User talk:Chrismariejones1

Emile Ford
Your recent edits have been reverted. There are a number of reasons for doing so, which relate to the removal of cited references, the insertion of POV statements, and more generally ignoring the need for verifiability. Please note that significant changes to the text need to be referenced. Please take time reading some of Wikipedia editing guidelines, including What it is not and particularly bear in mind this editing dictum - "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth — whether readers can check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true." Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a fansite. Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 10:35, 12 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Once again, your edits to this article have been reverted, for all the same editing protocol reasons outlined both above, and at the article's talk page. Please discuss proposed changes at the aforementioned talk page because, without verifiable sources, such edits will continue to be removed. Thank you,


 * Derek R Bullamore (talk) 14:45, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I've assumed good faith, taken account of policies on living people, balanced the probabilities as best I can, and assumed that what you say, User:Chrismariejones1, is true. Equally, other editors may take a different view and revert me, simply because the information needs to be independently verifiable.  I agree with everything Derek says.  If you, User:Chrismariejones1, want the changes (or something similar) to stay, you must provide sources for your information, and, if there is any further discussion on the article talk page, you must join in that discussion.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:55, 31 January 2013 (UTC)