User talk:Christjesusismyking

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello Christjesusismyking, and and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Drop us a note at New user log so we can meet you and help you get started. In the meantime, here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style (formatting questions)

If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, add a question to the Village pump, ask me on my talk page, or place   on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. (A note on process: Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date.)

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! &mdash; ERcheck (talk) 22:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Ashoka the Great
Ok, was there reason you felt like changing it to Asoka? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Battle of Thermopylae
Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you will catch on to the place and enjoy it. Meanwhile, your few edits have not been helpful ones. Unhelpful edits are either errors or vandalism. I presume that you were experimenting, a major cause of Wikipedia unhelpful edits. You can establish a page for experimentation, just as you can establish a user page. For the user page you just click on the user page tab and start typing. That usually is a brief intro to your persona on Wikipedia. Just a minute I will get you a command for establishing a sandbox.Dave (talk) 04:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Here it is: /mysandbox.

Generally the policy is, you need a reason to change what another editor does. Reasons however are not hard to find. I would say, it might be best to stick to what you know until you get the hang of it. The idea is to improve articles by successive changes. Behaviorally speaking, we are "shaping" articles here. The reason for your change should be stated in the "saved" box commentary. If it is more complex then you set up a title on the Discussion page and let us know what you are doing in case we have other ideas. This is not for personal whims or private opinions or original research or advertising. Do your homework. We try to make these changes in the spirit of good fellowship and honest concience. Your user name leads me to think you would share this opinion; anyone who would use such a name hypocritically certainly has gone far wrong. Well, so much for that. On the Thermopylae one, you had no reason to make that change; it is fine the way it is. Then it came out wrong and you left it wrong. Better not to touch it. On the Ashoka one, if the article uses Ashoka, then if not actually wrong that is the way it should stay. Ashoka is correct I believe. Bonne chance.Dave (talk) 04:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)