User talk:Christopher S Murray

Your contributed article, Lt Christopher Murray


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Lt Christopher Murray. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Christopher S Murray. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Christopher S Murray – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cindy ( talk to me ) 04:40, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Christopher S Murray for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher S Murray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Christopher S Murray until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cindy ( talk to me ) 05:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Christopher S Murray. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t &bull; c &raquo;  06:49, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Christopher S Murray. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t &bull; c &raquo;  09:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
Would you also disclose all the socks that you have created, whether you've used them or not, whether we know about them or not? Daniel Case (talk) 18:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The only other one is Dr Deal Lewis nothing else. --Chris. 09:11, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

What sort of editing do you plan to do, if unblocked? You are unlikely to be unblocked as long as it seems likely that your only purpose in editing Wikipedia is vandalism. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:08, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Let's back the truck up
Chris, here's the issue: Wikipedia is not a place to write about yourself, period. That would be the case even if you personally did meet the notability guidelines, which I'm sorry to say, you don't. How many versions of your autobiography have you created while using all of these extra accounts? You're attempting to break the rules by a) creating new accounts (including a "Dr" that is supposed to make it look more official I suppose), and b) giving the same article different names. On top of that, whenever an editor nominated these improper articles for deletion, you would edit-war to remove the tags, which is vandalism. Is your problem a misunderstanding of the purpose of Wikipedia? Is it because you don't think the rules of this private website apply to you? Is it because you think the story about you is just that important, so you'll do whatever it takes? I think some explanation of what in the world you're doing and thinking would be helpful here (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC)