User talk:Chrisjohnagee

Welcome!
Hello, Chrisjohnagee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 19:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Your recent editing history at Alternative media (U.S. political left) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bishonen &#124; tålk 19:32, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note, you can't avoid being sanctioned for edit warring by editing logged out. Please use the talkpage. Bishonen &#124; tålk 19:34, 7 May 2022 (UTC).

Hi,

This is my first time editing a wikipedia page. No offense intended. I did not know I was not logged in.

But please check out our website and archives history. You will find we are definitely an excellent alternative media outlet with a long and venerable history.

CovertActionMagazine.com

Feel free to share your feedback.

Best,

Chris chris.agee@icloud.com 68.132.88.30 (talk) 19:47, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Chrisjohnagee, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was CovertAction Magazine, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Best practices for editors with close associations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! RegentsPark (comment) 20:17, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * tl;dr version of the above notice: you shouldn't directly edit an article where you have a conflict of interest. Instead, use the talk page to suggest edits (don't forget to provide reliable sources) and someone will make the edit for you. --RegentsPark (comment) 20:37, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

CovertAction Magazine: COI, edit-warring, and verifiability
Chris,

I saw your comment at Doug Weller's talkpage, noticed that you have been recently making edits related to CovertAction Magazine, and wanted to drop you a few notes about relevant wikipedia policies:
 * Firstly, if have an association with the magazine in real life (which seems likely given your exclusive focus), please see the message from above regarding conflict of interest and instead of editing the related articles themselves, post on their respective talkpages (1) declaring your potential CoI, and (2) requesting that the changes you propose be reviewed and implemented by independent editors.
 * Irrespective of CoI, if your edit is disputed or reverted, it is not ok to repeatedly redo that edit as you did at Alternative media (U.S. political left); also logging out to make a disputed edit is treated as sockpuppetry, and can lead to sanctions. Instead, again, discuss your change on the article talkpage while presenting sources that support it.
 * Speaking of sources: wikipedia typically relies on secondary, reliable sources that are independent of the subject. So CovertAction Magazine's "website and archives history" is not necessarily a good source for, say, listing it at Alternative media (U.S. political left). In this case you could have cited on the article talkpage to see if the other editor(s) agree to its reliability and relevance.

I realize that the above is a lot to absorb. So for now, you can start with disclosing any CoI and slowing down to avoid disruption. Abecedare (talk) 20:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I just noticed that you already say on your userpage that you are the "editor of the newly relaunched CovertAction Magazine." Given that, RegentsPark concise advice is the most relevant one to follow. Abecedare (talk) 21:17, 7 May 2022 (UTC)