User talk:Chrisieboy/Archive 6

Flag carrier
Hello. In my opinion, the last column is completely irrelevant to the article. We can take this discussion to WP:AIRLINES to get some extra opinions. What do you think?--Jetstreamer (talk) 16:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm happy for you to delete the column if you like, but while it exists I do think the Italian entry should stand. Chrisieboy (talk) 16:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Could you please post your opinion here? Thanks!--Jetstreamer (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited East Cambridgeshire local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ely (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Parr's Bank
Hello,

I am proposing a major extension of the stub on Parr's Bank, based on the Gregory history. This cannot be done without losing your contribution. Do you mind? You can look at Bank of Liverpool to see the one I did last.

Regards Bebington (talk) 10:00, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * No problem at all. Chrisieboy (talk) 23:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

District Bank now completed. I am looking at Williams & Glyns and I see your name appearing regularly. There is an article on Williams & Glyns containing separate sections on William Deacons and Glyn Mills. Then there are separate articles on Williams Deacons and on Glyn Mills. None are particulalry detailed and the text largely overlaps. I thought of expanding the Williams and Glyns article and then suggesting that the other sites act merely as redirects. Do you know of anyone who takes an overview of these things.

Regards

Bebington (talk) 10:58, 7 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Ordinarily, you should seek consensus on the appropriate talk page, but I don't think the changes you are suggesting are contentious. Go for it. Chrisieboy (talk) 01:23, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

I agree with you in principle. However, I tried using the talk page for Grindlays, District Bank, Bank of Liverpool and Martins Bank and there was not one single response. When I was doing construction company histories an administrator took an interest in proposed structural changes but nothing seems to have popped up for the banks.

Regards

Bebington (talk) 11:03, 8 December 2012 (UTC)