User talk:Christophervincent01

Disambiguation link notification for March 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crocus City Hall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clarin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

June 2024


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Fram (talk) 12:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * How was this an "attack page?" It was written from a Neutral point of view, without any opinionated negative wording being used towards either the victim or perpetrator. Secondly, look at this old version of the Vallow–Daybell doomsday murders, the page was about the murders, but it included information about the perpetrators before their trials even started and only had 2 references, yet it wasn't labeled as a G10 criteria for deletion for being an "attack page." Also, what's the reason for this abusive language being used in the deletion feed (1 2)? Christophervincent01 (talk) 20:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I want to be as clear as possible about this, edits about WP:BLPs describing them as having committed crimes in wiki-voice without any conviction are severe violations. Additionally, WP:BLPCRIME says that we should generally be avoiding naming non-public figures who have been accused of crimes. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of an attack page


A page you created has been deleted because it was a biography of a living person that was entirely negative in tone and unsourced, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and users who create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * How was this an "attack page?" It was written from a Neutral point of view, without any opinionated negative wording being used towards either the victim or perpetrator. It also had 20 references spaced throughout the article, so it isn't unsourced. Thirdly, look at this old version of the Vallow–Daybell doomsday murders, the page was about the murders, but it included information about the perpetrators before their trials even started and only had 2 references, yet it wasn't labeled as a G10 criteria for deletion for being an "attack page." Christophervincent01 (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I've responded on my talk page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

A deep breath, and let's try this again
So, it's definitely shitty to get kicked in the teeth by BLP enforcers, and I'm not going to act like I'm not one of the ones who was doing the kicking. I came on so strong about this because it is, in my view, the most important policy on Wikipedia. All of the back and forth dealing is Israel and Palestine, Iranian manipulation of articles, the endless wars over if a politician is right-wing or far-right don't really matter all that much in the grand scheme of things. When dealing with BLP content dealing with non-public figures, however, Wikipedia will invariably be the first thing that shows up if someone searches for their name. In this situation we can have a clear negative effect on a person's life. That is why we have to take the utmost care in dealing with biographies.

It's easy to look at the news stories and say "Well, he did it," but acquittals happen all the time, people are framed, there are miscarriages of justice, and all sorts of other weird stuff happens. That is why WP:BLP and WP:BLPCRIME exist, so that we don't cause any harm. Even when convicted of one thing, we still must be careful to not assign guilt to anything that hasn't been proven. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Userbox
Hi Christophervincent01. Could you please clarify what you mean when you say in your userbox that "" Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:30, 7 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Well at-the-time, when the now terror organization, IS declared a caliphate, I believed that it was pretty valid, until they started committing quite a few horrendous atrocities, like mass rape and immolation. I believed in their validity at-the-time, since they were then properly implementing the Shari'ah, aligning to my Salafist-Islamist personal beliefs, as well as utilizing more effort to defend the Sunni Muslims against oppressive regimes, such as Bashar al-Assad's and Nouri al-Maliki's. I believe that they were the last valid caliphate, however, with their validity also having ended around 2015-2019, due to some of their un-Islamic behavior (using rape and immolation), as well as their rapid loss of territory. If you ask about their actions when I believe they were a valid caliphate, at-the-time, they were equal to, if not less worse than their adversaries' actions (I'm not condemning or condoning them). Also, if you're asking if this affects my editing, take a look for yourself, I'm not biased when editing and using wikivoice, and I follow WP:NPOV, as well as other rules, to the best of my abilities, without using any of my personal opinions and/or beliefs. This is true when it comes to IS, crime-related topics (my most edited pages), Israel-Palestine, other conflicts, politics-related topics, etc. Finally, if you want to know if this violates WP:UPNOT, I'm in no way supporting IS or their actions, just expressing my opinion on their past validity as a caliphate through this userbox. Please take time to read my response before coming to any conclusions. Christophervincent01 (talk) 05:42, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * This prompted me to check out your userboxes, and the one that says "This user believes torture is a necessary evil in some cases and needs to be practiced more often." is highly inappropriate and a clear violation of WP:UP. Specifically, Statements or pages that seem to advocate, encourage, or condone these behaviors: vandalism, copyright violation, edit warring, harassment, privacy breach, defamation, and acts of violence. Please remove it from your page. The Wordsmith Talk to me 17:42, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom Block
Barkeep49 (talk) 18:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:User Syrn-1


A tag has been placed on Category:User Syrn-1 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

is declined. Please appeal your block to ArbCom. --Yamla (talk) 20:58, 8 June 2024 (UTC)