User talk:Chrismevs/Sumo languages

Hi Chris,

The lead provides a great deal of information about the topic and the issues people speaking sumo languages are facing. It also provides a brief history of why the language is in danger which gives some insight into what the complete article will contain. Overall, the lead is very well balanced and adding a bit more information will make it even more better. Also, good luck for the rest of the article !

Final Review
Hi Chris, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:


 * 1) Language: On the whole, the article employs proper English spelling and grammar. 5 points.
 * 2) Structure: The structure is idiosyncratic and does not follow any template. 3 points.
 * 3) Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
 * 4) Accuracy: Most of the claims are backed by references to scholarly sources. 5 points.
 * 5) Relevance: Not all of information is relevant, and there's a lot that is totally unrelated to the language and should probably be cut out. 2 points.
 * 6) Length: Word count 2109/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 5 points.

The final score is 25/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 23:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)