User talk:Chronicler of the Federal Judiciary

Note to reviewing admin: Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Conflict of laws junkie. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:02, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I am, most certainly, not a sockpuppet of User:Conflict of laws junkie, or anyone else. I think you should assume good faith. The account I created was legitimate, and I created it for the legitimate purpose of editing articles about the federal judiciary.


 * When I logged in on this username to edit, I discovered a message that this IP had been used by someone to vandalize Wikipedia. Because I have logged into WP on an IP that had been used by someone to disrupt Wikipedia, that's probably why your investigation thought, erroneously, that I am a sockpuppet.


 * The "someone" who disruptively used this IP, was not me! Please unblock this user account. Because I am a trained lawyer, I can use my knowledge of the court system to make a positive contribution to Wikipedia.


 * Can someone give me guidance: What's the best way to prove I'm not a sock, to be unblocked? Chronicler of the Federal Judiciary (talk) 17:16, 12 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I have no checkuser authority. But be aware that a checkuser block is not placed only on the basis of co-incidence of IP. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)