User talk:Chrisf989

Chrisf989 (talk) 15:49, 21 January 2013

Welcome
New book being written for publication later in 2013, relates to a Surrey family living with the Autistic Spectrum Disorder for the last 18 years.

There is so much more to Autism than anyone really believes. It is a complex set of difficulties that makes the brain manipulate and store data in an often irrational manner. This results in the sufferer encountering huge difficulties in dealing with simple tasks we all take for granted.

Any publishers out there who are looking for a subject which is becoming more common, and want to publish a book about a true life account, then please email the author.

Welcome to Wikipedia, Chrisf989! Thank you for your contributions. I am MJ94 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! MJ94 (talk) 08:30, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Autistic Spectrum Disorder

There is so much more to Autism than anyone really believes. It is a complex set of difficulties that makes the brain manipulate and store data in an often irrational manner. This results in the sufferer encountering huge difficulties in dealing with simple tasks we all take for granted.

Any publishers out there who are looking for a subject which is becoming more common, and want to publish a book about a true life account, then please email the author.

Chrisf989 (talk) 16:44, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Black Swan Famed for its Beauty.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Black_Swan_Famed_for_it%27s_Beauty.jpg, If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 08:42, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 86.161.86.204 (talk) 16:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC) 86.161.86.204 (talk) 17:21, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Suggestion
I don't like to do this because you were obviously acting in good faith, but categories are strictly "indexes" on Wikipedia, so all the stuff you'd put in wasn't really appropriate. In fact you might be better off with a blog - Wikipedia isn't really the place to be talking about a book you're writing or indeed soliciting publishers, and if people feel that's why you're here then your account will get closed down pretty quickly. We're here to make an encyclopedia, full stop. I'm sure you have access to resources that could contribute to improving the articles on autism - might I suggest you head over to WikiProject Neuroscience and talk to them about what you could bring to Wikipedia? In the meantime I've put the text I cut out of the category header onto your User page, it seemed the least inappropriate place for it on Wikipedia, and I figured you might want it. Cheers. Le Deluge (talk) 01:58, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * pointsadeandtaken,but why delete the picture????Chrisf989 (talk) 16:03, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Because category pages are meant to be simple navigation aids, with no frills - it's a bit like leaving a painting in the card index of a traditional library, it's just out of place. Trust me, it's nothing personal, that's just a style thing that the Wikipedia community has decided on a long time ago. I'm not "messing" with anything just out of spite or anything like that - try reading WP:CATEGORY for more background on what the category system is meant for. Cheers. Le Deluge (talk) 16:34, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, I'm TBrandley. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Category:Autism in Young Adults without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, TBrandley (what's up) 16:43, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The information was removed by user Deluge without any particular reason why, other than he obviously dissaproved of it being there in the first place. He should have asked me first.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.161.86.204 (talk) 16:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 2 things - the reason why was that you were trying to use a category page as some kind of article, where the point of the page was the fixed text rather than the articles in the category. That's just not what categories about - as Categories are different from articles says "categories are ideally streamlined indexes that can point readers to the discussions they want". There was nothing streamlined about the page you had created. Trust me, it wasn't a personal thing as you keep insinuating, just the action of someone who has been on Wikipedia a long time and knows how these things work. To be honest I thought I was being pretty nice to you, taking the time to save the content for your user page and giving you some pointers on how things worked, a lot of people would have just blanked the category page with no explanation. ::Second point - Wikipedia is a collaborative thing, pages don't belong to anyone so it was not "your" page and noone has to ask permission to edit it. Have a read of Ownership of articles - "Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone". The only bits of Wikipedia that are "yours" to do what you like with are this page and your user page, User:Chrisf989. I'll be honest, it did feel a bit weird editing another man's user page, but it was the best place for such personal content and I won't touch it again. PS The convention on Wikipedia is always to bottom-post. Le Deluge (talk) 18:19, 26 January 2013 (UTC)