User talk:Chronophryne

Welcome!
Hello, Chronophryne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 07:05, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Chronophryne
Great to see a new person with interest on amphibians here, warm welcome!

Regarding your remark "Not actually a stub in that there is so little known about this species that nothing else can really be added". Well, I have assessed these now as stubs, but I largely agree with the point you are making - the bar for assessing an article as "Start Class" cannot be very high for animals whose biology is basically unknown. I would say that when the basic information on its biological characteristics (e.g., size, rough habitus), habitat and distribution are in place, and there are good sources, it should be OK for Start Class. Here, what is missing is a secondary source. Fortunately, for amphibians, the Amphibian Species of the World is a reliable and up-to-date source.

I'm not sure how familiar you are with procedures in Wikipedia, but if you want the Albericus species to appear under Chronophryne, the "correct" procedure is to move then (tab in the top right of the page, next to the search), not copy and paste.

— Cheers, Micromesistius (talk) 09:43, 8 January 2017 (UTC)