User talk:Chrisjames247

ChrisJames247

August 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Manchurian Black Water Snake has been reverted. Your edit here to Manchurian Black Water Snake was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/groups/manchurian/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:26, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

No nutshells on articles
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please note that the template Nutshell should not be placed on articles: the title alone often adequately denotes what the article is about, and when multiple subjects share the same or similar name, distinguish or other uses might be appropriate. The lead or intro (the text above the table of contents) is the place where an article is summarized. If you have any questions, please ask on my talk page, and please see the resources at WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles (talk). Cheers! --Animalparty! (talk) 01:46, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Corn snake/Red rat snake
Hi there seems to be an issue with the naming of the corn snake/red rat snake article. You claim that the latter is the more common name and that it should thus be the name of the article. I don't have an opinion on that, and either would be fine with me. However, the way to go about that is NOT to kill the article you think has the wrong name, then turn it into a redirect to very much shorter and less well-developed article you newly wrote. I suppose there can not really be any discussion about which of the two articles is better developed at the moment. At the same time, we can not have two different articles on synonyms of the same thing. Hence, IF your argument about which name is more common was accepted, the standard way to go about this would be to MOVE (i.e. rename) the cornsnake article to "Red rat snake" and make a new redirect for "Corn snake". Whatever additional material is now in Red rat snake should then be added into the former Corn snake.

However, I strongly suggest you discuss such an action beforehand. Seeing as no one has brought up this name matter before, I doubt it's as clear-cut as you think, and some discussion should happen. I suggest you open a topic on Talk:Corn_snake, get consensus on the renaming, THEN go ahead with it. Please don't try to axe the current Corn snake again; that's just pointless removal of a lot of good material.-- Elmidae  14:52, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Ok. Well I am not wasting my time writing articles up if you are just going to remove them. Feel free to divert Red Rat Snake back to Corn Snake I have other projects I can work on. Chrisjames247 (talk) 01:07, 28 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Wouldn't you say you are wasting your time duplicating information that is already present in another article on the same subject? How about you just add any new material to Corn snake? I am going to implement that redirect now, but feel free to start a discussion on renaming/moving to "Red rat snake". If that usage is as universal as you claim, you should be able to get consensus.-- Elmidae  07:28, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool
Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz

Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation

Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Natrix Natrix Helvetica, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. The page as been redirected to the page at Grass snake. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   00:59, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi there, I'd appreciate it if you took a moment to read WP:NOTESSAY. The article in its current form doesn't meet this guideline. Feel free to respond to me here or on my talk page regarding your intentions. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   01:22, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I've moved your page to save it from deletion as it's obvious that you're making a good-faith effort to contribute to Wikipedia, which is very much appreciated. You can now edit the page here User:Chrisjames247/Natrix Natrix Helvetica and take as much time as you need to get it just right. I'd highly recommend reading Your first article and going through the Articles for Creation process after you're finished writing. Just remember that Wikipedia is a place for encyclopedic articles, not how-tos or essays. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know! -- Non-Dropframe   talk   01:51, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Chrisjames247/Natrix Natrix Helvetica


A tag has been placed on User:Chrisjames247/Natrix Natrix Helvetica requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.reptileforums.co.uk/forums/snakes/713434-grass-snake-natrix-natrix-care.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 14:44, 8 April 2016 (UTC)