User talk:Chrish162

In response to your feedback
You are so right, and although you seem to be doing very fine, I'll just link you to this to provide a little help.

Lectonar (talk) 15:39, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Chrish162! Thank you for your contributions. I am Charlesdrakew and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Charles (talk) 18:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Shearonink (talk) 01:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello and thank you for your time. Whilst I can understand why YouTube sources may not be considered "reliable," I have to wonder if the content of the article should make allowances- for example the page shows statistics on her YouTube page, which is easily proven by visiting said YouTube page, and some of the YouTube sources are recordings of shows that aired on television, etc. Also, other YouTube personalities and comics have articles written about them, and undoubtedly the majority of the references used are YouTube videos (see Shane Dawson, Fred Figglehorn, among others).

I also have to wonder about double standards being enforced- by searching randomly I can find pages like this (and scores of others): Kristen Johnston which are not "adequately supported." Similarly, another concern that was brought up is that biographical information needed to be extensively researched. I cited multiple videos where the person the article is about spoke about their life and career beginnings. While that is not necessarily "independent," it's like an autobiography in my mind, but I guess if that causes a problem it could be omitted from the article until "proper" sources are gathered?

What are your thoughts on this? Chrish162 (talk) 02:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GloZell Green concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GloZell Green, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission GloZell Green


Hello Chrish162. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled GloZell Green.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:02, 15 November 2013 (UTC)