User talk:ChristTrekker/Archive 7

Nomination of Electoral history of the Constitution Party (United States) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Electoral history of the Constitution Party (United States) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Electoral history of the Constitution Party (United States) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards. --1990&#39;sguy (talk) 23:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blackletter (June 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rankersbo was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blackletter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Blackletter Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rankersbo&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Blackletter reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 22:38, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

🔫 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 🔫. Since you had some involvement with the 🔫 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  — PinkAmpers  &#38;  ( Je vous invite à me parler )  03:56, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Request for opinion
Hi ChristTrekker: Sorry to trouble you, but I could not help but notice your expression of affection for TOS on the Wikipedians who like Star Trek: The Original Series page, and so I would be curious of your thoughts on the notability of a Star Trek author for whom I just created a Wikipedia article -- which may be promptly destined for the trash pile. As a newcomer here at Wikipedia, my first article attempt was indeed recommended for deletion within hours of its creation by a senior user named JzG who seems to me to be overly hostile and dismissive of Star Trek, calling it fancruft (= trivial, obscure, of importance to just a tiny group of fanatics). Since you are a Trek fan, if it is also your good faith opinion that my subject is in no way deserving of an article on this site; and you could let me know, I would feel much more comfortable with the justice of the pending deletion action. My proposed article may be seen here, assuming you visit the page soon enough ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Gurian Kind Regards. Tosresearcher (talk) 05:16, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Color It!


The article Color It! has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 18:49, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Blackletter


Hello, ChristTrekker. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Blackletter".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 21:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Continental Co-ets


The article The Continental Co-ets has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of significant notability beyond a local geographic region. No recordings charted. Fails WP:NMUSIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sundayclose (talk) 15:56, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Trixie (typeface)


The article Trixie (typeface) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "inadequate references for notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 03:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Vala's Pumpkin Patch
Draft:Vala's Pumpkin Patch, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Vala's Pumpkin Patch and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Vala's Pumpkin Patch during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minor League (September 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Minor League and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Minor_League Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shadowowl&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Minor_League reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 &raquo; Shadowowl   Marcos Rodriguez  |  t  |  SPI  |  AIV  |  Sandbox  |  Helpdesk  &raquo;    06:32, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at The Handmaid's Tale (TV series). If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Kiteinthewind  Leave a message! 02:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at The Handmaid's Tale (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Kiteinthewind  Leave a message! 02:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:The Handmaid's Tale (TV series). Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''Please adhere to the AGF rule in your future dealings here on Wikipedia. It seems you have been here long enough to understand what the rules mean.'' Kiteinthewind  Leave a message! 21:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Again, it is you who are not assuming good faith. I make one edit, it gets reverted, and you immediately on my talk page posting the warning above about "disruptive editing". So,, why are you immediately presuming intentional disruption - AGF! ⇔ ChristTrekker 14:56, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jonathan Park


Hello, ChristTrekker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jonathan Park".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Scandinavian Metal Praise


Hello, ChristTrekker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Scandinavian Metal Praise".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  T K K ! bark with me! 15:53, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jew-MJ dispute
Template:Jew-MJ dispute has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.

Category:Macintosh rackmounted computers has been nominated for discussion
Category:Macintosh rackmounted computers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.  Warren -talk- 03:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isolated brain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adventures of Superman ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Isolated_brain check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Isolated_brain?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Whistleblower (magazine)


The article Whistleblower (magazine) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of outward notability -- only self-published sources. Stub length too."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Etzedek24 (Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?) 01:14, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ilana Mercer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ilana Mercer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ilana Mercer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 23:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maiandra GD


The article Maiandra GD has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not enough independent in-depth sources located on search."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 14:21, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of simulation typefaces for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of simulation typefaces is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of simulation typefaces (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —  Scott  •  talk  15:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

🌼 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 🌼. Since you had some involvement with the 🌼 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ToThAc (talk) 13:53, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Messianic Judaism
Portal:Messianic Judaism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Messianic Judaism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Messianic Judaism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:55, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Muslim user templates
Category:Muslim user templates has been nominated for renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. —⁠andrybak (talk) 00:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Political view user templates
Category:Political view user templates has been nominated for merging with Category:Political user templates. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. —⁠andrybak (talk) 00:05, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Category:Christian user templates has been nominated for discussion
Category:Christian user templates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —⁠andrybak (talk) 09:44, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of List of The Belgariad locations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of The Belgariad locations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of The Belgariad locations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 19:47, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:David Eddings locations


A tag has been placed on Category:David Eddings locations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:18, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians in the American Heritage Girls


A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians in the American Heritage Girls requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:55, 27 December 2019 (UTC)