User talk:Chrisburke123

Welcome!
Hello, Chrisburke123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Red Director (talk) 01:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions Notification - American Politics
power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 02:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:41, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Stoneman Douglas High School shooting, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop labelling substantive changes as 'typo' fixes. Dawn Bard (talk) 23:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 10:46, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 10:47, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Antifa (United States). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  N0nsensical.system (err0r?) 10:52, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

June 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Antifa (United States). Doug Weller talk 10:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

General sanctions alert
Doug Weller talk 10:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 19:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Topic ban warning
Please stop your disruptive editing or you will be topic banned from American politics. Wikipedia goes by reliable sources, and you don't get to remove well-sourced information, or twist what it says, just because it's biased in your opinion. You have to find reliable sources that share that opinion first. Just one example: "The organization glorifies violence in self-defense", besides sounding ridiculous, has no similarity to what any of the sources say. Bishonen &#124; tålk 15:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC).
 * howdy! This user is continuing.--Jorm (talk) 19:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Very well. Shall I list the core beliefs from the organization's own website or biased news sources that you have listed? Chrisburke123 (talk) 20:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

How can a news source that is accusing the group of supposed racism be considered a reliable source when the chairman of the organization is a black man from Cuba? Chrisburke123 (talk) 20:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

This website has become a joke. I have been a contributor since 2014 and have viewed just how biased this website has become. Please ban me or I will continue making edits Chrisburke123 (talk) 20:39, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Are you sure you wish to be blocked? I believe, based on your comments elsewhere, you no longer wish to be blocked. --Yamla (talk) 20:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

I will wait on a response from the administrator that banned me to see if I can make edits after a time, but as politics are my primary interest on Wikipedia, I have become very dishearted with the website and its structure. Chrisburke123 (talk) 20:57, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay. Good luck! :) --Yamla (talk) 20:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Ban changed
Hi again, Chrisburke123. Having slept on it, I've changed my mind, and decided a full ban from American politics was overly draconian, since the problems were all about a single article. I'm withdrawing the ban above, and instead banning you indefinitely from Proud Boys and all discussions and mentions of that subject. You're free to edit the rest of American politics. But please note that if you run into similar problems (especially sourcing problems), the full ban is likely to be reinstated. Bishonen &#124; tålk 09:12, 2 September 2020 (UTC).

February 2022
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Battle of Montgisard. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 08:52, 27 February 2022 (UTC)