User talk:Christopherdgreen

Hello :-) I just wanted to thank you for your work on the history of psychology article. Well done. I also like your "Classics" site. --Heida Maria 11:13, 21 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I'm always happy to talk to another who has been touched by his noodly appendage. Are you a pirate? :-) If you don't mind, please acknowledge this message when you receive it. I've never used User Talk before and I don't know if I am doing it right. Best, Christopherdgreen 03:24, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi again :) It's best to answer people's comments on their own sites (my user page in this case), then they get notified of it. And yes, I'm an aspiring pirate! P-)

I began the article on Town Ball. I notice that a sentence has been inserted saying David Block has "proven" Chadwick's Rounders assertion to be false. I would not use the word proven here, since in 1905 Spalding proved that baseball did not come from Rounders; in 1939 Henderson proved that baseball did come from rounders; in 2005 Block proved that it did not come from rounders. I think that discussion is better suited to the Origins of Baseball page, since this page is neither about rounders nor about baseball. Can we downgrade "proven" into something less dogmatic? Buffalohead 15:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

James Burris Angell
A template has been added to the article James Burris Angell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Sarcasmboy 03:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of James burris angell
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on James burris angell, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because James burris angell is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting James burris angell, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Wallace Baird


The article John Wallace Baird has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 02:09, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
 Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 16:35, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Mark Baldwin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reconstruction (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)