User talk:Christopherpgreen

Welcome!

Hello, Christopherpgreen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Your submission at Articles for Creation
Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia&. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. so nia ♫♪ 07:13, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia& was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Fridae'§Doom &#124;  Spare your time?  04:59, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia& was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 17:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 ASAHI Net, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 02:11, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
 * Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia&. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text  to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Hallows AG (talk) 07:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted.; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Tokyogirl79 (talk) 18:15, 30 November 2011 (UTC) There wasn't enough to the article to prove that the article in question is notable outside of the company that made it. Not all products are notable enough or sourced enough to have their own article. The only source in the article is hidden behind a paywall, which does not allow it to be a reliable source. Even with that one source it seems to be more of a "this product launched" type of news article, which is good but doesn't entirely show that it's notable. The biggest problem with this is that the company is in Japan, meaning that a lot of its sources are probably in Japanese. You might want to just keep the Manaba Course a mention in the Asahi Net article until you can find enough sources to show that it is notable outside of the company. Since this program is educational based, I recommend that you look into getting some of the people from WikiProject Education to help you as far as writing the article and getting sources go. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 18:15, 30 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79 Thank you for your thoughtful and helpful comments. I will attempt to update the ASAHI Net page. Christopherpgreen (talk) 04:54, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Having looked at the page for Asahi Net, I highly highly HIGHLY recommend that you merge the material from this page to that one. It sorely needs more to the article as well as more reliable sources. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 18:16, 30 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79

June 2012
Hello, Christopherpgreen. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article manaba, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. The website lists Christopher Green as a contact person for ASAHI Net, the manufacturer of this product. GabrielF (talk) 00:49, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/manaba course concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/manaba course, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/manaba course


Hello Christopherpgreen. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "manaba course".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 21:26, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Asahi Net International logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Asahi Net International logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Manaba


The article Manaba has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Article has not has any independent sources added since it was created in 2013. A search finds little coverage."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Manaba


A tag has been placed on Manaba, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Atlantic306 (talk) 23:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Manaba for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manaba is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Manaba until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)