User talk:ChristoParis

October 2023
Hello, I'm ThaddeusSholto. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 14:51, 27 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your feedback, ThaddeusSholto. I have adhered to Wikipedia's neutrality and sourcing guidelines while updating the intro. I am open to discussion and collaboration to ensure the article reflects a neutral point of view. Would you mind providing specific feedback on which part of the edit appeared non-neutral so I can address it?
 * Thank you. ChristoParis (talk) 14:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)


 * "celebrated for his soulful infusion"
 * "Emerging onto the music scene"
 * "Benny's signature sound has not only garnered him international acclaim but also forged collaborative paths with globally recognized artists"
 * "caught the ears of the international music community"
 * All these statements are unrefernced and absolutely WP:PUFFERY, MOS:WEASEL and MOS:OP-ED. You took a NPOV and informative intro and turned it into a press release. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 14:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you @ThaddeusSholto for your eagle-eyed scrutiny and for educating me on the guidelines -- WP:PUFFERY, MOS:WEASEL, and MOS:OP-ED were terms I was unfamiliar with, and I appreciate the enlightenment.
 * Apologies for the inadvertent promotional tone in my edits. My background as a UX Researcher and a fervent patron of the arts sometimes gets the better of my enthusiasm, especially in a domain I hold in high regard like Wikipedia. The platform's communal endeavor for truth and knowledge resonates with my professional and personal ethos. However, I understand that every reputable forum has its standards, and I’m here to learn and adhere.
 * I’ll revisit my edit, excise the puffery, weed out the weasel words, and steer clear of op-ed territory.
 * I aim to contribute with the same objective lens that long-standing and adept editors like yourself employ.
 * Your feedback is a stepping stone towards that goal. ChristoParis (talk) 15:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)