 5) While certain specific user-conduct issues have been identified in this decision, for the most part the underlying issue is a content dispute as to how, for example, the military records of World War II-era German military officers can be presented to the same extent as military records of officers from other periods, while placing their records and actions in the appropriate overall historical context. For better or worse, the Arbitration Committee is neither authorized nor qualified to resolve this content dispute, beyond enforcing general precepts such as those requiring reliable sourcing, due weighting, and avoidance of personal attacks. Nor does Wikipedia have any other editorial body authorized to dictate precisely how the articles should read outside the ordinary editing process. Knowledgeable editors who have not previously been involved in these disputes are urged to participate in helping to resolve them. Further instances of uncollegial behavior in this topic-area will not be tolerated and, if this occurs, may result in this Committee's accepting a request for clarification and amendment to consider imposition of further remedies, including topic-bans or discretionary sanctions.
 * -Cameron11598(Talk) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Joseph Tabenkin
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joseph Tabenkin. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 14 August 2018 (UTC)