User talk:Chrissie64

September 2023
Hello, I'm Soetermans. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chernobyl disaster without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 15:56, 4 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Oh I see, hearsay framing any benefit claim as bogus is ok, the neoliberal economic conservative narrative may be strong but it is mostly based on ideology not actual fact. Chrissie64 Chrissie64 (talk) 16:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Chernobyl disaster, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. StephenMacky1 (talk) 16:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Oh I see, hearsay framing any benefit claim as bogus is ok, the neoliberal economic conservative narrative may be strong but it is mostly based on ideology not actual fact. Chrissie64 (talk) 16:28, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Chernobyl disaster, you may be blocked from editing. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Chrissie64, I strongly urge you to start communicating. Any further removal of content is considered disruptive. You've used edit summaries in the past, so you are capable of explaining your motivations to remove something. Thank you. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:28, 4 September 2023 (UTC)