User talk:Christofpaar

Dear Ruptor,

sorry, just undoing is not great and I apologize. But frankly, there were quite a few statements that were incorrect. In particular:

- the old version state that the algebraic attack is most devastating. This is completely wrong. In most cases, one can NOT recover the manufacturer key with the analytical attacks but only the device key. - the issue with the 60 bit seed version is incorrect. If a 60 bit seed is used the most powerful attack (namely cloning a key after 2 eavesdropping) is in fact "impossible", at least not without a few 1000 PC years of computation.

However, I think we are now moving to a good version of the page. christof

July 2011
Hello Christofpaar. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * 1) Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * 2) Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * 3) Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * 4) Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 20:41, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

June 2016
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 03:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC)