User talk:Christopherparham~enwiki/Archive02

'''This page is an archive and its contents should be preserved in their current form. New additions to this page are unlikely to be seen; please direct all comments to my latest talk page at User_talk:Christopherparham. Thanks!'''

'''Welcome to my talk page. I will respond to comments made here on your talk page, so no need to watch. Please note your responses here, as I will probably not be watching your talk page unless I messaged you first.'''


 * Archive -- November 21, 2004 to October 14, 2005

Woburn Gifted
Christoper, thanks for the message on my talk page. I guess I was being overzealous and you were right to pull the Speedy on Woburn Gifted. Nevertheless, the article does not assert any real importance to the subject, nor does it even provide the location of the school to which the department is supposedly connected. It is, though, full of nonsense including the fact that many students “go on to prestigious post-secondary learning institutions such as... Hidden Leaf Village” and that a “giant snake” has been known to protect the school from Gamabunta's wrath. The teachers named in the article are all Naruto characters and the author 24.101.82.247 is a repeat vandal of the Woburn Collegiate Institute page. What are your suggestions? Should it be merged into that page? --JJay 12:59, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

David
thanks for helping out :-)
 * This from User:67.101.145.34.

Rousseau
Your edit of my commentary on Rousseau (which I did as an anon, before I became a user), placing it as a footnote, was clearly a better way to handle the material than the way I had done it. As you said, it was too long for an intro. But my concern in dropping it to a mere footnote is that the ramifications of the various interpretations of the statement will be lost to most readers. I guess I would like them reading the rest of the article with that perspective in mind.

Might there be a middle ground? Do you think the point could be made elsewhere in the body of the article? I ask you as one who has clearly been doing this much longer than I. Unschool 20:47, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Reply
Hey Christopherparham. I replied to your comments on the FAC. OmegaWikipedia 06:49, 16 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Good job..I've replied to the FAC again. OmegaWikipedia 22:08, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Celestianpower is an admin
Thank you very much for your support - my bid (as you probably know) went swimmingly. I couldn't have asked for a better one. Thank you very much and I just hope I don't mess up! I don't think I know you but good luck in future exploits anyway! --Cel e stianpower hablamé 12:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Steel Claw
Dear Christopher, Thank you for adding the old peer view tag in Steel Claw article discussion page. --Cyril Thomas 18:23, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

My RfA
Thanks for supporting my RfA. I will use my new powers wisely! --Wikiacc (talk) 19:11, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Woodroffe Avenue
The version of "08:34, 24 September 2005" (which is 5 days prior to the AfD close, and 2 days before the last AfD comment) is practically word for word identical with the most current version available, except for the addition of one short (2-3 sentance) paragrpah at the very end, plus three cited references. I have done a detailed comparison of these two versions. I honestly do not think current version can be described as "much enhanced" over the 24 Sept 05 version. There seem to have been several edits during the AfD, and the version near the end of the AfD may have been significantly enhanceds over the one at the start, but people voting well after this version was posted still voted to delete, so i think we have to take it that a version essentially identical to the current one was deleted by AfD. Please reconsider your VfU vote in light of these facts. DES (talk) 20:12, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Apparent impersonator
You'd probably like to know about the User:Christoperpharham vandal account, which I've now blocked indefinitely.--Pharos 21:45, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Vietnam War (Second Indochina War)
Looks like I was a little hasty in checking references. I read the article more closely and it does state that US troops withdrew January of 1973. Thanks for catching my error. &mdash; Gaff ταλκ 00:17, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

My RfA
Hi Christopherparham. Just wanted to thank you for supporting my RfA. I hope I will be able to live up to the confidence placed in me. --Cyberjunkie | Talk 03:58, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Christopher - Thanks for your support on my recent RfA. I'm glad that you found my contributions interesting. If you want to learn more, we can always use more people at the game theory project! If you ever need anything, please ask. --best, kevin · · · Kzollman | Talk ·· · 05:28, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Chris, thanks for your support on my RFA. I very much appreciate it. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to ask. See you around! &mdash;thames 18:24, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Thank You
Thank you Christopher for your support in my recent request for adminship. It was successful thanks to you. I will strive to an open, approachable and transparent administrator. --Jcw69 18:11, 21 October 2005 (UTC)


 * I'll just tag my wee thank-you note on the end here, if you don't mind. Thanks for your interest in RfA candidates, and especially my recent candidature. Although I don't think I've come across you in my editing, I hope that we might be of mutual support to each other in the future. --Gareth Hughes 19:55, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Hurricane Wilma vandal
Just to let you know, I've blocked that wonderful vandal you just encountered for 48 hours. David Newton 20:47, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Admin?
I normally see you reverting vandalism and in AFD alot and I think you will make a good canditate for adminship. Want me to nominate you --JAranda &#124; watz sup 21:01, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Publius Sulpicius Quirinus
Many thanks: I am redirecting the page to the existing Quirinius page: please feel free to delete it and replace the link from the Legio X Fretensis page.
 * This from User:81.240.15.52.

Redirection complete and tested.

CBW RfA
Thanks for taking the time to vote on my RfA. If you have any concerns over my actions please let me know. CambridgeBayWeather 23:29, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Tomf688 RFA vote
I'm trying to make sure that I take the time to thank everyone who voted in my RfA, and verify that they don't have any concerns over my experience, neutrality, etc. If you have a problem, please drop a line on my talk page and I will answer it as best as I can. Again, thank you. -- tomf688 {talk} 02:34, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

the wub's RfA
Thanks a lot for your support on my RfA, I really appreciate it. the wub  "?!"  13:08, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Titoxd's RfA
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA. I never thought I would get so much support! Thanks to your help, my nomination was the 10th most supported RfA in Wikipedia history. Now, please keep an eye out on me while I learn the new tools, ok? Thanks again! Tito xd (?!?) 17:12, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you very much for your support. :) -- a.n.o.n.y.m  t 20:35, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

About you
Chris, I've been meaning to come by and say this for a while. You do a great job around the wiki, both as an editor and more generally as a contributor. I've been a fan of you federalist contribs for a while, and have secretly been hoping that you'll write an entire series of detailed articles on the lot :). Especially #51, which is too important to be a one para stub. I don't consider myself sufficiently knowledgeable about them to write well on them, but am very happy to cheer from the sidelines. I did make a couple of edits to the refs in one, I think 10, recently, one of which I note you disapproved of; I understand the view, although I do believe a mutually acceptable method of writing that section is possible. I intend to get to it in some weeks when free of the professional duties currently preventing my usual level of involvement on WP. Anyway, this is just a note of thanks and encouragement for the work you do. Regards enceph  alon  05:19, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, Chris. By the way, why in God's green earth aren't you an admin yet? I presume you've no use for sysop, and have indicated so in the past? If not, please let me know: I'll be more than happy to nominate you (or drop suitable hints to a better-known or longer-serving editor, should you understandably prefer one) :) Lewt me know, k? enceph  alon  11:16, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Removal of Zereshk from RfA
Thank you for removing Zereshk from RfA. That was an astute observation, and was missed a few people including myself. Just a couple of notes; Thanks, --Durin 13:19, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * When you remove an RfA, please make sure that you close out the RfA properly by changing the Vote Here link to "Final", updating the final tally of votes, and adding the appropriate header/footer (in this case - ). I did this for Zereshk, and as an example of what to do, you can see this diff.
 * Also, please make sure that you update Unsuccessful adminship candidacies. Again, an example diff.

Bounty Board
Greetings. You've recently been involved with working on get articles up to featured status, so I wanted to let you know about a new page, Bounty board. People have put up monetary bounties for certain articles reaching featured status - if the article makes it, the bounty lister donates the stated amount of money to the Wikimedia Foundation. So you can work on making articles featured, and donate other people's money at the same time. If this sounds interesting, I hope you stop by. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 22:20, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

a fellow Republican
I recieved your message! Thanks for thinking of me! I read a bit about you, and saw how you're right wing. That's great to hear! Good luck in school!

josh.

Tomf688's RfA
Well, it seems I'm now an administrator. I wanted to thank you for your vote of confidence, and, as always, feel free to drop me a line at any time. -- tomf688 {talk} 01:05, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you for your support! If you should ever have any concerns about my actions as an administrator, please be sure to tell me! Kirill Lokshin 13:27, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Dvyost RfA thanks
Thanks for your support on my RfA! Rest assured that I'll do my best to wield the mop with honor and righteousness. Cheers! --Dave 14:23, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for your vote, and HDI discussion underway ...
Hello! I hope you're well. I'd like to thank you for participating in the vote earlier to include the HDI in the country infobox/template. Yay!

After a lengthy gestation, a discussion piece has been prepared to help give form to the vote. If you've a preference for how and where this information should appear in the infobox, I'd appreciate it if you head on over there and comment. :)

After a decision is arrived at, if at all, I'm also hopeful to prevail upon you to add the values (if you're willing and comfortable) for a handful of countries; the more people doing it, the less time it will take to implement the vote and realise the fruits of our collective labour.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks again for your co-operation! E Pluribus Anthony 04:02, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

RFA for Johntex
Hello, I want to thank you for your support of my RfA. Please let me know if I can ever be of service and I'll try to help if I can. Best, Johntex\talk 00:09, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Exactly the same message coming from me, with the obvious exception in that if that help requires shiny buttons, etc. ^_^ I'm adapting your vote, "do not abuse admin editor's tools", and will try to keep it in mind at all times. Thanks again! brenneman (t) (c) 12:48, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject Inclusion vote
While I understand that there's not much it can do with two members, there's the distinct possibility that it will grow - and inspire others to fire up in response. I'm one of the few Wikipedians these days that's been around long enough to remember the absolute shitfight that occurred once the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians became active on Meta, and Wikipedia would be a much less friendly place if a de facto ceasefire hadn't been found on that front. I'm really not keen to risk seeing it all start again for no apparent reason. Ambi 14:48, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Haukur's RFA
Thank you for supporting my nomination till the end. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 21:05, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

PRueda29 RFA
Thank you for your support! I really apprciate it. PRueda29 13:34, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Wheel of Time wikicity
Hey, if you have any interest/inclination, there is now a Wikicities project at [wot.wikicities.com] that you may be interested in. In particular, I'd like to get some of your experience on specialized fictional articles in our categorization scheme and some of our layout/policy proposals. Please see the Community portal for more information. --nae'blis, who is not logged in at the moment

Mania chat
The first global wikimania chat will be tomorrow at 5pm, mainly on IRC; think you can make it? +sj + 01:03, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Come to Thayer basement (the HCS office) for chat and donuts, if you can... +sj +

Thanks from Pamri
Hi, Thanks a ton for supporting and voting at my RFA. I am now a wikipedia administrator. I hope I can keep your trust. Thanks again. --Pamri &bull; Talk &bull; [ Reply] 16:30, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Thank-you for expressing your confidence in me at my recent Request for Adminship. The final result was 40/0/0, and my "superpowers" have now been activated. I look forward to helping out with the development of the encyclopedia. User:Physchim62 (talk • contribs)

Johann Wolfgang's RfA
Thank you for your support on my RfA. I will use my new abilities with the common interest in mind. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Johann Wolfgang [ T ... C ] 03:09, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for supporting my RfA
I know I've been slow in saying this, but thanks for supporting my request for adminship. It was an honor to be both nominated and approved as an admin. If there is ever any adminish (is that a word :-) things you need help with, please let me know. --Alabamaboy 16:23, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Fir e  Fo  x RFA
 

Thanks for your support on my request for adminship.

The final outcome was (96/2/0), so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any queries about my actions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Again, thanks! Fir e  Fo  x  18:12, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

THANK YOU!
Thank you so much for voting in my RfA, and especially thank you for supporting me. I really appreciate it, and will wield the mop and bucket the best way I know how. I, like RoboCop, promise four things: I hope to do all those things and, even if I can't keep my fourth classified, will do all I can to be a great admin. Stop by my talk page, or on article pages; I look forward to working with you. A belated Thanks again, User:Mys e kurity|Mysekurity ]] additions | e-mail]]04:22, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Serve the public trust
 * 2) Protect the innocent
 * 3) Uphold the law
 * 4) Classified

User: EvKnight13
Hey Christopher,

Evans and I are buddies, and we kind of goof on each others pages. You can see mine as an example. As such, I'm not really vandalizing, and I really don't want to get into an edit war over it. So, if you think it's still inappropriate, or whatnot, just tell me on my talk page, I guess? Thank you. --ParkerHiggins 05:00, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup
Thanks for your vote of support on my nomination to become an administrator, Christopher. I passed, and my floor rag has since been bestowed upon me. Please let me know if you need me to help with anything in particular! —BrianSmithson 16:16, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Thank you
Just wanted to drop by and thank you for taking the time to respond to my RfA. I really appreciate the comments! .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 16:07, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Hi!
Thank you for the informatino!

Problem with Zora, as i see it: She is arrogant, stubborn and a bigot.

Arrogant: She always thinks she is right, even if i bring ten sources to the opposit, and she haves zero sources for her claim.

stubborn: even if proven wrong, she does not care, she keeps doing it.

bigot: She is not capable of seeing how the other thinks.

Yes Zora, i do hope you are reading this. (She also stalks me).

Anyhow, thanks for leting me know. --Striver 03:56, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Ianblair23's RfA
G'day Chris, I would like to thank you for supporting me on my RfA. It closed with the final tally of 57/0/0. I can only hope I can live up to the expectations that this wonderful community of ours demands from each of its administrators. If you ever need anything, please just let me know. Cheers! -- Ianblair23 (talk) 07:21, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

My RFA
Thanks for your support. I've now been made an administrator. I'll do my best not to let you down :) --Sherool (talk) 02:24, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for supporting me for adminship. The RfA passed today. I look forward to working with you to make Wikipedia a better place. --Nlu 03:48, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Great work
Here's a small gift for an excellent article:

GraemeL's RFA
Hi Christopherparham, I am now an administrator and would like to thank you for your support on my RfA. I was very surprised at the number of votes and amount of and kind comments that I gathered. Your comments indicate that you think I'm unlikely to abuse my powers, but please don't hesitate to contact me if I mess up in their use. --GraemeL (talk) 14:41, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Thank you!
Hi Christopherparham, Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. I was both surprised and delighted about the amount of support votes and all the kind words! If I can ever help with anything or if you have any comments about my actions as an admin, please let me know! Regards, Joann e B 14:43, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Ray's afro
Well, the line "Ray can be easily recognized by his large afro." may seem insulting to him! I am a close friend of his, and I don't think he'd like that. He's very proud of his afro, but I don't think he'd be too fond of you talking about it and putting it in his little biography...
 * This from User:207.200.116.138.

Template:Philosophy topics RfC
We have a content dispute issue. Please comment on the talk page. This message is being sent out to everyone who didn't vote Delete in the last TfD of the template, ie: User:SimonP User:Jules.lt User:Pjacobi User:thames User:Michael User:Christopherparham User:FranksValli User:Silence User:Andymussell User:Moosh88 User:Rick Norwood User:Izehar

RfA thanks
I'd like to thank you for your support of my RfA. As I wrote, I was looking forward to feedback from the community, and I would like to let you know that you should please feel free to leave any further feedback for me you may have for me in the future at my Talk page. Thanks again. Jkelly 08:52, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Cheers
I hope I prove you right and don't succumb to the dark side! Thank you for the support, Steve block talk 09:28, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your support
Hi, Christopher. I just want to thank you very much for supporting my RfA, and to say also that I hope I'll make a good job of it. I'm supposed to be working on an assignment at the moment, and had delayed thanking people, but I'm finding the new rollback button so easy to use that I'm just keeping Wikipedia open on my browser while working on other things, and I thought I'd like to thank at least a few of my supporters while I'm here. Cheers. AnnH (talk) 20:52, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Sean Black RfA
Thank you very much for your support of my RfA. Thanks, in part, to you, I am now an Administrator, and I pledge to use my newfound powers for good rather than evil. Thanks again!--Sean|Bla ck 07:59, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Please read
BrandonYusufToropov 14:03, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your vote on the Dictators AfD
I am now on vacation and can't really use the web much, so I can't keep an eye on the process.
 * Clearly there is no grounds to delete the article based on NPOV considerations - since if there are at least some dictators (some users deny this is NPOV by the way), they can be listed.
 * 172's reason for deletion is that it is OR to classify someone as a dictator. (Clearly a willful distortion and utterly fatuous.)  Even if you accept his take on OR, the same logic as above applies - if at least some people can be described as dictators without violating OR (a position which even he concedes), there can be a list.  If 172 was behaving rigorously, he would have changed his vote to keep when he conceded that even in the terms of his take on OR, some people can be described as dictators.
 * The other argument used by some is that it is hard to classify some people, clearly no ground for deletion of the article.
 * By my count, there are 25 "deletes" and "19 Keeps". Of those "deletes" it appears that 13 were spammed by 172 prior to voting - often with obsequious comments attached.
 * 172 has refused to materially defend his take on NOR in terms of any criteria in WP:NOR even abrasively deleting a query from a newbie on the subject in his talk page. Is it possible to get some official clarification on the NOR policy before this becomes a precedent? jucifer 02:21, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * sorry about the duplication, I don't know why that happened.jucifer 02:27, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Compensating variation & wage gap
You rephrased and removed my linking to wage gap in your compensating variation article example comparing different jobs across the same group of workers. I totally agree with that- that example wasn't refering to the same idea(wage gap is not used to refer to a wage difference between jobs). However, I think compensating variation can also be used to explain wage gaps; I've added a new paragraph to the article on how. Message me if you disagree. =) Intangir 20:13, 4 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Ok, I've reworded the paragraph to be more careful with the semantics. BTW, | here is where I got the inspiration for the motherhood example. I think that when that paper refers to the wage gap they aren't thinking of a strict 'equal labor' definition, but more of a 'seemingly equal labor' definition. Intangir 01:21, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Military Keynesianism
I'm not sure how to request more information, so hopefully this gets somewhere. I wanted to get some sources that discuss the basic definition of military Keynesianism. Thanks.


 * This from User:152.163.100.201, reply also posted at their talk.


 * Hi! That was actually the first article I wrote, so it's not super clear or sourced. The term is usually used by those on the left to descibe the sort of policies discussed in the article. The concept was developed by Michael Kalecki during WWII, in the paper "The Political Aspects of Full Employment." Getting hold of this paper from a library would be a good source to start with. Online sources are harder to come by, but a Google search might provide something helpful. Google Scholar also points to a number of other papers that could help you out. Hope this helps... Christopher Parham (talk) 04:48, 5 December 2005 (UTC)