User talk:Christian1985~enwiki

Bold text

Editor Review
Hi Christian, i thought it would be great if you could be the last to review me after so long. It would mean a lot if you found the time. Thanks ツ Je no va  20  (email) 12:33, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Poke ツ Je no va  20  (email) 11:26, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments on my talk page
Please leave me alone and do not post unconstructive remarks on my talk page. 94.7.158.48 (talk) 14:29, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I have done nothing wrong. Pointing out that you were violating Wikipedia policy is not unconstructive and you should not have deleted my warning message, this is a big Wikipedia No-No. Coming on my talk page and attacking me calling me a "racist" was out of order and I have made a formal complaint. Christian1985 (talk) 18:49, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

message to attackers
Leave him alone. what has he done to you? you ips who attack this user give honest IP editors a bad name. this shit needs to stop now. 199.101.61.190 (talk) 18:27, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, very well said. There are lots of good honest IP users who do Wikipedia a service but these vandals spoil it for everyone by harassing and bullying people who dare to challenge them. Christian1985 (talk) 18:30, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

I know, and it makes me mad. i've been reading an/i sinse 2005 or something like that, and have seen a plethora of IPs on both sides of the scale. by the way, i like your name, my name is Christian too. 199.101.61.190 (talk) 18:42, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I know what you mean, I used to post as an IP for quite a while myself but as I have become more involved I have created an account. Like I say it is small handful of troublemakers who spoil it for the rest of you. Keep up the good work. Christian1985 (talk) 20:23, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

I sertainly shall, thanks. 199.101.61.190 (talk) 00:52, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

removing speedy tags
Any editor other that the original contributor can remove a speedy tag, and after they have done so, it can not be replaced. See WP:CSD for our policy; WP policy is sometimes confusing, but this is clear and unambiguous.  DGG ( talk ) 02:46, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Electrical, Electronic, Telecommunications and Plumbing Union at AfD
Hi,

I noticed that you tried to add Electrical, Electronic, Telecommunications and Plumbing Union to the log, but failed to do so properly. I started the discussion for you (as per your request in your edit summary): Articles for deletion/Electrical, Electronic, Telecommunications and Plumbing Union. Please state your reason for deletion there.

הסרפד (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 03:18, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Criticism article
Hey, i don't know how much attention you were paying on Talk:Mail Online, but i've started up User:Jenova20/Criticism of the Daily Mail and Mail Online. It would be useful if you wanted to lend a hand there at all. Currently i just intent to grab some resources to see what i have and what the sources support. There's gonna be lots of work to go around if you're bored and want to chip in. Thanks ツ Je no va  20  (email) 15:55, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

DRN
There is a Dispute Resolution Noticeboard incident you may want to participate in concerning the Mail Online here. Thanks ツ Je no va  20  (email) 15:33, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

The Daily Express "incident"
I have made no accusations. When someone says that a monkey runs a newspaper it is obviously intended as a joke, not fact or lie. Nobody is stupid enough to believe that the Daily Express is run by racist monkeys. After a series of highly offensive, totally untrue "stories" about Romanian immigrants in the UK I decided to make fun of the newspaper, since it obviously has lost its journalistic rigour some time ago. Being a Romanian national, I noticed that these so-called articles about Romanians in the Daily Express were based on dubious statistics (big surprise there!), questionable interviews with police officers low enough in their ranks not to have any idea of the overall picture. It is absolutely NOT ETHICAL when you put the equal sign between your 50 member Romanian gang and the remaining 60K honest Romanians living and working legally in the UK, calling us the main perpetrators of recent crime waves. Not only is this untrue, but it is offensive to a proud 22 million nation. The paper tarnishes our reputation so I decided to make a little fun on their Wiki page :) P.S. Why don't you check whydontyoucomeover.gandul.info? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rotterdamian (talk • contribs) 13:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but yes you did make accusations that are not supported by a reference. All the racist monkey nonsense is not only offensive and potentially libellous it is not appropriate for an encyclopedic website. It doesn't matter if it is a "joke", this is not a joke website. All these statements you make here are simply your opinions they are not facts and as such have no place in Wikipedia articles. Christian1985 (talk) 14:24, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

 * Thanks Jenova Christian1985 (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2013 (UTC)


 * No problem. I'm glad we're on speaking terms. It looked touch and go for a bit the first few times we bumped into each other. Enjoy the coffee ツ Je no va  20  (email) 15:38, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * No worries Jenova, yeah we still sometimes have differences of opinoon on some areas but we can be civil about it, nothing wrong with that. I am also happy we are on speaking terms. Keep up the good work. Christian1985 (talk) 18:13, 4 March 2013 (UTC)


 * - Differences are good, disagreements are not. Good luck with your current work ツ Je no va  20  (email) 10:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Re: your comment that "DM is a perfectly reliable source just as any other newspaper", No. It isn't. It is marginal at best. See Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 106 --Guy Macon (talk) 23:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Talk page stalker - I'm glad i stopped reading the Mail Online...I can get my immigration rants and anti-gay news from elsewhere and have more time for the BBC =P ツ Je no va  20  (email) 09:17, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Redcar (UK Constituency)
Re:Trolling from 31.221.61.66.Hi again. I know your feelings but just ignore these trolls after some unnecessary personal abuse regarding your edit on the Redcar (UK Constituency) page. They just wanted a reaction and they got it,though it may have been wiser to just let it pass,you are just encouraging them to do more of this to others,too.

Interestingly,I did edit this page myself a while ago,explaining how Labour managed to conspire to lose one of their safest seats to the Lib Dems in the 2010 General Election's biggest swing (21.8%)! However,this was a rather zany one-off result and didn't happen elsewhere. Perhaps it would be better if there are any comments of this sort abusing you in future to ignore it and report it the admin;for the record, an IP address finder thinks this maybe located in deepest Bedfordshire, if this helps. Thanks, JFBridge, 01:19, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Sign your postings please
Not only IP editors have to sign with ~  – you have, too. Even where you, you can add a signature later. Do not prompt. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:38, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Christian1985. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Christian1985~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 22:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 11:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)