User talk:Christinaxlu/sandbox

Christina's Peer Review by Kelsey
Christina's article is a very nice start. She brings in the concept of compatibility easily and concisely, while also making the concept understandable to the readers. The sentence she added to the lead section brings in the concept of compatibility very well, and it will be a nice addition to the article depending on where she places the sentence. A lot of the information listed in the introduction section would be very beneficial to the lead section.

In addition to this, Christina adds some nice background for the readers before diving into more difficult concepts. She gives a breif overview of what might be seen in the upcoming sections in approachable language so that the reader doesn't get lost in empty jargon. These sections she added are organized well and in a sensible order. However, the application section should probably be the last section of the article. In this way, the reader will understand the basics of the topic and then dive into how their new knowledge can be applied.

The article also does a good job of divvying up the importance of different topics based on their lengths. Though probably more should be added for the coefficients and go into why those are important for the concept of compatibility. Other than that, the article is structured very well.

All of the information Christina presents is very neutral. None of the words she uses gives off an impression of an opinion, and takes all the different sources and accumulates them into a nice, informative article.

The two sources cited in Christin's draft of contributions are very reliable and provide a good insight about the topics she discussed. They are both connected to journals, but very reputable journals. A lot of the draft she has is attributed to these two sources, but as she constructs more of her article, I believe she will incorporate a huge amount of other sources to even out the distribution. One of the sources, however, has a 'missing or empty' error message, so I would fix that before finalizing the article.

Overall, Christina has a nice start on her article, and I'm excited to see the finished product! Kabernathy9 (talk) 20:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)