User talk:Christopher Connor/Archive 3

What is going on here?
I just came out of retirement after I got a phone call from Wendy Starland herself regarding her article. It went from a well-sourced and fleshed-out article to a nanostub. I have reverted your change for the time being and with all due respect and if you feel it's necessary to retrim the article, please let me know. I'll be glad to return to the project long enough to help reshape it if you wish. My talk page is locked down due to insane vandalism, so if you'd like to answer, please do so here and I'll respond as necessary. Again, thanks for your diligence. Best, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:58, 6 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Correction: I reopened my talk page and I've "un-retired" so that I can better help with the problems this article has faced.  Looking forward to working with you.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:59, 6 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I have concerns over your behaviour regarding the article and have opened an ANI page. Christopher Connor (talk) 05:09, 11 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah. Thanks for nothing.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Not Cool
This isn't a cool move, since you are the one who started the thread. With everyone in agreement that the thread was unnecessary drama, it is best that you put the hat back on and drop the stick. Oh and "move along, nothing to see here" is an old Irish cop line, plus it has been used all over TV and Film. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 06:29, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't see a unanimous consensus that the thread was unnecessary. Several of those commentating had made supportive comments on PMDrive's talk page. If the thread were to be closed, I'd like there to be a stronger consensus for it and assurances that PMDrive abide by policy. Basket of Puppies's closing comment was clearly inadequate in explaining why the thread was longer necessary. However, I won't revert again if it's re-hatted. Christopher Connor (talk) 06:35, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Look, an editor closed it, whether the comment was "adequate" or not isn't for you to say. Plus, several admins agreed it was unnecessary drama since you yourself said it was "sort of resolved".  So, I am going to close it and hat it again.  I hope you keep your word. -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 06:41, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I would have preferred someone uninvolved in the discussions to do it. But at least your comment was signed and gave a better explanation. Don't worry, I'll keep to my word. Christopher Connor (talk) 06:51, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Christopher. I am new to Wikipedia, so please bear with me. I work for JCoSS and I am trying to edit some of the things you have put on about JCoSS. We definitely don't want a link to JFS as they are a competitive school, so I would really like this to be removed. Some the text needs looking at too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcoss (talk • contribs) 17:56, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

JCoSS
Hi Christopher. I am new to Wikipedia, so please bear with me. I work for JCoSS and I am trying to edit some of the things you have put on about JCoSS. We definitely don't want a link to JFS as they are a competitive school, so I would really like this to be removed. Some the text needs looking at too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcoss (talk • contribs) 17:57, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The link to JFS (school) seems relevant as they're both prominent Jewish schools and close to each other, although the link certainly isn't the most important part of the article. Removing the references and external links, however, is simply vandalism. Please discuss any issues about the article on its talk page. Christopher Connor (talk) 18:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

If you are happy to, please could you edit the text as follows, as to be honest, I'm really not sure how to. Also, out of interest, what is your interst in JCoSS and how come you put something on there about the school?

The two sentences as follows should be removed as the wording is slightly incorrect - 'seven places each year are allocated to autistic children' and 'The disability services at the school are being delivered by Norwood'.

It could be replaced with the following paragraph 'The Pears Special Resource Provision (PSRP) is incorporated within JCoSS, offering up to fifty places (seven per year) for pupils with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD). Norwood is the lead partner in establishing the PSRP, and has helped JCoSS to recruit its head, advise on curriculum, pastoral and support issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcoss (talk • contribs) 18:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry - like I said, this is my first time on Wikipedia and I have no idea how to use it. I didn't realise that I was vandalising. I would be very grateful if you could remove the link to JFS. Although they are a Jewish school, our ethos is very different. Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcoss (talk • contribs) 18:13, 17 April 2011 (UTC)


 * We can't simply copy text from the JCoSS website as that would violate the policy on plagiarism. Anyway, I've amended the article and removed the see also link. Also, see your talk page for instructions on how to change your username, because it violates the username policy. Christopher Connor (talk) 18:28, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Random poll
Hello Chris, please participate in my random poll be bolding one of the two answer choices I provide at the end of the upcoming question. Ready? Here goes! Question: Have you stopped your anti-Semitic editing? Answer: YES / NO 76.21.250.12 (talk) 03:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your participation! 76.21.250.12 (talk) 03:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Subtle antisemitism
Hello Christopher, your continuing edits to articles regarding Jewish topics contain, from my POV, a high amount of subtle antisemitism that alarms me. Would you mind commenting on whether my perception of your edits are accurate? I have noticed you have been warned, blocked, and topic-banned about this before, and would like to know if you are continuing to try to uphold to that earlier discussion. 96.255.64.62 (talk) 04:14, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * In your edit summary you imply you are the same editor as User:76.21.250.12, who made this comment. Are you the same editor and do you have any other accounts? Christopher Connor (talk) 11:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Yep, those were made from different computers that I happened to have accessed that day. Would you mind answering the original question?  Do you feel that your comments contain a subtle but purposeful amount of antisemitism and/or racism?  Are you adhering to the results of the earlier discussion from when you were warned, blocked, and topic-banned? 137.187.194.153 (talk) 17:35, 20 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Do you have a registered account on this website? Why are you so interested in my edits? Christopher Connor (talk) 02:40, 21 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I have no idea why he is interested, but I'm interested because, well, you're actually quite an interesting person. (Or at least, very confusing.) Would it be OK if I ask a Jewish person to comment on whether your recent contributions might be alarming to the Jewish community? (He's really not very scary at all.) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:11, 21 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Personally Demiurge, I came across Mr. Connor when he removed Sweden's entire account of Antisemitism. I just thought this was so unusual that I looked further, and became troubled by his choice in what to edit and in particular the earlier ban.  Again from my POV, almost his entire editing history seems to be changing Wikipedia in small ways that, to me, come across as slightly antisemitic and racist.  This editing appears to me to be inappropriate given his earlier block, but this is just my view on the matter.  I apologize for any confusion caused by my not making an account, but I am often on travel.  Wikipedia would end up being just one more password I'd have to change after logging into a public network. 131.118.248.130 (talk) 22:41, 21 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Christopher, would you mind answering the original questions? I am interested in hearing your thoughts. As a Jew, my feelings are this is antisemitism of the most pervasive kind because it can be so easy to commit, the attempt to allow/encourage people to trivialize the Holocaust through misinformation.  I would be disappointed to hear that this was done on purpose and simply cannot allow such information obfuscation to occur.  131.118.248.130 (talk) 23:36, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

We have misunderstandings here. First, Christopher was not topic-banned in the ANI discussion which you link. He was earlier blocked from editing (I believe twice) for some repeated bad editing decisions that an overwhelming concensus of editors found offensive. Some of these edits concerned material considered to be racist.

Christopher's edit at the section of the anti-semitism article concerning Sweden, was to remove the section, based on what he said in the edit summary was a copyright violation or plagiarism issue. In my opinion, he should also have specified in the edit summary, at least some details of the work plagiarised. However, no-one chose to revert him, so there was no opportunity or requirement for further discussion. (That is a large part of how we work here - someone boldly changes something, someone else reverts it, and then we move to discussion about it, to find a way forward.)

I've just reviewed the last six weeks of Christopher's edits, and I don't see great cause for alarm. If there are edits by Christopher where he is repeatedly engaging in inappropriate behaviour, then I imagine it would not be hard to find a concensus at WP:ANI for imposing a topic ban, given the discussions that have happened previously. However, I am just not seeing clear evidence for such a pattern of behaviour at the moment (with the Sweden edit or anywhere else), so ideally you need to make a list of diffs showing and explaining the problem. Such a list would have a number of potential uses, but let's try it here first.

Also ideally, Christopher should give his opinions on this. Something he's been reluctant to do in the past, and I don't know why. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 01:29, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

@IP. As Demiurge1000 points out, there was no consensus for a topic ban. Also, the block (one in number) wasn't because of my articlespace edits, but because of the content of some of the essays I wrote, which the editors at ANI considered offensive and provocative (not so much antisemitic). There's been no repeat of the behaviour that lead to the block. I find it strange that you are troubled by my removal of the Sweden section of the antisemitism article because it's a fairly innocent edit. (The section has since been restored but not by any of the regular editors at that page.) I don't know what you mean by "attempt to allow/encourage people to trivialize the Holocaust through misinformation"; I think you need to provide evidence for the relevancy of that comment. Overall, I think your perceptions are wrong, and if you look through my edits, you'll see that most of them don't get reverted. Also, your first comment here suggests your motives are less than pure.

Demiurge1000, you're welcome to ask your friend to comment on my edits. Christopher Connor (talk) 00:54, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks Christopher, and thanks also for correcting some of my minor mis-rememberings of earlier events. I'm not going to ask for any further comment at this time because I don't think it's necessary based on what I've looked at, and also if there is a concern then the IP editor (or someone else) needs to provide some diffs making clear what the concern is. You do choose some controversial areas to edit in, but that's not a problem in itself. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:47, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Christopher, why are you so fixated on topics like Criminal black man stereotype. Once again your racist POV pushing is really alarming. Why, for example, are you deliberately inserting unrelated data into that article? Your agenda is both alarming and scary. I can assure you that your edits are being reviewed on multiple fronts. Your unwillingness to be frank and upfront about any affiliations you have with hate-organizations is most concerning. Are you a member of a neo-nazi organization? 96.255.64.62 (talk) 05:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I have some supplemental questions. Why are you so fixated on topics like Neil Robertson (snooker player)? Are you a member of the Royal National Lifeboat Institution? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 05:52, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't know who this directed to since Mr. Connor has never edited Royal National Lifeboat Institution and made one small edit to Neil Robertson (snooker player). Mr. Connor however appears to have been involved in numerous debates in regards to the Criminal black man stereotype. I will ask Mr. Connor again, are you a member of a neo-nazi organization, or any other organization that promotes religious or racial intolerance? 128.231.77.159 (talk) 13:42, 3 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Register an account or stick to the same IP address, or this conversation won't continue. Christopher Connor (talk) 17:14, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

ommsion of materials edited an re edted by 3 person without informing
Universe is expanding This was edited by William M. Connolley, Adamrce and me 7 time and finalised. Please state your reason behind the removal. Mention it in the discussion before editing again lot ohard work there please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tauhidaerospace (talk • contribs) 16:06, 20 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't like to see my name taken in vain like this. I disagree with T. See the article talk page William M. Connolley (talk) 21:04, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Seeking clarification.
Hi,

What made you reverse my every edit? I would have appreciated had you had made improvements to my select edits, which according to you, were uncalled for.

Please help me understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muhammad Sirajuddin (talk • contribs) 08:51, 28 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Some of your edits changed direct quotes, or added info not in the source (attendance). They also seemed to be promoting the subject, in violation of WP:NPOV. Not all of it was bad, and I could have only reverted the changes that I didn't think should have been made. Christopher Connor (talk) 09:52, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Islam and antisemitism
First thing i wrote the truth,its present in history books you can check that and secondly there was a lot of content in that article that was hurting and painfull for muslim like saying our Prophet was unkind with others and using many harsh words like severe and a sence is created in the article that he was bad and treared jews badly  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AhsenSaleem (talk • contribs) 09:58, 28 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Your edit changed text which was sourced, and I'm not sure you checked those to make sure your text was also in the source. Christopher Connor (talk) 10:10, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!


Christopher Connor (talk) 02:58, 1 July 2011 (UTC) 

Steve Davis
Check out the edit war on this page, Armburst strikes again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.203.254.1 (talk) 13:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Seems like a fairly trivial thing to be edit warring over. You'll just have to thrash it out on the talk page. Christopher Connor (talk) 19:31, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Taking corrective action
You left the following post on the AfD:
 * Maybe some of the info can be verified. However that's not enough to pass notability, which requires significant independent coverage. None of the sources are good enough for that. (I think the MMA fighter is a different person.)

Questions:
 * What would be enough to pass notability? The References provided links to scores of interviews and opinions offered on respected, credible national television/cable channels.  Mr. Julian is highly visible.
 * The MMA fighter is the same person. Would an MMA item be important in a Wiki biography on a businessman? The context would have been as follows: As a personal interest, Mr. Julian has always been involved in body building.  Upon becoming interested in martial arts in the 2000 time frame, he became proficient in a variety of martial arts.  He is of such determined character that he insisted, contrary to the wishes of family and friends, on training for 1 professional bout, which he did, he entered and he won.  (Would this have been appropriate?)

I am under the impression that comments by reviewers are to facilitate correcting the article so that the article is in full conformance to Wiki policies and guidelines. It would be very helpful if the reviews were to explicitly state the concern, link to the Wiki policy to which the item does not conform, and recommend the corrective action to be taken which would satisfy the reviewer. We are all in this together and I think we are all conscientious of doing a beneficial and good job.

Note: We have removed links we thought the reviewers deemed in non conformance. We are in the process or reintroducing links that directly support the article statements and attest to Mr. Julian's notability. Your feedback would be much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ann12h (talk • contribs) 17:59, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * See the general notability guideline which explains the sources required for something to be notable. The key things are significant coverage, reliable, and independent. Can you find any sources that satisfy those three? None of the sources I saw did. For example, this isn't independent because he's a guess there. This interview isn't really about him, so I wouldn't call that significant coverage. And similarly for the others. The MMA thing isn't too important-he isn't notable as an MMA fighter-although I couldn't find evidence they are one and the same. Christopher Connor (talk) 19:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Notability issue
A comment was added on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Andre_Julian Articles for deletion/Mr. Julian] regarding independent coverage or recognition. Thanks in advance for your attention. Ann12h (talk) 01:21, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Death of Michael Gilbert
Gatoclass (talk) 00:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Tummalapalle Uranium Mine
I have made some copy editing at Tummalapalle Uranium Mine article and also added one ALT1 for hook. kindly have a look, Thanks for reviewing.-- . Shlok  talk. 05:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zuhrah ibn Kilab
Hi, extra information has been added to the article in order to demonstrate notability, I hope that's OK, take care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanbircdq (talk • contribs)


 * Sources will be required to demonstrate notability. See WP:N. There needs to be significant coverage of the subject for it to be notable. Right now, that article only has genealogical info and nothing else. Please also sign your posts. Christopher Connor (talk) 00:25, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

AN
Administrators'_noticeboard. You are not named - just a courtesy note since it mentions a thread at Talk:Kurmi in which you have had some involvement. - Sitush (talk) 17:00, 31 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The above has been moved to WP:ANI per request of Fowler&fowler. - Sitush (talk) 19:43, 31 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know. Christopher Connor (talk) 19:47, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

British Pakistanis
Hello there, could I ask why you removed the (sourced) mango and rug material from British Pakistanis? Also, I initially removed the tag beacuse all book references now have appropriate page numbers (unless I have missed some). --Sansonic (talk) 17:54, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I removed it because they were in my opinion trivial things. Who cares if some rugs are sold at John Lewis? The rug material was sourced to the store section of the John Lewis website, so the source would have been considered a spam link. Also, the material isn't particularly relevant to the article, which is about Pakistanis in the UK, not about products made in Pakistan. Source 118, "Encyclopedia of diasporas", has no page numbers; also, the same book appears to be used elsewhere. There's also several papers/reports that don't have them (I normally have them unless there's only a few pages). Christopher Connor (talk) 18:55, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Hook declined
I've declined your hook at Suicide by hanging. I'm sorry, but the use of the word 'recommended', as well as the general 'how-to' nature of the article, makes it unsuitable for a front page space. The Cavalry (Message me) 21:54, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * You haven't given a policy-based reason to unilaterally and instantly reject the DYK. I'm guessing you won't change your opinion on the matter? Christopher Connor (talk) 22:52, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suicide by hanging
Now at AfD: Articles for deletion/Suicide by hanging. Christopher Connor (talk) 22:56, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Suicide on the London Underground
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 15 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I saw this on the front page, and clicked on it, and read it, without realising it was yours. Don't know why that's funny, but it is. 5.5k views is fairly respectable (I guess you're supposed to add it to that table now), although I imagine you've had more. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:31, 16 August 2011 (UTC)


 * A short while before that one, I nominated another article, suicide by hanging, which I had really high hopes for, but an arb didn't like it and got on the case (with a lengthy investigation into my history), and that was pretty much the end. My request to have it reinstated simply rolled off the page without anyone caring. Funnily enough, the same arb approved the London Underground article. Christopher Connor (talk) 21:45, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Computer
My computer is acting really strange right now. Please wait so i can give a proper response. And please do not defend comical edits such as this. Thanks. Pass a Method  talk  17:15, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Defending the indefensible
Your defense of the mosque built in India is the equivalent of saying that man landed on the moon in the stone age. Or like saying that Christianity reached the Amazonian jungle before it reached the outskirt of Jerusalem. Your defense of an Indian mosque in 629 is mind-boggingly unintelligent, and i hope you're joking when you're defending this claim. How the **** could there have been a mosque in India when a mosque has not even been built in Mecca, the holiest site in islam?! Please stop wasting time with this nonsensical tirade. If you really want to continue this debate then lets take it to WP:RSN so you can embaress yourself some more. Pass a Method  talk  20:16, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on English Defence League. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.-- Snowded TALK  01:06, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

DYK for Death of Mi Gao Huang Chen
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Lede
I dont see why you want to add the sentence "which frequemtly result in violence"' to the edl lede. The lede already says that edl clashes with counter-demonstrators, so isn't that enough? Your sentence would be superfluous. As for the part about "EDL views islam as a threat to English culture". Thats untrue. The EDL official site says it is only against extremist islam, not islam in general. Pass a Method  talk  18:29, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the late reply. I agree with you on this point. Am still waiting to hear from Snowded though. Christopher Connor (talk) 16:27, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * It's disappointing to hear that this user continues to make edits that appear to express subtle anti-semitism. Projecting your views on to an organization like EDL seems like a poor way to compose an encyclopedia. 72.75.88.76 (talk) 02:24, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Louise Casey
Materialscientist (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Semitic question
In my experience, people as anti-semitic as you seem to know many nazis. I am curious, how many nazis do you know? Thanks, Danny. 72.75.100.190 (talk) 05:25, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Criticism of Islam sidebar
Template:Criticism of Islam sidebar has been nominated for merging with Template:Criticism of religion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.

Ronnie O'Sullivan
Thanks for the try, but I'm already searching the sources. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 19:35, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 21:44, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, that should put an end to the tagging. Christopher Connor (talk) 22:06, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Black people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Pass a Method  talk  20:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Black people, you may be blocked from editing. Pass a Method  talk  20:20, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Spread Betting
Hi Christopher,

I would like to know why you removed the spread betting strategies section from the spread betting page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SB Beginner (talk • contribs) 09:02, 12 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I removed it because it had poor references (see WP:RS). Was also written in a casual tone. Christopher Connor (talk) 19:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Islamophobia
Wikipedia states, "Islamophobia is prejudice against, hatred or irrational fear of Islam or Muslims." What in the world convinced you that Islamophobia does not belong in the hate category? Your edits on ethnicity and religious topics concerns me. This combined with your recent block as a result of your using excessive Nazi imagery paints a very troubling trend of your history as a Wikipedia editor. I would strongly suggest that you not edit topics that appear to consistently get you into trouble. This kind of bigotry and hatred has no place in Wikipedia, or in its editors. JamaUtil (talk) 02:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC)


 * For the sake of accuracy, a block considerably more than a year ago is not a "recent" block.


 * I think you should consider the possibility that a great many of the controversial edits made by Christopher are just downright odd, as opposed to being prima facie instances of "bigotry and hatred". --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:19, 18 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Dear JamaUtil, do you need heart medication? If you do, please take it before you read further. My revelation is going to blow your mind! Okay taken your heart medication? Well check out this link Image:World-map-2004-cia-factbook-large-2m.jpg. Believe it or not, there is a world outside the United States. Indeed most of the world is outside the United States!!! I do hope you took your medication since I don't want to be responsible to your death due to the shock of this discovery... P.S. After going through the history I found out you are User:JamaUtil who was born in 1992 so I guess you don't need heart medication. After you've gotten over the shock of this recent discovery, how about reading Sign your posts on talk pages? Think about it, if you sign your posts, people would know who you are so our reponses could be more appropriate... OMFG, l33t and all that, I know! BTW, if anyone is thinking of pointing me to Civility, don't bother I've read it and understand it. And BTW, I've read No personal attacks as well and don't consider this a personal attack. 72.75.116.155 (talk) 20:39, 22 April 2012 (UTC)


 * JamaUtil's got a grudge against me because I AfD'd an article he cared about two years ago and he's not been able to forget it. I've always known it was you and at least now you're man enough to sign in when posting here. If you think you can bait me into attacking you, I hope you realise it's not going to work. I just find reading the same message over and over again very tedious. Christopher Connor (talk) 15:31, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Criminal black man stereotype
Hi, you edited this page] in 2010. Since then something went wrong. In particular, the footnote attached to the name "Marc Mauer" was changed. I was wondering who the heck was Marc Mayer (ie why his opinion is important here). Unfortunately the pdf file of Quillian & Pager you linked if dead link now, so I cannot see for myself. Can you please figure it out (confirm/revert the footnote change)? Staszek Lem (talk) 03:12, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Never mind. I figured it out myself. Staszek Lem (talk) 03:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Band Press Play on Tape
Hi! I've restarted the article Press Play on Tape. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)