User talk:Christepherwee

Image:Christepher Wee 王崇偉.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Christepher Wee 王崇偉.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Christepher Wee 王崇偉.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: advert To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Christepher Wee 王崇偉.jpg, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Image:Christepher Wee 王崇偉.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

:Christepher wee EXCLUSIVE.jpg
Thanks for uploading :Christepher wee EXCLUSIVE.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 19:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:--PD-self--Christepher wee EXCLUSIVE.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Christepher wee EXCLUSIVE.jpg. The copy called Image:Christepher wee EXCLUSIVE.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 18:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:--PD-self--Christepher wee EXCLUSIVE.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:--PD-self--Christepher wee EXCLUSIVE.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Christepherwee
A tag has been placed on User:Christepherwee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of User:Christepherwee and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Syrthiss (talk) 15:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

this is a legitimate article about actor christepher wee. this is not a promotion of christepher wee but the facts and works of christepher wee. the format of this article were taken from other actors who are in wikipedia such as jackie chan, edison chen, nicholas tse etc.


 * You should look at our guidelines for what is appropriate for wikipedia userpages, and what is not. As it sits, your userpage is outside the scope of a userpage.  If it is your contention that you are a notable actor (such as Jackie Chan), we can move your userpage out into the mainspace for articles...but I can say that it is very likely to be deleted.  Very often, when you are writing about yourself you introduce biases that clash with our policy of neutral point of view.  Its understandable and natural, and as such is why we have strict guidelines on conflict of interest. Syrthiss (talk) 12:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Royal Pets Paradise
A tag has been placed on Royal Pets Paradise, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. H8erade (talk) 09:59, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

this is a legitimate article about royal pets paradise. it is not a promotional article. this article was formated after other company articles in wikipedia such as petsmart, petcetera, kmart, jc penny, and other pet food companies.