User talk:Chromiumtang

Welcome!
Hello, Chromiumtang, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reliable sources
Thank you for your interest in improving wikipedia. However I had to revert two of your contributions. We have several important rules which ensure the quality of information in our articles. One of them is citing reliable sources, i.e., sources which are guaranteed to provide correct information. Please read our rules about this in WP:RS. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Hello Chromiumtang. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Ethical Culture Fieldston School, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Chromiumtang. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. The fact that you are repeatedly re-adding unencyclopedic marketing material, "mission statements" (which have zero place in an encyclopedia), and minor officials makes it appear strongly that you are affiliated with this institution and you should not be editing the article directly at all.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  20:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)