User talk:Christiandersen

AfD nomination of Racetrack Babies
An article that you have been involved in editing, Racetrack Babies, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself, as you did at Racetrack Babies. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Racetrack Babies
A tag has been placed on Racetrack Babies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; RHaworth 19:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of KLONK Image Measurement


A tag has been placed on KLONK Image Measurement, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --L235 (t / c / ping in reply ) 03:22, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Status and Advice

 * As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article. On the now deleted talk p. you said :
 * Please do not be so eager to delete nessessary pages. Wait and see how much they will be read. I know this is our own software but we have tried to decribe it just as objective as our competitors have described their product, we have been looking for a place to explain objectively as possible what our software package does compared to the others on the market. Not having our product described is twisting the competition. Competitors like ImageJ, and adobe acrobat, also have software product explaining sheets. A new disciplin with image measurement has been introduced and this this tool meets the needs in this area very well.


 * WP is not a product directory. We do not include topics on the basis that the world should hear about them--that's the purpose of a press release; we include topics on the basis that the world does already know of them, and therefore people might reasonably want to know some basic information, because they are already important--that's the purpose of an encycopedia. (We judge the importance by the demonstration of references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources (not press releases or mere announcements) . You make comparisons with some other companies. People already know of Adobe and write about its products extensively. ImageJ has references showing its wide  use. Comparing your not yet well known project to the leader in the field indicates your intent to promote it. We do not do thsat.

I guess that Wikipedia administrators should learn to prioritize information enrichment vs. fighting enthustiatic persons information flow who like to explain about their field of expertise. In this case we inform you guys and enrich the wikipedia with information of a whole new technical field, the development of planimetrics moving from begin a timeconsuming analog procedure done manually with a wheel now moving to digital imaging, but because you do not poses the knowledge to identify this you prefeer to keep wikipedia without this information and not updated. First og all Adobe Acrobat has not had the perimetric feature before last year, and google earth pro has just become free currently, KLONK Image measurement as you see was created in 1993 even before the free ImageJ product and was the first commercial product which had this measurement feature built into it. There is no text in the product description which promotes this only explantory text. Is it possible to excalate this issue? This will be the ruin of Wikipedia. You say that wikipedia is not a product kataloge but never the less you list products which have been developed direclty insperied from our product.

Speedy deletion nomination of Klonk image measurement


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Klonk image measurement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WWGB (talk) 12:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of KLONK Image Measurement


A tag has been placed on KLONK Image Measurement, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Roches (talk) 22:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:KLONK Image Measurement concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:KLONK Image Measurement, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft:KLONK Image Measurement concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:KLONK Image Measurement, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:KLONK Image Measurement


Hello, Christiandersen. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "KLONK Image Measurement".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)