User talk:Chriscoll 2004

June 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — m  o  n  o  23:47, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Badge2.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Badge2.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Eeekster (talk) 23:57, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Multiple reverts
Hi Chriscoll 2004, I've reverted some of your edits: In addition, I found quite strange coordinate updates by you (for Falcarragh and Letterkenny). In both cases, you increased the last digit of the west coordinate without providing any explanation. Neither change is helpful as towns and villages cover larger areas and minimal coordinate changes keep the position still within that area.
 * In Gola Island and Croftfoot you inserted an apostrophe where a number was used in its plural form (see here and here). While both variants are correct, the variant without apostrophes finds wider acceptance, see here.
 * In Donegal, you changed the Irish name from Dún na nGall to Dún Na nGall, i.e. you changed the Irish article for the genitive plural from an to An which is incorrect (the English meaning of this name is fort of the foreigners).
 * In Donegal Celtic F.C., you updated the seating capacity of the ground from 4,200 to 4,210. This update appeared to be random as no reference was given. When I checked the official site of the club, the seating capacity turned out to be 3,000.

Please work constructively as you did with this edit. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 08:43, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Glasgow Rosses, you may be blocked from editing. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 14:35, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Glasgow rosses
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Glasgow rosses, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  11:09, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Glasgow rosses, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  11:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Just to add to the above: "Goals Park"? Aye, richt. Stop it. TFOWR 11:20, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Badge3.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Badge3.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 14:29, 9 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:29, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tir Conaill Harps Badge 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tir Conaill Harps Badge 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tír Conaill Harps. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:25, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Can you please explain why this keeps being reverted? I am public relation officer of Tir Conaill Harps and have been involved with the club since it was formed back in 1994. All information on my edits and factual and 100% accurate. The unconstructive and disruptive edits seem to be coming from yourself as information on the current page is factually incorrect and sources that are also incorrect and unreliable. How you would know this given that you know nothing about the club baffles me. If you have any specific concerns around the information on the page please let me know, but please refrain from tampering with information on the page that you know nothing about, and then leaving not helpful comments such as "that's not good--not good writing, promotional spam linking". This helps noone.
 * Kind regards Chris Chriscoll 2004 (talk) 13:14, 25 October 2022 (UTC)