User talk:Chrisasoee

Speedy deletion of THE UNIVERSAL STANDARD BOOK CODE (USBC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Plrk (talk) 07:41, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above was a bit cruel. But you do definitely need to establish why the Universal Standard Book Code is notable when it gets so few Google hits. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 07:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Can you explain what you are trying to do and perhaps I can help you?


 * I see that you have recreated a deleted page that is a copy of Universal Standard Book Code. It is unclear what you are attempting here. Regards LittleOldMe (talk) 11:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I found THE UNIVERSAL STANDARD BOOK CODE (USBC) tagged as test page, but preferred to restore the original redirect after page move to Universal Standard Book Code since deleting the redirect it seems to have confused the original creator and prompted its recreation. So we can now concentrate on the content that hasn't been deleted, but renamed to Universal Standard Book Code.--Tikiwont (talk) 11:52, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I have deleted the SHOUTING title again. Do I need to protect it to force you to work on Universal Standard Book Code? -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 14:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Universal Standard Book Code has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  MBisanz  talk 08:11, 23 May 2008 (UTC)