User talk:Christopher Charles Cantwell

June 2019
Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Charleston church shooting have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Charleston church shooting. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:44, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Charleston church shooting, you may be blocked from editing. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:08, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Charleston church shooting. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 16:41, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:17, 24 June 2019 (UTC)