User talk:Christhard

March 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to John Quincy Adams, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please see consensus atTalk:John Quincy Adams/Archive 2. Peaceray (talk) 04:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Martin Van Buren, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox.   Peaceray (talk) 05:05, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at John Quincy Adams, you may be blocked from editing. See Talk:John Quincy Adams/Archive 2. Peaceray (talk) 05:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to James Buchanan. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. '' You are making no change to the caption. It still reads "Portrait by Mathew Brady, c. 1850–1870".'' Peaceray (talk) 05:12, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Millard Fillmore. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.   Peaceray (talk) 05:15, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Hi Christhard! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at John Tyler that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. ''Someone already told you that the image is used elsewhere in the article and reverted your edit, so the minor change designation is inappropriate. Please don't try to simply make the same change again. Instead, discuss your reasoning on the talk page.'' DocFreeman24 (talk) 05:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at John Tyler, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Your repeated test edits have risen to the level where we can now call them disruptive edits and vandalism. Please stop now.'' Peaceray (talk) 06:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Martin Van Buren does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision diffs
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 06:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —  Newslinger  talk   06:58, 30 March 2021 (UTC)