User talk:Chrumps

Random Smiley Award
 For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Awardoriginated by Pedia-I  (Explanation and Disclaimer)

--TomasBat (Talk) 13:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Giraffe
Thank you for your photo of the rothschildi giraffe. It's nice to have more photos which aren't reticulated. :-) Mehmet Karatay 20:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Rose Chafer
Hi Chrumps,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Cetonia-aurata.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 25, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-10-25.  howcheng  {chat} 20:57, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Hallo
Ik ben Henk.

77.171.78.130 (talk) 08:48, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chrumps/sandbox/test


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  01:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages
When you create a talk page for a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 20:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Faculty of Chemistry of Lodz University of Technology for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faculty of Chemistry of Lodz University of Technology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Faculty of Chemistry of Lodz University of Technology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jbh (talk) 11:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Faculty of Chemistry of Lodz University of Technology. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ''Recreating a page redirected by AfD and modifying the header to falsely reflect a KEEP decision as you did here [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Faculty_of_Chemistry_of_Lodz_University_of_Technology&diff=661334617&oldid=661334472] is disruptive. Do not do it again. Thank you for your understanding.'' J bh  Talk  03:15, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Nomination of Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering of Lodz University of Technology for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering of Lodz University of Technology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering of Lodz University of Technology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. J bh Talk  14:57, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Politechnika Łódzka, budownictwo
Sprawdź proszę ostatnie zdanie, a właściwie ostatnie dwa wyrazy, które dodałeś w Lodz University of Technology w tej edycji. (Studies studies wydaje mi się podejrzane, ale mój angielski nie jest tak dobry, jak bym chciał, i liczę się z tym, że tak właśnie miało być, więc nie będę tego sam zmieniać.) --CiaPan (talk) 09:25, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Open access journal
Hi, Would you be interested in being an editor for the WikiJournal of Science? It's a journal modelled on the successful Wikipedia-integrated academic journal: WikiJournal of Medicine. Currently several physicists have joined the editorial board, but it is hoped that the journal will be open to all STEM topics. It'd mostly involve inviting articles and organising peer review. Anyway, let me know if it's the sort of thing that might interest you (Relevant short letter in Science). T.Shafee(Evo &#38; Evo)talk 00:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages
You're probably not aware but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. The article about the person you added to February 17 ‎ did not have any source that I could add to this page to back up your addition so this change has been reverted. Please do not restore it without providing a direct reliable source. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 03:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Really can not find any sources??? Look at 3rd sentence of Friedrich_Konrad_Beilstein ending [ 1 ] - it's a reference! Eh, easier to revert? Chrumps (talk) 15:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * As I don't have access to that source, I can't verify it. That info may be in there - it may not. Beyond that, it's not my job. The WP:BURDEN is on you.  Toddst1 (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * So you should also delete that source in the article Friedrich Konrad Beilstein and relevant parts of the article, because you don't have access to it... and maybe all other sources in wikipedia with limited access? Chrumps (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs
Thank you for your recent articles, including Polish Radiation Research Society, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:36, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages
Thank you for your recent articles, including Polish Radiation Research Society, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:36, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)