User talk:Chriswright68

April 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Pubs Code Regulations 2016 has been accepted
 The Pubs Code Regulations 2016, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Daniel kenneth (talk) 12:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=The_Pubs_Code_Regulations_2016 help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

The Pubs Code Regulations 2016
Before I reinsert what you keep deleting from this article, I thought it worthwhile to explain my rationale for adding what I have.

I think we are agreed that the government envisaged a Pubs Advisory Service provided by the BII.

Whatever the reasons the name "PAS" now belongs to a private company with a sole shareholder,(I assume that's you) and presumably operates for the benefit of that shareholder.

The objects of the BII, by contrast, are, to quote from their memorandum of association, "...for the public benefit...", and their articles of association speak of using all monies in pursuit of their objects.

There is thus a significant difference between how the government expected things to work and how they've actually worked which forms part of the history.

The BII do have a panel of legal, property and financial advisers with multiple choices in each category. http://biibas.bii.org/Panel-Advisors

The facts above are, I believe, indisputable, and I can think of no reason why they should not be included in the section of the article headed "Pubs Advisory Service".

As the philosophy of Wikipedia seems to be, to paraphrase, the more knowledge the merrier; I am interested to hear your rationale for removing my additions relating to the above.

Pedant999 (talk) 16:56, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

You may also wish (if you are indeed the proprietor of the PAS) to consider this extract from Wikipedia's conflict of interest advice: "...If you have a personal connection to a topic or person, you are advised to refrain from editing those articles directly and to provide full disclosure of the connection if you comment about the article on talk pages or in other discussions....)

Pedant999 (talk) 11:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

The Pubs Code Regulations 2016
This adding and deleting could go on forever.

You have my rationale for the additions, and my concerns over possible COI; perhaps you could post your rationale for the deletions.

Pedant999 (talk) 19:42, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

TalkbackThe Pubs Code Regulations 2016
Pedant999 (talk) 13:13, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Talkback The Pubs Code Regulations 2016 (second request)
Pedant999 (talk) 12:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest
There is a discussion at the conflict of interest noticeboard that you may wish to respond to. Meanwhile, here is the relevant information on what constitutes COI here, and the various ways that it can be handled. It is possible to participate in WP if you are in a position of interest, although it is necessary to follow certain guidelines when doing so.

Hello, Chriswright68. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. LaMona (talk) 22:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

The Pubs Code Regulations 2016 - PAS - BII & FLVA
I have amended the Pubs Advisory Service (PAS) section of The Pubs Code Regulations 2016 (diff). The http://www.morningadvertiser.co.uk/Legal/Legislation/Trade-experts-launch-their-own-Pubs-Advisory-Service-in-response-to-Government source makes it very clear that the BII and FLVA are offering (or were as at 2012; or were as at 2012 planning to offer) a PAS service, and that they were somewhat put out by the appearance on the scene of the PAS company. Wikipedia seeks to work from reliable sources (WP:RS), and unless a source refuting the morning advertiser story can be found, I anticipate the BII & FLVA mention will remain in the article. Might I ask that if you have criticism to make of my amendment, you discuss at Talk:The Pubs Code Regulations 2016 so that we can bring the current edit war on that article to an end. thanks --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. The thread is The Pubs Code Regulations 2016. Thank you. --Drm310 (talk) 15:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Commercial Rents (Coronavirus) Bill
Hello, Chriswright68,

Thank you for creating Commercial Rents (Coronavirus) Bill.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"It would be helpful to link to this page from other articles to integrate it into Wikipedia"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lineslarge (talk) 21:48, 13 November 2021 (UTC)