User talk:Chrismar~enwiki

Chris Mar
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Chris Mar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 14:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:UNISPEC.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:UNISPEC.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Fullcolorlogo.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fullcolorlogo.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 18:21, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Antagonist Perpetrated Aggression
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Antagonist Perpetrated Aggression, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Paragon12321 (talk) 23:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Antagonist Perpetrated Aggression
A training system used by 50,000 SWAT members IMO merits an article. Just keep in mind that verifiability is one of Wikipedia's key policy. Remember that only what can be sourced and verified can be put in an article. Also, reliable third party sourced should be given be given to establish notability. If these policies are kept in mind, I don't see any reason an APA article should be deleted. However, I am not an administrator, and it is the decision of community consensus as well as the administrator's interpretation of that consensus that determines the fate of an article. Paragon12321 (talk) 00:20, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Antagonist Perpetrated Aggression
Thank you for your return and considerate advice. I will make all sure to support the article with verifiable third party reference. Please note to clarify the number of tactical units I personally trained from 1985 through 2005 was as follows over 25 divisions of Taiwan Special Tactics approximately 5000 officers, plus receiving instruction in relevant APA Tactical Combat Protocol included Security Officers of the 1st through 7th Battalions which are Riot teams, Diplomatic Security, Government VIP Close Security, Coast Guard, Tactical Support, Special Operations, Rapid Deployment, County Instructors and National Police Agency National instructors - over 500; totaling over 40,000 active officers, plus members of the PRC PLA Armed Military Police Counterterrorist Instructors and other units over 120 elite operations and head instructors bringing the total number of National Defense, Combined Operations and Internal Security to over 50,000 which were taught by myself and 3 different generations of about 100 APA Tactical Assistant Instructors. I will make the time to establish an appropriate format for the article. Thanks again. Chris Mar Chrismar (talk) 21:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Help
helpme Hi I would appreciate your help with a wikipedia article Extraction (military) which is found http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraction_(military) as the article is 99%  directly copied from my book,” Tactical Combat” - http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Tactical_Combat I do not mind being used as an information source, but the article should give attribution to the source as  it is copied from  http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Tactical_Combat#The_Primary_Objective Chrismar (talk) 15:33, 1 September 2009 (UTC) Chrismar
 * I have added a link to the book. That satisfies the attribution requirement.  But since Wikibooks is not a reliable source, the article is still considered unreferenced.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 16:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * On further review, the text was here first and it showed up on Wikibooks several months later. I've removed the attribution as it is inappropriate unless you can show proof of the chicken or the egg.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 16:48, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. Please look at My Contributions and you will see the article Tactical Combat goes back beyond 2004 Most sites like Answer.com were using my article Tactical Combat as the definition for that phrase many years ago Then I moved to wikisource and was informed that the book which is used as a text book for my Special Tactics teams should be placed on wikibooks. The article Extraction is a copy from the time Tactical Combat was here and I am sure you can verify this by My Contributions. Without a doubt those are my exact words. Thank you for you help in putting this right.Chrismar (talk) 08:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC) Chrismar –Chief Instructor Chris Mar
 * I need to spend some time looking into this. I will get back to you on it.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 11:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Extraction (military)
Hello, Chrismar. I have answered your comment on my talk page in order to keep the conversation intact. -- Kjkolb (talk) 10:30, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Antagonist Perpetrated Aggression for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antagonist Perpetrated Aggression is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Antagonist Perpetrated Aggression until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 12:59, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Chrismar. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Chrismar~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 22:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 11:35, 22 April 2015 (UTC)