User talk:Christian Farioli

Proposed deletion of Probortunity


The article Probortunity has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unsourced, self-made neologism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 12:38, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

SCAMPER (brainstorming)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of SCAMPER (brainstorming), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.brainstorming.co.uk/tutorials/scampertutorial.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Probortunity


The article Probortunity has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Still an unsourced/unreliably-sourced, probably fictional neologism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 12:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Probortunity, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Ucucha 21:28, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Probortunity
I have nominated Probortunity, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Probortunity. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ucucha 21:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SCAMPER (brainstorming)


The article SCAMPER (brainstorming) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * None of the sources are WP:RS. This activity was concocted by one guy and has not appeared in any significant, reliable sources. The author of this article has basically reworded those other webpages into this non-encyclopaedic entry.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 13:26, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

SCAMPER (brainstorming)
As a result of the Proposed deletion of SCAMPER (brainstorming) mentioned above, the article was deleted. However, an editor has now requested that the article be restored, so I have restored it, and started a discussion to determine whether it should be deleted or not. You are welcome to take part in that discussion, at Articles for deletion/SCAMPER (brainstorming). JamesBWatson (talk) 14:20, 9 December 2010 (UTC)