User talk:Christianoronaldoispro

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christiano Ronaldo (November 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christiano Ronaldo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Christiano Ronaldo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Christiano_Ronaldo Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Whispering&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Christiano_Ronaldo reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Whispering ( t ) 14:19, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Draft:Christiano Ronaldo. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you.  Whispering ( t ) 14:22, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Shane Warne, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 09:19, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

gk,kgkh
jhjh Christianoronaldoispro (talk) 09:31, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Very Helpful Warning
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Fleet Lists (talk) 10:13, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I have also undone your edit at Fortnite, where you changed a working URL into a broken URL. -- John of Reading (talk) 10:17, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Your edits are nearly all a mixture of vandalism, editorializing, and overlinking. All those things are undesirable, please stop doing them. I am on the edge of blocking you from editing due to disruption. Now is your chance to prove that you are not being deliberately disruptive. Even if you are acting in good faith, it's still the case that competence is required. SpinningSpark 10:30, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Stern warning
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. All edits have today again been reverted.Fleet Lists (talk) 02:57, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for deliberate disruption. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. SpinningSpark 13:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

reply
Dear Spinningspark,

Please look at the next talk on my talk page. It gives you the answer to your question.

This for SpinningSpark
Hello Spinningspark. It has appeared that you have blocked me from editing. I have been trying my best to help Wikipedia. As a teenager, I do not know much. Please, can you unblock me? I promise I won't make any disruptive edits again.
 * No, I would need to hear a more convincing rationale before unblocking. Use the template in the block notice if you wish to appeal the block. Your immediate edit after my final warning was this edit which broke the template, was wholly unnecessary, was at best incompetent and at worst vandalism.  You followed that with "He could have had made his century if the Perth Stadium Optus Stadium had not been so unpredictable" which is unsourced editorializing. It's just your opinion.  Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a chat forum.  It deals in verifiable facts, not fanciful opinions. SpinningSpark 13:18, 21 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Ok. I understand