User talk:Chromonium

The Owl Journal
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Owl Journal, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.theowljournal.com/about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:48, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

The Owl Journal
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Given that you've said that you're "the web editor of The Owl Journal", you should definitely take a few minutes to familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's guidelines for possible conflicts of interest, before making any further edits related to the magazine. Although it can be okay to edit articles about your own work, you should be very careful about doing so. --McGeddon (talk) 17:59, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Brightnetwork
Hi, exceptionally, I'm  going  to  offer you  an informal opportunity to  clean this article up rather than send it  for immediate deletion under articles A7 and G11 at  WP:CSD. Please take note of the various reasons for its tagging and then consider whether it is a) notable within  the meaning  of the Wikipedia definition, b) is proven to  be notable through  unambiguous third party  reports about  it. You will  have some reading  up  to  do, which  everyone should do  before they  attempt a Wikipedia article. The items I recommend are WP:SOCK, WP:COI,  WP:NOTABILITY, WP:RS, and WP:V,  in  that  order. A look at  WP:CITE will  help  you  uderstand how articles' sources should be formatted.--Kudpung (talk) 11:57, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Brightnetworklogo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Brightnetworklogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:22, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of The Owl Journal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Owl Journal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Owl Journal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TSventon (talk) 16:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bright Network


The article Bright Network has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Promotional page, written by SPA and driveby IPs - sufficiently promotional to have been noted in talk. Grandiose claims, but no evidence of notability under WP:ORG, WP:GNG or any other notability guideline. WP:BEFORE shows press releases, churnalism and a few passing mentions - nothing with the WP:CORPDEPTH required to sustain an article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 17:14, 29 August 2021 (UTC)