User talk:Chrisjwmartin

Chris, are you the real Chris Martin from Coldplay?? --Biohazard 10:54, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Sadly, no! I am merely a philosopher and writer. --Chris Martin 16:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Chris, the "other real Chris Martin" (former World Champion of Diplomacy and multiple-time North American Champion of Diplomacy) is just a dance instructor. I came to your talk page seeing if you were him since you edited the Diplomacy_(game) article. --Barno 18:55, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Ha, yes, I know - it always excites people when I turn up to Dip Cons. And then they see it's just little me after all. --Chris Martin 16:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

I take it you're a Radiohead fan! Regular exercise at the gym (3 days a week)... --Starla Dear 00:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)


 * It's true, both ways: I am a Radiohead fan; I am fitter, happier and more productive. What drew you to my User Page? --Chris Martin 16:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I was on Chris Martin's discussion page, saw your user name and had to check it out! As for the userboxes, I don't think you can get them any more through the Wikipedia page that told you how to get pre-made ones and how to make your own, but if you hit 'edit page' on someone's user page you can see the html required for the box.  I generally look around for ones I like and see what you need to type to make them.
 * Here is one that you might like.
 * --Starla Dear 01:51, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * --Starla Dear 01:51, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Re: My User Page
Hi, sorry for the lateness of my reply. I was on a wikibreak. No problem! Always happy to fix a fellow wikipedian's page. To answer your question, I noticed the vandlism on recent changes patrol. Happy wiki'ing! --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 15:14, 11 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Ta! --Chris Martin 16:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Chris Martin
Marvellous chap.


 * Why, thank you. Chris Martin 16:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Stephen Colbert
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Hnsampat 15:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Muahahaha! Chris Martin 11:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Albigensian Crusade
I'm contacting you out of courtesy as you have contributed to the page and may wish to supply your own citations. If you feel this doesn't matter to you, please ignore it. This page was rated as a Good Article, but has been downgraded because nobody did the donkeywork of listing the attributions to the various statements provided, which is after all a fairly serious dereliction of duty in what's suppoed to be a historical record. Having discussed the withdrawal of GA with LuciferMorgan, I give notice that I am sitting down with the three classic original source texts (Puylaurens, Vaux-de-Cernay and de Tudèle - the last in the Livre de Poche edition as the Martin-Chabot is long out of print) to add the missing inline citations to this page. I do not intend at this point to make any textual alterations, but if comments are made which are NOT justified, be prepared to state your sources now. Jel 21:16, 12 October 2007 (UTC)


 * No probs; I only made a small change. Chris Martin 08:47, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Kendall Walton
A tag has been placed on Kendall Walton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Alex ' fusco ' 5  15:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Kendall Walton
The entire history of the page was a copyright infringement. I've recreated the page as a stub now. Cheers! east. 718 at 16:08, December 17, 2007

World Cup Group A template
Thank you!!! Couldn't work out what was wrong, much appreciated :) - JVG (talk) 10:34, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Canon Johnson C.E. Primary School


The article Canon Johnson C.E. Primary School has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * It's reasonably well established not that I can find the guidelines as I write) that UK primary schools are not of themselves notable enough to have articles, and are normally listed on the settlement article page. This school makes no particular claim to notability; it is older than 100 years, and it is signed up to a Healthy Schools scheme. On this basis it should be deleted.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tagishsimon (talk) 18:14, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Donald X. Vaccarino


The article Donald X. Vaccarino has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Danrok (talk) 15:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)