User talk:ChristieAugust

Welcome!
Hello, ChristieAugust, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Millie Aviles does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Binksternet (talk) 14:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Millie Aviles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Rsjaffe. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Millie Aviles, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:07, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Millie Aviles. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)


 * You may also be blocked for deleting sourced content, as you did at Millie Aviles. —C.Fred (talk) 03:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 03:46, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Millie Aviles. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Your edits are leaving the article worse off, not better. If you think something should be changed in the article, I suggest you propose an edit on the talk page and get assistance from other editors in making the change.'' —C.Fred (talk) 21:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Millie Aviles, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 04:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Millie Aviles. Any further disruptive editing to the article will result in you being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 05:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Millie Aviles) for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 05:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)