User talk:Christosprokopiou

Speedy deletion nomination of Valentino liasi


Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:03, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Acroterion   (talk)   19:21, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Valentino liasi


A tag has been placed on Valentino liasi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E Wing (talk) 21:00, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion   (talk)   21:03, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Βαλεντινο Λιαση


A tag has been placed on Βαλεντινο Λιαση requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and give your reasons on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Bhockey10 (talk) 19:52, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Salvio Let's talk about it! 20:42, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Anna Vissi
You have already been blocked twice for disruption on biographical articles, and now I see you appear to making further disruptive edits on the Anna Vissi article. You are repeatedly removing sourced content from this article without giving a reason, despite being repeatedly asked to provide one. This is a collaborative project, and if you are asked to justify you actions you should do so on the talk page, so you can discuss the issue with other users if necessary. Please note that repeatedly removing sourced content without providing a rationale is considered disruptive - so consider this a final warning that any further disruption on this article will result in a block. CT Cooper · &#32;talk 22:08, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for further disruption on WP:BLP articles through removing content repeatedly on Anna Vissi without providing a reason, despite being asked to do so by multiple editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. CT Cooper · &#32;talk 18:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Due to the attempt to evade the block by creating the account, I have re-set the 1 month block on this account. If you wish to appeal your block, you may do so by following the instructions above, but creating new accounts is not going to get you anywhere. Any further attempts at sock puppetry may result in the block on this account being made indefinite. CT Cooper · &#32;talk 17:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Given that the message has not got through, with further socking with, I am switching the block on this account to indefinite. CT Cooper · &#32;talk 13:12, 5 June 2011 (UTC)